Cost per month
Author
Discussion

thinfourth2

Original Poster:

32,414 posts

233 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
Am i the only one here who upon hearing something costs X per month that automatically times it by 10 in your head to get a very rough yearly cost.

Example sky only costs £60 a month but in my head i hear sky costs over £600 a year.

Yes i know there is 12 months but i'm thick and can't quickly multiple by 12 so 10 will do

Captain Cadillac

2,974 posts

216 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
I usually multiply it by 12, but then again, I am rather clever.

Olf

11,978 posts

247 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
Am i the only one here who upon hearing something costs X per month that automatically times it by 10 in your head to get a very rough yearly cost.

Example sky only costs £60 a month but in my head i hear sky costs over £600 a year.

Yes i know there is 12 months but i'm thick and can't quickly multiple by 12 so 10 will do
I can't help multiplying by 10 and then by 50 because I that's hopefully how much longer I'll live, thus Sky subs cost >£30,000. Therefore I do not have Sky.

tonyvid

9,889 posts

272 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
Olf said:
thinfourth2 said:
Am i the only one here who upon hearing something costs X per month that automatically times it by 10 in your head to get a very rough yearly cost.

Example sky only costs £60 a month but in my head i hear sky costs over £600 a year.

Yes i know there is 12 months but i'm thick and can't quickly multiple by 12 so 10 will do
I can't help multiplying by 10 and then by 50 because I that's hopefully how much longer I'll live, thus Sky subs cost >£30,000. Therefore I do not have Sky.
Bloody hell!

Jasandjules

72,580 posts

258 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
Los Angeles said:
To the easily fooled 9.99 is not ten pounds, and by the same yardstick a car offered at 9,999 is a bargain compared to one at ten thousand pounds.
Indeed, and an item on sale at "less than one thousand pounds" will be £999.99.

But yes, I also do the calculations a lot for many things (pet insurance, £60 for a month for one of the dogs = £720 a year, BUT then one Op she had about four years ago was £3400, so that means I am still winning.............)..

trumpet600

3,527 posts

260 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
And how many of you ladies on here see a price of £9.99 and round it 'up' to £9 rather than £10?

Bernie-the-bolt

15,398 posts

279 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
I often round things 'up' from say £299 to £200 when I'm buying something and Mrs b-t-b wants to know how much it is....

Equally if she wanted to buy something at £299 I'd throw a fit because that's the best part of £500 yikes

hehe

Edited by Bernie-the-bolt on Thursday 8th January 08:42

Puff Puff

23,205 posts

255 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
Am i the only one here who upon hearing something costs X per month that automatically times it by 10 in your head to get a very rough yearly cost.
Has the metric year been introduced already? That adds twelve years to my age - but hey, I can now claim my pension and bus pass. woohoo

Mr POD

5,153 posts

221 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
Am i the only one here who upon hearing something costs X per month that automatically times it by 10 in your head to get a very rough yearly cost.

Example sky only costs £60 a month but in my head i hear sky costs over £600 a year.

Yes i know there is 12 months but i'm thick and can't quickly multiple by 12 so 10 will do
I multiply it by 10, get 600, then add 60 get 660 and then add 60 again and get 720 and then I estimate what 30% of it is ( About £210 ) and then add the 210 to the 720 and get £930. Then I round it up to £1000 and say "I have to earn £1000 before tax to get sky ? Er No."

So you think £600 and I think 3% of my earnings or 1.3 hours a week.

That's what I do : work out how many hours I have to work to pay for it.

Strangely Brown

15,636 posts

260 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
Errr... but Sky doesn't cost £60. It only costs that much if you want all the footballists and second rate movies.

Sky+ costs me £21.50 and that's enough.

mouseymousey

2,642 posts

266 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
Personally I don't bother. The monthly cost is more important to me than the yearly cost.

However, if I wanted to work it out I would do this...

60 * 12 =
120 * 6 =
240 * 3 =
720.

FPC

8,274 posts

251 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
Strangely Brown said:
Errr... but Sky doesn't cost £60. It only costs that much if you want all the footballists and second rate movies.

Sky+ costs me £21.50 and that's enough.
Or nothing if you just watch free to air / free to view smile

Salgar

3,285 posts

213 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
lovefilm and a bluray player tbh.

ChapppeRS

4,483 posts

220 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
[quote=Mr PODI multiply it by 10, get 600, then add 60 get 660 and then add 60 again and get 720 and then I estimate what 30% of it is ( About £210 ) and then add the 210 to the 720 and get £930. Then I round it up to £1000 and say "I have to earn £1000 before tax to get sky ? Er No."

So you think £600 and I think 3% of my earnings or 1.3 hours a week.

That's what I do : work out how many hours I have to work to pay for it.
[/quote]

Now all we have to do is work out how to get paid for watching 2 hours of sky TV.... this time next year... miwyonnaires

uriel

3,244 posts

280 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
mouseymousey said:
Personally I don't bother. The monthly cost is more important to me than the yearly cost.

However, if I wanted to work it out I would do this...

60 * 12 =
120 * 6 =
240 * 3 =
720.
How strange. I'd do...

6 *12 =
72 * 10 =
720

Interesting seeing how someone else thinks.

Mandat

4,615 posts

267 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
mouseymousey said:
Personally I don't bother. The monthly cost is more important to me than the yearly cost.

However, if I wanted to work it out I would do this...

60 * 12 =
120 * 6 =
240 * 3 =
720.
I'd find it easier to work out by mentally calculating ....

60 * 10 = 600

plus

60 * 2 = 120

ytrebil

792 posts

215 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
People who don’t have sky because “it’s a rip off” make me laugh! I think the full ‘works’ with all the channels is between 40-60 a month depending on if you have Sky+ and a couple of other things. When you consider the amount of channels you get its good value IMO! There are always movies on with no adverts to break them up, loads of sports channels, all the documentary channels and pretty much everything in between. Especially when you consider people pay £40+ for a gym membership every month they never use! I watch Sky channels all the time (football last night + Men Behaving Badly on GOLD + Space documentary about the Rovers on Mars on National Geographic). As we have multi-room, other members of the household were watching a movie. It works out at around £2/day for our package.

We also have Sky+ which is dead handy for recording say a UFC event so I can watch it the next day and FF all the adverts out of it.

I personally think Sky is great!

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

246 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
ytrebil said:
People who don’t have sky because “it’s a rip off” make me laugh! I think the full ‘works’ with all the channels is between 40-60 a month depending on if you have Sky+ and a couple of other things. When you consider the amount of channels you get its good value IMO! There are always movies on with no adverts to break them up, loads of sports channels, all the documentary channels and pretty much everything in between. Especially when you consider people pay £40+ for a gym membership every month they never use! I watch Sky channels all the time (football last night + Men Behaving Badly on GOLD + Space documentary about the Rovers on Mars on National Geographic). As we have multi-room, other members of the household were watching a movie. It works out at around £2/day for our package.

We also have Sky+ which is dead handy for recording say a UFC event so I can watch it the next day and FF all the adverts out of it.

I personally think Sky is great!
You seem to be assuming everybody wants to watch telly for hours on end. I don't.

ytrebil

792 posts

215 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
Oh and FWIW I only go on monthly figures as I get paid monthly and multiplying it by 12 months / 50 years / whateverothernumberyouwanttoinsert is pointless as it's irrelevant unless you know how much your net pay is and what you can afford on a yearly / lifetime / whatever basis.

kambites

71,446 posts

250 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
uriel said:
How strange. I'd do...

6 *12 =
72 * 10 =
Erm... smile