Moved threads
Author
Discussion

skeggysteve

Original Poster:

5,724 posts

246 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
As you know when you click on a 'moved' thread it takes you to a page that you have to click on the link again to get to the thread.

Would it not be better just to link to the moved thread?

Or at least give a (humorous?) reason why the thread was moved?

Sorry if it's been mentioned before.

Big Al.

69,336 posts

287 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
It's all down to available time; with the vast number of threads posted daily the 20ish moderator do not have the time to explain why the thread was moved.

It would be far easier for the OP to post in the correct forum in the first place.

HTH.

skeggysteve

Original Poster:

5,724 posts

246 months

Tuesday 27th January 2009
quotequote all
Al,

It was more of a question for RP & Mr Will, as their not that busy at the moment wink.

I meant a standard message, a bit like the vote one does but the question was more about 'why does it need two clicks to get to the thread?'

But I do agree with:
"It would be far easier for the OP to post in the correct forum in the first place."
I reported one the other day, car question posted in website feedback. scratchchin

Mr Will

13,719 posts

235 months

Wednesday 28th January 2009
quotequote all
It's all down to the way the forums are coded. Each topic/post can only exist in one place at a time and there is no easy way add anything to a forum which is not a thread. This means that the only simple solution is to create a new topic telling everyone that the original one has been moved and containing a link.

It does also allow the mods to post a message it they feel it is necessary, although this is admittedly rare.