Bus Wars - The Christians Fight Back
Bus Wars - The Christians Fight Back
Author
Discussion

tinman0

Original Poster:

18,231 posts

269 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
3 Christian groups are fielding 175 buses in retaliation to the "God probably doesn't exist" adverts.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1136162/Th...

I can only see one winner here. The bus companies!

Marf

22,907 posts

270 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Doesnt advertising have to be true? scratchchin

Hmm I think I'll complain about these adverts and ask them to prove their claims to the ASA hehe

2something

2,145 posts

237 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Looks like false advertising, I think they are likely to get more complaints than the humanists did.

You only have to ask them to 'prove it', so it could be a bit of an own goal...

voyds9

8,490 posts

312 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
"There definitely is a god"

I hope they can substantiate that in court.

Iain H

390 posts

222 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Who gives a fk!! If they believe there is a God it is up to them, but why do they feel the need to tell us he exists?? I think they protest too much!! I am sure they could spend their money in a wiser way!!

tinman0

Original Poster:

18,231 posts

269 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Trouble is that the anti God guys couldn't prove that God didn't exist, and got a ruling from the ASA that it was just opinion anyway, just like this will be ruled as an opinion hehe

Galileo

3,147 posts

247 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
I agree. The Atheists used "probably" where the god bothers used "definitely". That's false advertising as it can't be proved.


anonymous-user

83 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
I'm thinking of forking out for a series of "I don't give a st, and most other people probably don't either" adverts.

Neil_H

15,418 posts

280 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
Trouble is that the anti God guys couldn't prove that God didn't exist, and got a ruling from the ASA that it was just opinion anyway, just like this will be ruled as an opinion hehe
But they said 'probably' not 'definitely', showing a far more open-minded view.

I'll be complaining about these as long as it can be done online, otherwise I can't be arsed. It's time people stood up to religious fkwits bullying people with their retarded views.

Marf

22,907 posts

270 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
Trouble is that the anti God guys couldn't prove that God didn't exist, and got a ruling from the ASA that it was just opinion anyway, just like this will be ruled as an opinion hehe
True enough, but the anti god guys qualified their statement with "probably" which is what got them off the hook.

If they had put "there definitely is no god" the complaints would have in all likelihood been upheld.

Fetchez la vache

5,897 posts

243 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
Trouble is that the anti God guys couldn't prove that God didn't exist, and got a ruling from the ASA that it was just opinion anyway, just like this will be ruled as an opinion hehe
I thought there was a case in Italy last year where a priest had to prove that he DID exist?

Balmoral Green

42,561 posts

277 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Hmmm.

The Humanists slogan said "There's probably no god".

If the Christians want to retaliate, the very best that they could do is counter claim with "There probably is a god".

I think either slogan is reasonable, but I strongly object to the use of the word is in place of probably, I don't think it is reasonable for them to use that word, the Humanists didn't.

Edited by Balmoral Green on Thursday 5th February 14:21

Marf

22,907 posts

270 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Does it matter?

Life's too short to be getting upset about such nonsense.

Busa_Rush

6,930 posts

280 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Balmoral Green said:
... the Humanists didn't.
The Humanists are too self centred to see the clear evidence of a God smile It's all around you smile


Busa_Rush

6,930 posts

280 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Does it matter?
Of course it does. It's what makes life life smile

tinman0

Original Poster:

18,231 posts

269 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Balmoral Green said:
Hmmm.

The Humanists slogan said "There's probably no god".

If the Christians want to retaliate, the very best that they could do is counter claim with "There probably is a god".

I think either slogan is reasonable, but I strongly object to the use of the word is in place of probably, I don't think it is reasonable for them to use that word, the Humanists didn't.
They wouldn't be very good Christians if they said "there probably is a God" now would they? lol

The hypocrisy on this thread is delightful. As you were. hehe

Fittster

20,120 posts

242 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Does it matter?

Life's too short to be getting upset about such nonsense.
But what about the afterlife?

Eric Mc

125,606 posts

294 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Busa_Rush said:
Eric Mc said:
Does it matter?
Of course it does. It's what makes life life smile
I thought sex made life - to be scientific (unless you're an amoeba - of course).

Quaint

658 posts

223 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Busa_Rush said:
The Humanists are too self centred to see the clear evidence of a God smile It's all around you smile
Example?