Time to start a campaign of hate against god believers
Time to start a campaign of hate against god believers
Author
Discussion

mattikake

Original Poster:

5,110 posts

228 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
http://uk.tv.yahoo.com/blog/article/104744/

Just goes to show how stupid religion makes you, and what a moral crime it is turn the most intelligent lifeform we know into ... turd.

Enough of this religious numb nuttery! mad

OJ

14,209 posts

257 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
You would say that you retarded monkey fish-frog!

hehe

Rawwr

22,722 posts

263 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
I never fail to be amused by the irony of religious people telling atheists to burn in hell.

Fuzzy Wuzzy

623 posts

219 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
Calm down dear, starting this 'campaign' makes you as bad as 'them'.

Do you see?

Tampon

4,637 posts

254 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
Comment from the article

"THEY ARE FREAK RELIGIOUS HEAD CASES, THEY SHOULD BURN IN HELL"

Irony, I love it.


barney123

495 posts

240 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all

Tampon

4,637 posts

254 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
Rawwr said:
I never fail to be amused by the irony of religious people telling atheists to burn in hell.
Thats not ironic, religious people believe that people who don;t follow god will go to hell.

What is ironic is a atheist ranting about "religious nuts" and saying they should burn in a hell he doesn't believe in ?

barney123

495 posts

240 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
Tampon said:
Rawwr said:
I never fail to be amused by the irony of religious people telling atheists to burn in hell.
Thats not ironic, religious people believe that people who don;t follow god will go to hell.

What is ironic is a atheist ranting about "religious nuts" and saying they should burn in a hell he doesn't believe in ?
Might just be my opinion, but if heaven is full of those types, I prefer the alternative.

Cheeky Jim

1,276 posts

309 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
Lets not start this again.

Religion and Politics shouldn't be discussed in polite company...

As none of you are polite, it's a bit downhill from now on.


For what it's worth, I do agree with you...

garycat

5,365 posts

239 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
Isn't there a law against this sort of thing?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_and_Religious_...

...ahhh maybe not.

I think a campaign of ridicule may be more effective.

Edited by garycat on Tuesday 27th January 16:01

jesta1865

3,453 posts

238 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
i love this comment

'Sir David is a national treasure and it should be a crime to send him hate mail.'

actually its a crime to send anyone hate mail you plank.

still like DA's argument against a god smile

mattikake

Original Poster:

5,110 posts

228 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
Fuzzy Wuzzy said:
Calm down dear, starting this 'campaign' makes you as bad as 'them'.

Do you see?
Aye. Time to use a primitive language they understand. Fighting fire with fire.

If many of them die... well, where's the harm in that?

We surived the Black Death. We had the Renaissance. We've been through the Age of Enlightenment. The Age of Reason is long gone. We're now in the Information Age. Tiem for that to end and enter the Age of the end of excuses for stupidity...

scorp

8,783 posts

258 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
I agree, hassling Attenborough over crap like this is bang out of order, the guy is a legend.

shoot

Tony*T3

20,911 posts

276 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
scorp said:
I agree, hassling Attenborough over crap like this is bang out of order, the guy is a legend.

shoot
he's a God.

ct_

108 posts

213 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
mattikake:
Tiem for that to end and enter the Age of the end of excuses for stupidity


Amen!

sorry, couldn't resist.


Fuzzy Wuzzy

623 posts

219 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
mattikake said:
Fuzzy Wuzzy said:
Calm down dear, starting this 'campaign' makes you as bad as 'them'.

Do you see?
Aye. Time to use a primitive language they understand. Fighting fire with fire.

If many of them die... well, where's the harm in that?

We surived the Black Death. We had the Renaissance. We've been through the Age of Enlightenment. The Age of Reason is long gone. We're now in the Information Age. Tiem for that to end and enter the Age of the end of excuses for stupidity...
Erm, ok.

Could you (i.e. the athiest extremists) and them (religious extremists) go to the Moon and fight 'fire with fire' out there, let everyone else get on with their lives. Might even make a nice night time show for us back on Earth.

Cheers.

jesta1865

3,453 posts

238 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
Tony*T3 said:
scorp said:
I agree, hassling Attenborough over crap like this is bang out of order, the guy is a legend.

shoot
he's a God.
oh very good, very good indeed smile


Nobody You Know

8,422 posts

222 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
Fuzzy Wuzzy said:
Calm down dear, starting this 'campaign' makes you as bad as 'them'.

Do you see?
Do we have a Digitiser fan here?

moc-moc-a-moc?

Don

28,378 posts

313 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
mattikake said:
http://uk.tv.yahoo.com/blog/article/104744/

Just goes to show how stupid religion makes you, and what a moral crime it is turn the most intelligent lifeform we know into ... turd.

Enough of this religious numb nuttery! mad
What? Are you going to send the Archbishop of Canterbury 'I don't believe in God mail?' roflrofl

MattikakeMightHaveWritten said:
Dear Archbish,

I know you're a nice chap'n'evryfink but you're a bit mistaken about God and Darwin. Errm. No. Darwin isn't a God or anything he had a really good theory. And we all reckon it's true. Even some of your Christians reckon it's true as well!

But some nutters have been writing to Attenborough and saying he ought to credit God in his TV programms, innit!

So I think your're a tt.

Signed,

Matt
MattikakeMightHaveWritten said:
Dear Archbish,

I didn't know you thought Darwin probably has it right as well.

And it's very nice to kno you hold me in such high regard. It's nice to hear you think of me the same I think of you.

Are you sure these nutters are just nutters? They just like writing to important people to gratify their inner insecurities?

Signed,

Matt
MattikakeMightHaveWritten said:
Dear Archbish,

I have heard of irony. It's like steely but rustier an' brown coloured.

Signed,

Matt
No offence. biggrin

Poor old DA. Dealing with keyboard warriors...

Don't worry. They're just nutters.

mattikake

Original Poster:

5,110 posts

228 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
garycat said:
Isn't there a law against this sort of thing?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_and_Religious_...

...ahhh maybe not.

I think a campaign of ridicule may be more effective.

Edited by garycat on Tuesday 27th January 16:01
Ah yes, a law that makes it ok for the religous fkwits to hate non-believers, but does not allow non-believers to hate them back. That's an impartial law! Anti-human. How are we going to keep our wars going if non-believers are not allowed to hate back?!

Seriously (as I've been speaking in ironic jest!):
A law or contract born out duress or terrorism, should not be recognised by those with a higher sense of morality. I ask if it is even morally legal? In the long run it serves to create divide, not cure it, as one side has a legal higher ground over the otherand is just a matter of time before it gets abused (see OT for e.g.). It should be changed to imply that no hatred may be born over religious matters (but they know that would be impossible. And thus, I come full-circle).

For one thing, ridicule has got us nowhere, but what the hey, it's legal!

Edited by mattikake on Tuesday 27th January 16:32