How can this be? Freedom of choice suspended?
How can this be? Freedom of choice suspended?
Author
Discussion

TWSTEEL

Original Poster:

1,099 posts

218 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all

Agree with the decision of the BBC or not this is a ridiculous situation.

The BBC has been forced to suspend an internal investigation into the Gaza aid appeal controversy after being threatened with legal action.

A special committee set up by the BBC Trust was due to report next week on the corporation's decision not to broadcast an appeal by the Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC), which prompted more than 15,000 complaints.
However, the process was halted when the BBC received a letter from a firm of solicitors threatening to take the corporation to judicial review if it does not screen the appeal.
The letter, from London law firm Hickman & Rose, was sent on behalf of two Gaza residents and one British citizen. It is understood to claim that the BBC's actions were "irrational or unlawful" and breached the European Convention of Human Rights.

AJS-

15,366 posts

265 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Bizzare. I reckon my human rights are infringed by TV constantly showing Britain's Chaviest tt, while continually refusing to fund my AJS- Does Le Mans 24 hours documentary.

Astacus

3,737 posts

263 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
TWSTEEL said:
Agree with the decision of the BBC or not this is a ridiculous situation.

The BBC has been forced to suspend an internal investigation into the Gaza aid appeal controversy after being threatened with legal action.

A special committee set up by the BBC Trust was due to report next week on the corporation's decision not to broadcast an appeal by the Disasters Emergency Committee (DEC), which prompted more than 15,000 complaints.
However, the process was halted when the BBC received a letter from a firm of solicitors threatening to take the corporation to judicial review if it does not screen the appeal.
The letter, from London law firm Hickman & Rose, was sent on behalf of two Gaza residents and one British citizen. It is understood to claim that the BBC's actions were "irrational or unlawful" and breached the European Convention of Human Rights.
Ohhh this'llbegood.
: popcorn smiley:

Edited by Astacus on Friday 30th January 23:27

voyds9

8,490 posts

312 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
What next compulsory donations

odyssey2200

18,650 posts

238 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
Well just to prove the point, even if they show it I will turn off.

regardless of the rights or wrongs of Gaza this is redcard


pokethepope

2,667 posts

217 months

Friday 30th January 2009
quotequote all
So did the BBC stop the investigation because they think they would lose the court battle if it ever got taken that far, or do they not want to risk the costs/more bad publicity?

Chris_w666

22,655 posts

228 months

Saturday 31st January 2009
quotequote all
How can a business refusing to do something be unlawful? The BBC wanted to remain impartial surely that is their choice?

The people infringing human rights are those responsible for the situation in Gaza on both sides of the argument. Or are the Match of the Day, Top Gear, and Ground Force producers now war criminals?

Captain Cadillac

2,974 posts

216 months

Saturday 31st January 2009
quotequote all
This is flat-out disgusting.

Another $100 to the JDF from me for this stupidity.

TWSTEEL

Original Poster:

1,099 posts

218 months

Saturday 31st January 2009
quotequote all
odyssey2200 said:
Well just to prove the point, even if they show it I will turn off.

regardless of the rights or wrongs of Gaza this is redcard
+1

Sorry but had to retire up the wooden hill after posting :yawn:

elster

17,517 posts

239 months

Saturday 31st January 2009
quotequote all
I would of stopped the investigation at that point. I would also of sent a letter back stating that no one tells us what to put on, this isn't a dictatorship.

If they do have to show it, I hope it is a 3am Monday morning viewing only.

TWSTEEL

Original Poster:

1,099 posts

218 months

Saturday 31st January 2009
quotequote all
Next it'll be a case of " You WILL show the Party Political Broadcast of the Attila the Hun Peace Party"

Edited by TWSTEEL on Saturday 31st January 09:22

paoloh

8,617 posts

233 months

Saturday 31st January 2009
quotequote all
I am going to go and film myself masturbating and then threaten to sue the beeb unless it airs it before the new series of Top Gear..................

johnfm

13,751 posts

279 months

Saturday 31st January 2009
quotequote all
can't see how a judicial review can be applied to the actions of a broadcaster. A local authority, or council or a government department.

But I'm not sure the BBC, even though it is funded by a licence fee, can be the subject of 'judicial review'.

Daft.

metro lover

553 posts

216 months

Saturday 31st January 2009
quotequote all
don't these people have anything better to do? you'd have thought so wouldn't you