156 SW v Saloon
Author
Discussion

indigorallye

Original Poster:

555 posts

246 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2009
quotequote all
According to Parkers.co.uk the saloon (378 litres) has more luggage space than the SW (360 litres)!
Can anyone shed any light on this?
Surely the SW is bigger??
I'm confused.

RicksAlfas

14,256 posts

265 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2009
quotequote all
The Sportwagon is measured with the load cover pulled shut and in this guise it is fractionally smaller than the saloon. Obviously however the load cover can be opened to allow loading up to the roof and the seats can be folded to give an almost flat floor. The saloon rear seats are fixed.

indigorallye

Original Poster:

555 posts

246 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2009
quotequote all
Ahh, thankyou.
SW it is then!

RicksAlfas

14,256 posts

265 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2009
quotequote all
indigorallye said:
SW it is then!
That's the correct choice.
biggrin

Mr E

22,671 posts

280 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2009
quotequote all
'tis an amusing statistic though. A large estate it is not.

Which is fine, as we didn't want a large estate. It takes 2 bikes, that'll do.

RicksAlfas

14,256 posts

265 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2009
quotequote all
Mr E said:
A large estate it is not.
It's a 5 door coupe!

Still the best looking mass produced car - ever.

indigorallye

Original Poster:

555 posts

246 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2009
quotequote all
With a second child imminent I need something a little bit bigger than the current taxi (Passat saloon) and a GTa SW ticks all the boxes that I want/ need from a car.

V6Alfisti

3,313 posts

248 months

Tuesday 3rd February 2009
quotequote all
The main benefit of a SW over a Saloon are the split fold rear seats.

Always seemed an odd choice when even the Alfa GT had split fold rears!

RicksAlfas

14,256 posts

265 months

Wednesday 4th February 2009
quotequote all
indigorallye said:
With a second child imminent I need something a little bit bigger than the current taxi (Passat saloon) and a GTa SW ticks all the boxes that I want/ need from a car.
Just be careful. A 156 is a fair bit smaller than a Passat!

MarkwG

5,798 posts

210 months

Wednesday 4th February 2009
quotequote all
"A 156 is a fair bit smaller than a Passat!"

Yep, I'd echo that, with experience of both.

2 adults + 2 kids: the Alfa's fine around town, & for trips to friends & relatives for the day.

For the following I need to add:
a tow hitch rack for trips into the woods with the bikes;
a roofbox for longer trips (& its a biggie!)

Both for longer holiday trips.

A trailer for taking sh!t to the tip;

The Passat can swallow most of that without blinking. And it feels like it has better leg room in the back, the Alfa can feel quite cozy. The Alfas rear hatch is usually the limiting factor, & the rake angle of the rear screen limits as well. As said before, it's a five door coupe (long before Mercedes "invented" that weird CLS thing hehe)

velocemitch

4,019 posts

241 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
indigorallye said:
With a second child imminent I need something a little bit bigger than the current taxi (Passat saloon) and a GTa SW ticks all the boxes that I want/ need from a car.
Yes it ticked my boxes well too, until the fuel prices started to get a bit high for my 18K a year.
Brilliant car, not as spacious as a Passat, but bags more character and in another league as far as performance goes.

indigorallye

Original Poster:

555 posts

246 months

Sunday 8th February 2009
quotequote all
Thanks, I'm all confused now as a 156 saloon has come up at a good price!

jwyatt

570 posts

242 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
The 156SW is in some ways a sort of 5-door coupe, but it has a hell of a lot more space in the boot than the saloon, even with the seats in place (I had a saloon for 3 years, and have now had the GTA SW for 4 years). That luggage capacity stat is just one of the many things dredged up by lazy journos and used to sg off Alfas.

Unlike in the 159, the 156 SW's back seats fold flat, too, meaning it is more useful than it might first appear. The whole car is very compact, but that is a huge part of it's appeal - very few hatches out there have the same quality, class, looks, and big NA engine, and too many estates are hearse-shaped and too big for my needs.

Alfa_75_Steve

7,489 posts

221 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
We've had a saloon and a SW.

I wouldn't swap my SW for a saloon.

Had a B6 Passat before I bought the SW, which was nowhere near as useful, despite the bloody massive boot and folding rear seats.

Currently driving a MkII Focus Estate (still have the SW, though!) - which towers over the 156!

Si 330

1,306 posts

230 months

Sunday 22nd February 2009
quotequote all
I loved my SW but we had problems getting a good fit for the kids car seats.
Check first before buying.

flattotheboards

6,688 posts

227 months

Tuesday 24th February 2009
quotequote all
You have got to go for the sportwagon looks so good! Heres some pictures of my dads old one.









Does anybody know of this car as I was wondering if anybody on here bought it.