More unbelievable Government farce.
More unbelievable Government farce.
Author
Discussion

wadgebeast

Original Poster:

3,856 posts

240 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/art...

Even Yes Minister wouldn't stoop as far as this.....

grumbledoak

32,566 posts

262 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
rofl

Though, sadly, I'm not surprised; DfT has long been a joke at our expense.

Edit- Sorry, it's DfT today, though 'against' would be more appropriate than 'for'.

Edited by grumbledoak on Wednesday 7th January 09:53

motco

17,605 posts

275 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
nuts

Hedders

24,460 posts

276 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
"Yesterday The Times decided to try to catch the ghost bus. At Ealing Broadway station, a ticket inspector denied that any such bus existed. When asked to check, he went into his office and returned three minutes later with a piece of paper headed: “Rail replacement bus. Internal document not for display or distribution.”

It stated that the bus would depart from stop “F”. At exactly 9.45am it duly arrived there. The driver regarded us suspiciously as we flagged him down. Once aboard Simon Houlton explained to us that he had been told not to expect any passengers. "

You really could not make it up...well you could but now you don't need to!


motco

17,605 posts

275 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Hedders said:
“Rail replacement bus. Internal document not for display or distribution.”
Hitch-Hikers' Guide to the Galaxy said:
"But the plans were on display ..."

"On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them."

"That's the display department."

"With a torch."

"Ah, well the lights had probably gone."

"So had the stairs."

"But look, you found the notice didn't you?"

"Yes," said Arthur, "yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying Beware of the Leopard."

s3fella

10,524 posts

216 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
I'd love to get this each Tuesday, sit their without saying a word, then as I got off, ust give a polite "See You Next Tuesday" to the driver and ask him to pass that on to all his managment team etc too...

Incredible.

I was awoken by my "driveway alarm" going off at 4am Tuesday am, and looked out the window to see an ambulance creeping round the cul de sac, and a paramedic running up and down driveways with a torch. Worried about them struggling to find an ill neighbour, I got dressed and went outside to speak with them as I know mosy people in the village.
Imagine my surprise when the driver just said the name of a different street than he was in, but one that was in the village. When he said he was looking for #32 on this particlar street, I suggested he may have a problem as there are only three houses on it, so I asked him for the fmaily name they were looking for, (again as I know most people).....er, I dont know......he replied.

Oh well never mind, we'll head back to base, if it is important they will call again, we cannot waste all night here, we've been here 30 minutes already.....!
Next moring I contacted the Ambulance Service to ask about this somewhat strange incident. They did get back to me to explain it was not an emrgency, but a medical transfer, (WTF at 4am!) the adresss HAD been correct, but the village was not........When I asked how much this incident had cost the taxpayer, they told me it was not the issue....

Public Sector feckelss wonders!

Carpie

1,119 posts

224 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Not sure what the issue is here.

Train service is unavailable so a bus service is provided instead, this frequently happens.

Don't know why no one is using it, unless the people that used the train service have not been informed of it.

Captain Volvo

204 posts

228 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Carpie said:
Not sure what the issue is here.

Train service is unavailable so a bus service is provided instead, this frequently happens.

Don't know why no one is using it, unless the people that used the train service have not been informed of it.
"This service, funded by the Department for Transport, is not advertised on any timetables or departures screens, and staff at the stations it serves are not even aware it exists."

Seems noone knows about it

Puggit

49,790 posts

277 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Carpie said:
Not sure what the issue is here.

Train service is unavailable so a bus service is provided instead, this frequently happens.

Don't know why no one is using it, unless the people that used the train service have not been informed of it.
Have you read the article?

W333

417 posts

252 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
That does raise a smile

Pupp

12,947 posts

301 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Carpie said:
Not sure what the issue is here.

Train service is unavailable so a bus service is provided instead, this frequently happens.

Don't know why no one is using it, unless the people that used the train service have not been informed of it.
The issue is it is a sham to cirumvent proper consultation on permanent withdrawal of the rail service it 'replaces'. Lip service to stop the operator acting unlawfully.

Dimski

2,100 posts

228 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Pupp said:
Carpie said:
Not sure what the issue is here.

Train service is unavailable so a bus service is provided instead, this frequently happens.

Don't know why no one is using it, unless the people that used the train service have not been informed of it.
The issue is it is a sham to cirumvent proper consultation on permanent withdrawal of the rail service it 'replaces'. Lip service to stop the operator acting unlawfully.
How many people have complained about the loss of this train service?

Regardless of the cheating, if the service is nothing but a money drain, I am not complaining if they axe it. Just a shame they are now wasting money on the bus.

But of course, if they axed the service properly, with consultation etc, it would have brought them all out the woodwork, complaining about the tragic loss of service....

They were screwed either way.

Carpie

1,119 posts

224 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Yes I have read the article and it is quite sketchy with the details.

It's only a problem if the original users of the train service are not informed of its existence. When they say it is not timetabled at the stations, they probably (but haven't specified) mean the bus stations it stops at, that's not a problem as the coach's purpose is to provide an alternative means for those that wanted to use the train service, it is not a normal bus service.

Yes it would be useful for other bus users to be informed about it in case it's useful for them, but so long as the users of the train know about it, it's fine.

I took a coach from Swansea to London once and it was empty all the way except for myself, and that was mid-day, the same service also runs at 4AM, I imagine that runs empty sometimes, but it still has to run.

sniff diesel

13,125 posts

241 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Well done to the Times for bringing this to the public's attention.

voyds9

8,490 posts

312 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Could have saved a couple of hundred pounds by running a minibus instead.

TehMonkey

387 posts

216 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
More reason to use a car.