The deluded Obama supporters...
Discussion
http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/12/31/obama.l...
Apparently, a poll done a few days ago suggests that Obama:
a) inspires confidence
b) can get things done
c) tough enough to be president
He hasn't actually done anything yet, let alone hold an office, and some how people feel "can get things done" and has displayed enough talent to be "tough enough to be president".
Apparently, a poll done a few days ago suggests that Obama:
a) inspires confidence
b) can get things done
c) tough enough to be president
He hasn't actually done anything yet, let alone hold an office, and some how people feel "can get things done" and has displayed enough talent to be "tough enough to be president".
ref said:
Seventy-six percent of Americans questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey released Wednesday said Obama is a strong and decisive leader.
I know he's meant to be some sort of Messiah, but how can you rate someone as being a strong and decisive leader when they aren't the leader yet???? There are some feckwits out there. And worryingly, they have a vote.Los Angeles said:
By his election he has altered almost overnight the world's perception of America as a sick, divided, venal, and aggressive country. By the success of his campaign he has shown himelf a masterful organiser and orator, keeping staff from breaking ranks or faltering, never getting deflected off message by slur or slime. And by his choice of cabinet he shows himself well able to delegate tasks to experienced hands. So much for his detractors claim he is inexperienced.
I'm sure you could do that, LA...Running the USA is a different matter...
Olf said:
tinman0 said:
He hasn't actually done anything yet, let alone hold an office, and some how people feel "can get things done" and has displayed enough talent to be "tough enough to be president".
Governor of anywhere? Mayor of anywhere? Ah yes, he was a senator. Senators don't run anything. Senators are part of the electoral process but don't have any responsibility in a public office.
tinman0 said:
Olf said:
tinman0 said:
He hasn't actually done anything yet, let alone hold an office, and some how people feel "can get things done" and has displayed enough talent to be "tough enough to be president".
Governor of anywhere? Mayor of anywhere? Ah yes, he was a senator. Senators don't run anything. Senators are part of the electoral process but don't have any responsibility in a public office.
Los Angeles said:
Captain Cadillac said:
I didn't vote for him and I freely admit it. I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt until he put Hillary Clinton (That f
king demonic b
h) in as secretary of state.
In doing so he has kept his promise to unite and heal. But he has also been smart - he has isolated and almost certainly emasculated a one-time critic. Let her dare to say anything negative about him now - betrayal? That's putting it mildly.
king demonic b
h) in as secretary of state.Half of his cabinet consists of former Clinton employees.
We're f
ked, as usual.Captain Cadillac said:
I didn't vote for him and I freely admit it. I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt until he put Hillary Clinton (That f
king demonic b
h) in as secretary of state.
Hillary Clinton as Secretary Of State or Sarah Palin as Vice President - which would you prefer?
king demonic b
h) in as secretary of state.Obama didn't win because he was the best choice for the job, he won because he wasn't the worst.
Olf said:
tinman0 said:
Olf said:
tinman0 said:
He hasn't actually done anything yet, let alone hold an office, and some how people feel "can get things done" and has displayed enough talent to be "tough enough to be president".
Governor of anywhere? Mayor of anywhere? Ah yes, he was a senator. Senators don't run anything. Senators are part of the electoral process but don't have any responsibility in a public office.
Getting elected is the easy bit. Being a good leader to a country is a different ball park.
Los Angeles said:
Simpo Two said:
Tony Blair 1997 I believe.
Wrong. Blair ditched Clause 4 - better known as socialism UK Labour style, and did so against fierce opposition from unions. Obama did not get elected on the basis of alienating any section of American society.
(you have to say that with a hill billy twang and a straw in your mouth).
tinman0 said:
Olf said:
tinman0 said:
He hasn't actually done anything yet, let alone hold an office, and some how people feel "can get things done" and has displayed enough talent to be "tough enough to be president".
Governor of anywhere? Mayor of anywhere? Ah yes, he was a senator. Senators don't run anything. Senators are part of the electoral process but don't have any responsibility in a public office.
Geedub was governor of Texas for long enough; fat lot of good THAT executive experience did the USA.
Los Angeles said:
Simpo Two said:
Tony Blair 1997 I believe.
Wrong. Blair ditched Clause 4 - better known as socialism UK Labour style, and did so against fierce opposition from unions. Obama did not get elected on the basis of alienating any section of American society.I suggest that Obama was elected because Bush was unpopular and not as good at public speaking as his silver-tongued rival. I also have no doubt that many blacks and coloureds also voted for him on racial grounds.
Well, he seems nice enough, and now he's in. Time will tell if he can cut the mustard. I hope he can.
Edited by Simpo Two on Thursday 1st January 00:53
branflakes said:
Captain Cadillac said:
I didn't vote for him and I freely admit it. I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt until he put Hillary Clinton (That f
king demonic b
h) in as secretary of state.
Hillary Clinton as Secretary Of State or Sarah Palin as Vice President - which would you prefer?
king demonic b
h) in as secretary of state.Obama didn't win because he was the best choice for the job, he won because he wasn't the worst.
Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



