Why was Germany succesful after the war?
Why was Germany succesful after the war?
Author
Discussion

raf_gti

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

235 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
Forgive my ignorance on the matter but as I'm sat here bored the thought crossed my mind for some strange reason.

Britain was the world leader but was bankrupt after two wars, surely ze Germans should have been in a similar boat? Or was it simply because the Allies helped them re-structure and in our case had to pay back the Americans?


Alfa_75_Steve

7,489 posts

229 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
raf_gti said:
Forgive my ignorance on the matter but as I'm sat here bored the thought crossed my mind for some strange reason.

Britain was the world leader but was bankrupt after two wars, surely ze Germans should have been in a similar boat? Or was it simply because the Allies helped them re-structure and in our case had to pay back the Americans?
Erm, yes. Got it in one.

BigLepton

5,042 posts

230 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
Before the war Britain had a huge empire that was integral to her finances. After the war most of it was gone. Germany never had such an empire which it relied on so restarting after the war was easier in many ways.

BigLepton

5,042 posts

230 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
Alfa_75_Steve said:
raf_gti said:
Forgive my ignorance on the matter but as I'm sat here bored the thought crossed my mind for some strange reason.

Britain was the world leader but was bankrupt after two wars, surely ze Germans should have been in a similar boat? Or was it simply because the Allies helped them re-structure and in our case had to pay back the Americans?
Erm, yes. Got it in one.
Not really - Britain benefited from the Marshall plan at the same rates Germany did. We did have to pay back lend-lease loans but the reason we did so and strung them out for 50 years was because they were loaned at very low interest rates to it made no sense to pay them off quickly when we could earn more from the money than it cost to repay.

FourWheelDrift

92,258 posts

313 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
Also as an example British Army officer Major Ivan Hurst took over the running of VW after the war to get it back on it's feet, by 1946 it was making 1000 cars a month. Inlcuding a British Army order for 20,000 vehicles.

cloggy

4,959 posts

238 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
Alfa_75_Steve said:
raf_gti said:
Forgive my ignorance on the matter but as I'm sat here bored the thought crossed my mind for some strange reason.

Britain was the world leader but was bankrupt after two wars, surely ze Germans should have been in a similar boat? Or was it simply because the Allies helped them re-structure and in our case had to pay back the Americans?
Erm, yes. Got it in one.
Bingo, not only that but Germany was bombed flat so they build state of the art (at that time) new factory's whilst Britain kept production in Victorian outdated facilities.

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

227 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
Also the scale of devastation allowed for redevelopment of its infrastructure on a massive scale, without the need for military spending. A modern infrastructure makes a more efficient county.

raf_gti

Original Poster:

4,253 posts

235 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
rhinochopig said:
Also the scale of devastation allowed for redevelopment of its infrastructure on a massive scale, without the need for military spending. A modern infrastructure makes a more efficient county.
Fantastic.

So now we have just the excuse that we need to flatten this country and start all over? biggrin

I wonder where the world would be right now if it wasn't for the two wars. Technologically we would be very far behind I should imagine.

Gold

1,998 posts

234 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
rhinochopig said:
Also the scale of devastation allowed for redevelopment of its infrastructure on a massive scale, without the need for military spending. A modern infrastructure makes a more efficient county.
Something our government should bear in mind.

grumbledoak

32,571 posts

262 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
As 'rhinochopig' has intimated, "No military spending" was a huge factor. It had the same effect on Japan- without expansionist motives and the ensuing huge costs, both countries prospered massively. Britain, in contrast, tried to continue the pretense that we had an empire. We might have made a go with the Commonwealth, but joining the EC left us with all the associated costs and none of the benefits...

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

254 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
Also, depending on how "postwar" you're thinking, France and Germany formed a partnership in the 50s to revitalise European industrialisation - the European Coal & Steel Community. Which would later become the EEC and now EU.

Ironically, it was Churchill that scuppered us on that one as it was actually his suggestion for Europe to unite to try and recover from the mess of the war, but that Britain wouldn't actually be a part of it, preferring to maintain close ties with America rather than the continent. The French (well, de Gaulle specifically really) blocked our entrance into the community twice in the 60s citing exactly the same justification.

eta - fk me, I remembered something from my A-levels...

Edited by Famous Graham on Sunday 28th December 15:57

cloggy

4,959 posts

238 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
Famous Graham said:
Also, depending on how "postwar" you're thinking, France and Germany formed a partnership in the 50s to revitalise European industrialisation - the European Coal & Steel Community. Which would later become the EEC and now EU.

Ironically, it was Churchill that scuppered us on that one as it was actually his suggestion for Europe to unite to try and recover from the mess of the war, but that Britain wouldn't actually be a part of it, preferring to maintain close ties with America rather than the continent. The French (well, de Gaulle specifically really) blocked our entrance into the community twice in the 60s citing exactly the same justification.

eta - fk me, I remembered something from my A-levels...

Edited by Famous Graham on Sunday 28th December 15:57
So not a completely wasted education then as I feared. biggrin

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

254 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
cloggy said:
Famous Graham said:
Also, depending on how "postwar" you're thinking, France and Germany formed a partnership in the 50s to revitalise European industrialisation - the European Coal & Steel Community. Which would later become the EEC and now EU.

Ironically, it was Churchill that scuppered us on that one as it was actually his suggestion for Europe to unite to try and recover from the mess of the war, but that Britain wouldn't actually be a part of it, preferring to maintain close ties with America rather than the continent. The French (well, de Gaulle specifically really) blocked our entrance into the community twice in the 60s citing exactly the same justification.

eta - fk me, I remembered something from my A-levels...

Edited by Famous Graham on Sunday 28th December 15:57
So not a completely wasted education then as I feared. biggrin
Just don't ask me to recall anything about the other period I covered - the Renaissance :shudder: biggrin

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

254 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
Oh, by the way, the rapid global rise of Communism and the "protection" that a solid West German economy could provide to the citizens of the Federal Republic (in terms of making Europe less likely to bargain it away to the Eastern Bloc), shouldn't be underestimated either, as far as galvanising Germany's politicians and populous is concerned.

Adenaur's the chap generally credited with getting things back on track.

Edited by Famous Graham on Sunday 28th December 16:14

cloggy

4,959 posts

238 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
Nobody mentioned 'the Marshall Plan', huge financial investments by the US in Germany to protect against the commies as Graham mentioned.

horton

804 posts

281 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
As 'rhinochopig' has intimated, "No military spending" was a huge factor. It had the same effect on Japan- without expansionist motives and the ensuing huge costs, both countries prospered massively. Britain, in contrast, tried to continue the pretense that we had an empire. We might have made a go with the Commonwealth, but joining the EC left us with all the associated costs and none of the benefits...
But Japan has one of the highest military budgets in the world.
They might not have an offensive force, but their military is damn well funded.

Fort Jefferson

8,237 posts

251 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
raf_gti said:
Forgive my ignorance on the matter but as I'm sat here bored the thought crossed my mind for some strange reason.

Britain was the world leader but was bankrupt after two wars, surely ze Germans should have been in a similar boat? Or was it simply because the Allies helped them re-structure and in our case had to pay back the Americans?
We only finished paying them back in 2006.

BigLepton

5,042 posts

230 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
cloggy said:
Nobody mentioned 'the Marshall Plan', huge financial investments by the US in Germany to protect against the commies as Graham mentioned.
I did. Fourth post on the thread. . . . . . . .

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

254 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
cloggy said:
Nobody mentioned 'the Marshall Plan', huge financial investments by the US in Germany to protect against the commies as Graham mentioned.
yes The French tried to knacker that one, getting a bit wary of a rising Germany again, but the US persevered. It was massive pressure from the US that actually got France to acknowledge the West German state in the late 40s in the first place, too.

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

227 months

Sunday 28th December 2008
quotequote all
cloggy said:
Famous Graham said:
Also, depending on how "postwar" you're thinking, France and Germany formed a partnership in the 50s to revitalise European industrialisation - the European Coal & Steel Community. Which would later become the EEC and now EU.

Ironically, it was Churchill that scuppered us on that one as it was actually his suggestion for Europe to unite to try and recover from the mess of the war, but that Britain wouldn't actually be a part of it, preferring to maintain close ties with America rather than the continent. The French (well, de Gaulle specifically really) blocked our entrance into the community twice in the 60s citing exactly the same justification.

eta - fk me, I remembered something from my A-levels...

Edited by Famous Graham on Sunday 28th December 15:57
So not a completely wasted education then as I feared. biggrin
Actually there was an approach from France to the UK, for France to become part of the UK.

Imagine THAT!!!!

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6261885.stm