Animal Rights Terrorists are GOING TO JAIL!
Animal Rights Terrorists are GOING TO JAIL!
Author
Discussion

Don

Original Poster:

28,378 posts

313 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politic...

Telegraph said:
Animal rights activists guilty of Huntingdon Life Sciences blackmail campaign

Four animals rights activists have been found guilty of blackmailing companies who supplied Huntingdon Life Sciences.

All five denied conspiracy to blackmail but Selby, Wadham, Medd-Hall and Nicholson were found guilty. Holmes was cleared of the charge.

One of the jurors refused to be seen in court while the verdict was announced after 33 hours and 48 minutes of deliberation.

Sentencing will take place on January 19 at Winchester Crown Court.

Selby, Wadham and Medd-Hall were released on conditional bail, while Nicholson was remanded in custody.

Three other people - Gregg Avery, Natasha Avery and Daniel Amos - have pleaded guilty to conspiracy to blackmail.

The hierarchy of the group called Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (Shac) used threats such as claiming that managers of the companies were paedophiles, hoax bombs parcels, criminal damage and threatening telephone calls to force them to cut links with the animal testing company.

The aim was to target suppliers or any company with a secondary link with Huntingdon Life Sciences (HLS), based in Cambridge.

One of the features of intimidation included sending used sanitary towels in the post, saying they were contaminated with the Aids virus, and personal campaigns against the management of companies including daubing roads outside their homes with words like "Puppy Killer".

Nicholson, from Eversley in Hampshire, was a founder member of Shac, who managed the "menacing" campaigns against the firms who were named on the group's website.

The blackmail would only stop when they put out a "capitulation statement" to Shac saying they would not supply HLS, which conducts animal testing for the pharmaceutical industry, the court was told.

Medd-Hall, from Croydon in south London, was a computer and research expert high up in Shac who uncovered company links with HLS.

Wadham, from Bromley, south east London, joined Shac in 2005 and was in regular attendance at demonstrations against the firms and HLS.

Selby, from Chiswick in west London, was also a regular activist at demonstrations in the UK and Europe, including a violent demo in Paris.

Holmes, from Newcastle upon Tyne, was alleged to be a senior member of Shac who took part in criminal damage in the UK, the court heard.
Frankly we should let the Met at them. But there you go...good to know they won't just escape punishment..

XitUp

7,690 posts

233 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
I agree with them, but not really with thier methods.

Don

Original Poster:

28,378 posts

313 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
XitUp said:
I agree with them, but not really with thier methods.
I defend their right to speak out against what they believe to be wrong.

Their actions, however, were indefensible, pure evil. May they rot in hell.

XitUp

7,690 posts

233 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
Don said:
XitUp said:
I agree with them, but not really with thier methods.
I defend their right to speak out against what they believe to be wrong.

Their actions, however, were indefensible, pure evil. May they rot in hell.
Meh, they could have done a lot worse.

Yugguy

10,728 posts

264 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
Superb.

Cowardly, unwashed, workshy S.

Stop trying to scare children and old women, take off your fking masks you soft sacks of ste.

cocopop

1,300 posts

234 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
Utter utter scum.

They deserve everything they get.

bkay88

727 posts

216 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
XitUp said:
Don said:
XitUp said:
I agree with them, but not really with thier methods.
I defend their right to speak out against what they believe to be wrong.

Their actions, however, were indefensible, pure evil. May they rot in hell.
Meh, they could have done a lot worse.
True, but if they were tormenting me or any member of my family...

It's inexcusable, they can rot in jail for all I care.


randomman

2,215 posts

218 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
The thing that puts me off hippy women is all the hair 'downstairs' some of them (not seen this bunch so no comment) can be quite fit and lets face it - free love - wink wink, know what I mean

XitUp

7,690 posts

233 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
bkay88 said:
True, but if they were tormenting me or any member of my family...

It's inexcusable, they can rot in jail for all I care.
Personally, I think it's not as bad as what the people they were targeting were doing.
But I still don't think two wrongs make a right.

Edited by XitUp on Tuesday 23 December 14:59

FourWheelDrift

92,239 posts

313 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
XitUp said:
Meh, they could have done a lot worse.
They have done, well others in the group have.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article39...

XitUp

7,690 posts

233 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
XitUp said:
Meh, they could have done a lot worse.
They have done, well others in the group have.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article39...
Yeah, I remember that. It was a bit much.

captainzep

13,306 posts

221 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
XitUp said:
Personally, I think it's not as bad as what the people they were targeting where doing.
What were they doing?

I'm vaguely aware this is to with animal experimentation but don't know much more than that.

Edited by captainzep on Tuesday 23 December 14:55

Yugguy

10,728 posts

264 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
I hate every single one of them.

Silverbullet767

11,241 posts

235 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
Yugguy said:
I hate every single one of them.
DIE

Mekon

2,493 posts

245 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
XitUp said:
Personally, I think it's not as bad as what the people they were targeting where doing.
But I still don't think two wrongs make a right.
Serving the life sciences sector compares unfavourably with terrorism?

Yugguy

10,728 posts

264 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
Silverbullet767 said:
Yugguy said:
I hate every single one of them.
DIE
I'd be happy if they did.

XitUp

7,690 posts

233 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
Mekon said:
XitUp said:
Personally, I think it's not as bad as what the people they were targeting where doing.
But I still don't think two wrongs make a right.
Serving the life sciences sector compares unfavourably with terrorism?
Sometimes.

p.s. sorry for the bad spelling.

bkay88

727 posts

216 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
XitUp said:
FourWheelDrift said:
XitUp said:
Meh, they could have done a lot worse.
They have done, well others in the group have.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article39...
Yeah, I remember that. It was a bit much.
That makes me fking sick. How deluded does someone have to be to do that?

okgo

42,078 posts

227 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
Yugguy said:
I hate every single one of them.
+1.

There are more pressing issue's out there than Animal testing.

Apache

39,731 posts

313 months

Tuesday 23rd December 2008
quotequote all
XitUp said:
FourWheelDrift said:
XitUp said:
Meh, they could have done a lot worse.
They have done, well others in the group have.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article39...
Yeah, I remember that. It was a bit much.
A bit much?!! as in Hitler was a bit aggressive? jesus, these people terrorise women and children, destroy property and vandalise cars, they deserve everything they get.