Ginge R - Is this your Rover 216 SLi? (Vol 1)
Ginge R - Is this your Rover 216 SLi? (Vol 1)
Author
Discussion

Ginge R

Original Poster:

4,761 posts

241 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Sick and tired of depreciation, roadsalt and modern tat? Me too.

So I bought me a winter warmer.

10 months tax and MoT, fuel, delivery, 2 owners, 83,000 miles and history that would make the Rome blush (the first owner even bought s second servicing logbook and kept the invoice). So by all means smile as you scoot past in your (- insert here) if I don't part-ex this for lots more than I paid for it (assuming the head doesn't warp), I'll eat my hat. I'll be sure not to sell it to James May mind. Clearly, he doesn't appreciate quality.



Clever use of aerodynamics help keep the car stable at speeds of 45 mph;



Chrome and burr walnut evoke feelings of quality;



Not so much a gentleman's club, more.. a rest room.



Little bit of rot and scuffing. Oh well. weeping



Good off road too;


And don't think this has stunted my motoring ambition! I've seen this little honey and my juices are flowing at upgrading sooner rather than later.cool


Sorry, almost forgot - £270. Mock.. here \/

fido

18,327 posts

277 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
scary, that looks like the one my mate had at uni .. L-reg in the same colour (brand new) .. 111bhp and it was quite pokey, 0-60 a tad less than the GTi. amazing to think of it now, but we were all quite envious of it at the time - besides 12k(?) was a lotta car in those days (and i had a crappy old Nissan which my mum kindly donated to me).

andyps

7,819 posts

304 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
I'm not going to knock it - they are good cars. I had a 216GSi as a company car, took it over from someone else at about 1 year old with 11k miles on the clock, had it for three years and it had covered 116k when it went back. I only ever got one tankful less than 30mpg (and that was on a trip when I did 175 miles in 2 hours 1 minute), it never used a drop of oil - the level didn't move between services. It only let me down once and that was when the cambelt snapped, but 2 hours later I was back on the road as it did no internal damage.

Was a good car in its day, and with basically Honda mechanics no reason they should give a problem later. Was way better than the 218SLD which replaced it, but the D was not my choice!

BlueCello

6,225 posts

229 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
My dad had a white one, he absolutely loved it. Can anybody explain why these things- seemingly regardless of engine size- go like stink?? smile

sniff diesel

13,124 posts

234 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
My neighbour's daughter has one of these shape Rovers, a 220 GSi. Overheard her saying "it's not very good on fuel because it's a sports car you see" Yeah right love, course it is rolleyes

BlueCello

6,225 posts

229 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
sniff diesel said:
My neighbour's daughter has one of these shape Rovers, a 220 GSi. Overheard her saying "it's not very good on fuel because it's a sports car you see" Yeah right love, course it is rolleyes
Well, 0-60 in under 7 seconds on that model. Not exactly slow! smile

Kurtblythman

2,856 posts

216 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
rofl

Hero!

bow

PurelyRetro

7,211 posts

226 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
My brother had one of these and converted it into a fast-hatch-back version of the all great and mighty Pontiac Transam from Smokey and the Bandit. He resprayed it black, and did all the work himself including the Firebird on the bonnet, unfortunately it had a short life.

Edited by PurelyRetro on Wednesday 7th January 22:08

sniff diesel

13,124 posts

234 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
BlueCello said:
sniff diesel said:
My neighbour's daughter has one of these shape Rovers, a 220 GSi. Overheard her saying "it's not very good on fuel because it's a sports car you see" Yeah right love, course it is rolleyes
Well, 0-60 in under 7 seconds on that model. Not exactly slow! smile
I don't think it's a turbo, might be the 220 GTi rather than GSi then.

Edited by sniff diesel on Wednesday 7th January 22:13

deviant

4,316 posts

232 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
BlueCello said:
My dad had a white one, he absolutely loved it. Can anybody explain why these things- seemingly regardless of engine size- go like stink?? smile
Because they are probably about as crash worthy as a watermelon so dont weigh as much as modern cars with a similar power output.

Ginge R

Original Poster:

4,761 posts

241 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
If you really stomp that kickdown, then it shifts. I'm going to sound scary now but, er.. it fairly whizzes along. boxedin

I like it. It makes me smile, its honest and although the jury is still out, I'm sure I can find room for it if I decide to keep it. Bilt Hamber will cure that rust without blinking. In fact, Bilt Hamber clay and balm etc will make it look good again ('good' as in 'detailed good'), I'm sure of that.

You just don't see any anymore (yeah yeah - there's a reason for that, I know hehe).

Darkslider

3,084 posts

211 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Only criticism is you maybe paid a little too much for it, but I guess the minimum price for any car with decent length tax and test is £300ish so maybe not.

If I were you and was looking for a super cheap Rover I'd have got a bubble shape 200 VI personally. Borrowed one for a few weeks and with a 1.8 Vtec K series engine making 145 odd bhp it was pretty nippy for it's size! If I ever have to go that cheap for bangernomics this will be one of the first cars I consider, I'll just make sure to keep an eye on the coolant level unlike the last one!

PurelyRetro

7,211 posts

226 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Is it wrong to slightly like the honesty of these cars?

digger_R

1,808 posts

228 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
I had a 216 gsi many moons ago during my last year at university. It cost me a little over £600 in depreciation and servicing in two years and 80k miles. Mine went on to 180k before I clipped a kerb in it and effectively killed it (wasn't economical to repair).

ferrisbueller

30,183 posts

249 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
sniff diesel said:
BlueCello said:
sniff diesel said:
My neighbour's daughter has one of these shape Rovers, a 220 GSi. Overheard her saying "it's not very good on fuel because it's a sports car you see" Yeah right love, course it is rolleyes
Well, 0-60 in under 7 seconds on that model. Not exactly slow! smile
I don't think it's a turbo, might be the 220 GTi rather than GSi then.

Edited by sniff diesel on Wednesday 7th January 22:13
Autocar 4.9.91 220Gti = 8.8 secs, 21.10.92 220 Turbo coupe = 6.3secs

HTH.

fido

18,327 posts

277 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
sniff diesel said:
BlueCello said:
sniff diesel said:
My neighbour's daughter has one of these shape Rovers, a 220 GSi. Overheard her saying "it's not very good on fuel because it's a sports car you see" Yeah right love, course it is rolleyes
Well, 0-60 in under 7 seconds on that model. Not exactly slow! smile
I don't think it's a turbo, might be the 220 GTi rather than GSi then.

Edited by sniff diesel on Wednesday 7th January 22:13
It's also the old Rover T-Series, i think, which isn't that economical. I had the turbo which only did a few mpg worse i.e. low 20s! Might be something to do with the fact that they overfuel the engine to avoid detonation/overheating problems - not that reliable as the heads can blow.

sniff diesel

13,124 posts

234 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
PurelyRetro said:
Is it wrong to slightly like the honesty of these cars?
It's a Rover. Automatic. What's to like?

PurelyRetro

7,211 posts

226 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
sniff diesel said:
PurelyRetro said:
Is it wrong to slightly like the honesty of these cars?
It's a Rover. Automatic. What's to like?
As Ginge R said though, it's an honest car. I did grow to like brother 216Sli by accident paperbag

Ginge R

Original Poster:

4,761 posts

241 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
Darkslider said:
Only criticism is you maybe paid a little too much for it, but I guess the minimum price for any car with decent length tax and test is £300ish so maybe not.

If I were you and was looking for a super cheap Rover I'd have got a bubble shape 200 VI personally. Borrowed one for a few weeks and with a 1.8 Vtec K series engine making 145 odd bhp it was pretty nippy for it's size! If I ever have to go that cheap for bangernomics this will be one of the first cars I consider, I'll just make sure to keep an eye on the coolant level unlike the last one!
Yeah, I've been warned about that coolant business - the head tends to warp on these if you're not careful.

As an aside (Retro), yeah - it is honest. It has a patina that reflects care and a tale to be told and it has been seriously well cared for. I almost got wood yesterday when I saw a Tomcat coupe mind, which does have me slightly worried. The proposed R8 coupe looked half decent for the day/market too.

http://www.aronline.co.uk/index.htm?r8storyf.htm

PurelyRetro

7,211 posts

226 months

Wednesday 7th January 2009
quotequote all
I'm considering bidding:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/1991-ROVER-216-GSI-WHITE-GRE...

Time to check how expensive the insurance will be for me.