Britain's Secret Nuclear Landmines
Britain's Secret Nuclear Landmines
Author
Discussion

Bushmaster

Original Poster:

27,580 posts

308 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all


Back in the Cold War, some brown-overalled, pipe-smoking British boffins planned to bury massive nuclear landmines in Germany to blow any advancing Soviet horde to kingdom-come. Along with half of Germany, of course.

They planned to stop the landmines' clockwork timers from freezing in winter by installing chicken cages over them.

They called it 'Blue Peacock'.

I don't know what was in those pipes that boffins smoked in the 1950's, but it must have been bloody good stuff.

http://www.damninteresting.net/content/blue_peacoc...



Edited by Bushmaster on Sunday 1st February 14:01

aciddrop616

1,981 posts

222 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
all that would have been needed back in the day would be a big comedy hand sign pointing down saying "do not step here, nuclear landmine in place" and as we all know, everyone has to do the opposite of what a sign says. then BOOM!! you suddenly go 50ft up and 100ft everywhere

Edited by aciddrop616 on Sunday 1st February 14:05

Asterix

24,438 posts

257 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
Tactical nukes - nothing new with that.

We knew of them when I was serving in Germany back in the early 90's.

TheEnd

15,370 posts

217 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
Bushmaster said:
They planned to stop the landmines' clockwork timers from freezing in winter by installing chicken cages over them.

They called it 'Blue Peacock'.
they installed chickens IN them, ie sealed a live one inside the bomb!

SleeperCell

5,591 posts

271 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
damninteresting, I love that site biggrin

DrTre

12,957 posts

261 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
So, in effect they were nuclear bombs with cluckwork timers?

TWSTEEL

1,099 posts

218 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
DrTre said:
So, in effect they were nuclear bombs with cluckwork timers?
Oh God that was corny biggrin

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

233 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
i always wondered where the saying " theres more then one way to cook an egg" came from

Anyway it wasn't just our side that was mad

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=afJ18eJeNgU

XJSJohn

16,151 posts

248 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
Asterix said:
Tactical nukes
Always wondered what one of them was .....

Live and learn ...

Carry on thumbup

TWSTEEL

1,099 posts

218 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
XJSJohn said:
Asterix said:
Tactical nukes
Always wondered what one of them was .....

Live and learn ...

Carry on thumbup
Now if you want a REAL tactical nuke try this one. About one third the power of the Hiroshima bomb eek

Currently in production by Al Qaeda ready for 2012 perhaps? (Don's tinfoil hat)


Bushmaster

Original Poster:

27,580 posts

308 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
TWSTEEL said:
Don's tinfoil hat
Haven't you got your own?


smile

DrTre

12,957 posts

261 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
TWSTEEL said:
I can spot a fairly major design flaw in that bomb...

Tactical nukes are class. Wasn't there a nuclear artillery shell? Davy Crockett? Or something...

I mean, bloody hell, once you're onto chucking those things about the battlefield then it all changes a bit doesn't it?

TWSTEEL

1,099 posts

218 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
Bushmaster said:
TWSTEEL said:
Don's tinfoil hat
Haven't you got your own?


smile
biggrin

Bushmaster

Original Poster:

27,580 posts

308 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
DrTre said:
TWSTEEL said:
I can spot a fairly major design flaw in that bomb...

Tactical nukes are class. Wasn't there a nuclear artillery shell? Davy Crockett? Or something...

I mean, bloody hell, once you're onto chucking those things about the battlefield then it all changes a bit doesn't it?
Like the lumps of Uranium 235 that should be inside the tube, not outside of it?


TWSTEEL

1,099 posts

218 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
DrTre said:
I mean, bloody hell, once you're onto chucking those things about the battlefield then it all changes a bit doesn't it?
Brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "handbags at twenty paces" biggrin

ShadownINja

79,992 posts

311 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
TWSTEEL said:
Currently in production by Al Qaeda ready for 2012 perhaps?
Suicide chicken bombers?

TWSTEEL

1,099 posts

218 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
ShadownINja said:
TWSTEEL said:
Currently in production by Al Qaeda ready for 2012 perhaps?
Suicide chicken bombers?
Well it would certainly flatten more than a double decker - and no smutty or chocolate comments please biggrin

marvelharvey

1,869 posts

279 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
DrTre said:
TWSTEEL said:
Tactical nukes are class. Wasn't there a nuclear artillery shell? Davy Crockett? Or something...
Yes, the Davy Crockett and its one very fatal design flaw... it's range was so short, that whoever pressed the fire button would have been caught in the resultant fallout.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=khyZI3RK2lE

Silent1

19,762 posts

264 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
It's russia's nuclear briefcases you want to be stting about, not these wannabes.

TWSTEEL

1,099 posts

218 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
Silent1 said:
It's russia's nuclear briefcases you want to be stting about, not these wannabes.
Too late for that - they're already here.

Didn't you see Telefon?