If you could change one thing about F1 cars...?
Discussion
I'd ban pit stops for fuel; what you start with is what you have to deal with.
This- IMVHO - has added benefits. You see car & driver vs car & driver. The variable of the pit crew is taken out of he equation. Also, teams will then engineer their car to suit a particular consumption of fuel. Aero will vary from team to team, and teams would use a V8, others a V10, others a V12. In varying capacities of no more than - say - 3.5 litres.
This- IMVHO - has added benefits. You see car & driver vs car & driver. The variable of the pit crew is taken out of he equation. Also, teams will then engineer their car to suit a particular consumption of fuel. Aero will vary from team to team, and teams would use a V8, others a V10, others a V12. In varying capacities of no more than - say - 3.5 litres.
It's easy to believe that it was all better 20 years ago, but a modern GP car is still hugely spectacular. Personally, I'd make them significantly quicker. I'd ban all upper body wings and allow under body downforce only. I would prefer an open engine formula, but allow limited fuel and no pitstops; 6, 8, 10, 12 cylinders, whatever you like! I'd want about 1,200bhp to make it really interesting, but similar downforce to 2009-specification, all from ground effect. KERS would be encouraged, as I think the sport needs to be progressive, rather than regressive. One concession to the past I would like to see is steel brakes to increase braking distances and encourage a bit of overtaking.
1,200bhp in the rain around Monaco with steel brakes would sort the men from the boys. Imagine if taking Eau Rouge flat became a challenge again...
1,200bhp in the rain around Monaco with steel brakes would sort the men from the boys. Imagine if taking Eau Rouge flat became a challenge again...
Abolishion of all rules except one, no fuel stops. You're allocated a set amount of fuel and that's it. How you use that is entirely up to you. Want a 1500hp turbo monster, knock yourself out, but you've got to finish... With a set amount of fuel maybe you'd adjust the power on the fly, why not? Sounds like fun. But yeah, anything else goes; 2 foot wide slicks, uber wingage. As long as it's not deemed as being unsafe, let it pass. This is supposed to be the pinnacle of motorsport, let it be that. Not a one make series.
Edited by juansolo on Monday 2nd February 10:43
juansolo said:
Abolishion of all rules except one, no fuel stops. You're allocated a set amount of fuel and that's it. How you use that is entirely up to you. Want a 1500hp turbo monster, knock yourself out, but you've got to finish... With a set amount of fuel maybe you'd adjust the power on the fly, why not? Sounds like fun. But yeah, anything else goes; 2 foot wide slicks, uber wingage. As long as it's not deemed as being unsafe, let it pass. This is supposed to be the pinnacle of motorsport, let it be that. Not a one make series.
Was it in '86 when the fuel limit meant all the cars would have to tour round economically and it totally ruined the show. I think it was the williams that was the most efficient, but the races generally ended with the front runners stopping before the end. You want people to race, so I dont think econimcal driving is the way ahead.Edited by juansolo on Monday 2nd February 10:43
Maybe front mounted machine guns, but then no one would want to drive the safety car!
Gassing Station | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





