Question about the rail network?
Question about the rail network?
Author
Discussion

andrew_huxtable

Original Poster:

936 posts

217 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
Private companies are responsible for the running of the trains. But i read that the government gives them money. Do these private companies be it scotrail or who ever make profits? If so why the fk is the government giving them cash. I`m confused by the situation. Please someone explain.

Edited by andrew_huxtable on Friday 2nd January 18:01

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

284 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
You're not half as confused as me...

HTH...

grumbledoak

32,571 posts

262 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
All our public transport is run by private for-profit companies. And, with guaranteed public money, they don't even need to provide a good service to turn a profit. The tax-payer is, yet again, tucked up like a kipper.

matchmaker

9,036 posts

229 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
All our public transport is run by private for-profit companies. And, with guaranteed public money, they don't even need to provide a good service to turn a profit. The tax-payer is, yet again, tucked up like a kipper.
Which political party had this idea?

andrew_huxtable

Original Poster:

936 posts

217 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
Is it possible to find out how much Scotrail made last year and how much they received from the Government.

Yertis

19,710 posts

295 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
matchmaker said:
grumbledoak said:
All our public transport is run by private for-profit companies. And, with guaranteed public money, they don't even need to provide a good service to turn a profit. The tax-payer is, yet again, tucked up like a kipper.
Which political party had this idea?
This was carried out under Major's Conservative Govt IIRC. Privatisation of BR (or rather the way it was carried out) was one of the daftest things they did, IMO.

The rail network is one national asset that I believe is genuinely deserving of Government subsidy. It is, potentially, a vital strategic and economic asset. Asking the railways to pay their own way is, at the moment, a bit like asking the Navy to pay their way. In fifty years I suggest we'll be wondering why such as asset was allowed to be so nearly destroyed.

Orb the Impaler

1,881 posts

219 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
grumbledoak said:
All our public transport is run by private for-profit companies. And, with guaranteed public money, they don't even need to provide a good service to turn a profit. The tax-payer is, yet again, tucked up like a kipper.
Well imagine how you'd feel if you were living in Manchester up until ~20 days ago and you were under the threat of getting buttfked with a congestion charge in order to give these private companies yet more money!

ewenm

28,506 posts

274 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
Privatising public transport and still trying to call it "public transport" seems ridiculous to me. Providing a good level of service (even if it ends up being for just one passenger) and earning a profit appear to be contrary aims.

Simpo Two

92,708 posts

294 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
Surely it's a 'subsidy'? Many industries receive these - ask the French!

grumbledoak

32,571 posts

262 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
Yertis said:
The rail network is one national asset that I believe is genuinely deserving of Government subsidy. It is, potentially, a vital strategic and economic asset. Asking the railways to pay their own way is, at the moment, a bit like asking the Navy to pay their way. In fifty years I suggest we'll be wondering why such as asset was allowed to be so nearly destroyed.
I was under the impression that most of our railways were built privately, then Nationalised under Labour, then privatised once more. But, the government cannot regulate itself in the way it regulates private business (no self control), so Nationalised industries are normally st. Yet trains don't do competition very well, you don't normally get a choice of competing trains on one line, so it is all a big cartel. The current war on private transport doesn't help, as the government forcing up the cost of motoring just allows the train and bus companies to raise their fares (they are aware that their real competition is the car).

Apache

39,731 posts

313 months

Friday 2nd January 2009
quotequote all
The network is run by Network Rail, the service is operated by TOCs like Virgin who lease the rolling stock from ROSCOs like Porterbrook, HSBC and Angel Trains, some farm out maintenance to companies like Bombardier, others like Alstom do it in house.
NR absorbs loads of money for route upgrades and money has to be found for rolling stock mods for things like extended platform operations which the TOC has to pay for. All this has to be considered against length of contract etc.