Is this photo too naughty?

[malc350]

I have added a Fashion, Glamour, Portraiture folder to my Flickr account as I want to showcase different skills of mine (or not as the case may be!)

Anyway this photo was taken from a set I shot a while ago and is actually the tamest pic from the set and virtually the only one I can publish on a free gallery like Flickr.

I'd like to use it because it shows I can put together a studio set and take "tasteful, erotic glamour" (OK let's not get too pretentious here...)

Do you think this pic is a little naughty and "revealing" even though you can't see anything as such?(you know what I'm talking about...!)

Just interested in opinions really and whether I should keep it on there:

MOD NOTE: NSFW http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3385/3184013001_b76...

MOD NOTE: NSFW From this set: http://www.flickr.com/photos/malc350/sets/72157612...

Malc

Edited by malc350 on Saturday 10th January 13:28

[roy e6]

Looks alright to me Its tame compared to some i've seen on flicker.

[Mr Edd]

There's nothing to worry about seen worse in The Sun

[kybo]

Definitely keep it on there

I do wonder if the shot would have been less 'sleazy' looking (if that's the right word i'm after) if she wasn't parting her cheeks, so to speak.

Just my humble opinion.

Edited by kybo on Saturday 10th January 19:24

[GetCarter]

Just very, very poor choice of shoes.

She wouldn't last 20 metres up here.

[poah]

the fact she ios pulling her thigh back revealing her gusset makes it look like the start of a porn shoot TBH

[andy-xr]

I'd filter it if you havent done already

flickr said:

Safety Level
Safe - Content suitable for a global, public audience
Moderate - If you're not sure whether your content is suitable for a global, public audience but you think that it doesn't need to be restricted per se, this category is for you
Restricted - This is content you probably wouldn't show to your mum, and definitely shouldn't be seen by kids

[malc350]

Yeah, it's the right shot for what was required at the time I just didn't know if I could get away with it in a more "mainstream" portfolio.

I guess at worse it's a bit naughty, that's all. I didn't think it would really offend anyone one here.

Malc

[Simpo Two]

Funny how the world seems to be getting more prudish - The Sun has been topless since about 1976!

[malc350]

Simpo Two said:

Funny how the world seems to be getting more prudish - The Sun has been topless since about 1976!

That's true, I'm not sure if I put the question right initially. What I meant to say was I thought the pose in my "questionable" pic was a bit "porno" though it's nothing in the scheme of things, probably about as daring as Twiggy & co's M&S ad!

It's funny we do have a bit of a double standards world, one minute everyone's prudish the next anything goes, remember when it was trendy for people, even teenagers, to wear the "pornstar" teeshirt?!!!

Malc

[Rav]

Nice photo, leave it there.
She is very pretty and a womans body is a work of art.

If anyones got an issue close the window.

[paddy27]

Y

Rav said:

Nice photo, leave it there.
She is very pretty and a womans body is a work of art.

If anyones got an issue close the window.

I tend to agree. Thinks its a very good photo.

[JonRB]

When you have "Jasmine" in quotes, are you saying she's a t-girl? Cos that's pretty impressive if she is.

Edit: If that was one of my Flickr pics, I'd tag it as "moderate" and not "safe".

Edited by JonRB on Saturday 10th January 22:47

[malc350]

JonRB said:

When you have "Jasmine" in quotes, are you saying she's a t-girl? Cos that's pretty impressive if she is.

Edit: If that was one of my Flickr pics, I'd tag it as "moderate" and not "safe".

Edited by JonRB on Saturday 10th January 22:47

OMG I have changed it and got rid of the quotes. No she's definitely female! The quotes were kind of tongue in cheek 'cos I knew it was not her real name but the name she used for modelling. You gotta think laterally nowadays...!!!

[JonRB]

malc350 said:

OMG I have changed it and got rid of the quotes. No she's definitely female! The quotes were kind of tongue in cheek 'cos I knew it was not her real name but the name she used for modelling. You gotta think laterally nowadays...!!!

Oopsie. I am so sorry! LOL

[odyssey2200]

malc350 said:

is actually the tamest pic from the set and virtually the only one I can publish on a free gallery like Flickr.

So what are the rest like?

[BMWBen]

Nobody else noticed that she's wearing an engagement ring? Odd thing to have on at a porno shoot!

[CivicMan]

I thnk we need a closer shot of her ring .......

[paul911]

CivicMan said:

I thnk we need a closer shot of her ring .......

[malc350]

CivicMan said:

I thnk we need a closer shot of her ring .......

Trust you to lower the tone to somewhere below ground level

One thing I know is I need to take more "erotic lingerie" images if I want to get my galleries viewed: I don't suppose this has all come from PH but my "Fashion, Glamour, Portraiture" gallery, currently containing only 4 images, has been viewed more than 500 times in 24 hours, whereas my entire gallery of all pics, has been viewed only 900 times in 2 weeks.

I will be spicing up my site soon...!