I have a plan to save the UK's economy
I have a plan to save the UK's economy
Author
Discussion

skip_1

Original Poster:

3,514 posts

219 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Now with the government spunking money all over the place buying out banks and loaning companies money they'll probably never see back why don't they just give the money to the people?


I realise this could be quite expensive and difficult to set up but they could give every adult in Britain (I don't know the figures but say 45million over 18's) £20,000 each £950b if my sums are correct (surely affordable). They could distribute this through the banks that they now own. People would have to register or it could be done via National Insurance numbers (it could be a condition that when you register you get an ID card - they'd like that). The money couldn't be withdrawn but could be used for purchases such as Cars, houses, or used for electronics, DIY etc. They could even add a further £5k bonus if you buy a UK built car for instance.

This would hopefully have the effect of people spending again and the economic situation improving. After 5 years the government could claim back any money left in the accounts and would also recieve VAT etc, so would get a fair chunk back in the long run. They could even give people much more money if the theory is sound!

Hopefully that all makes sense. Feel free to tear my plan to shreds (first post probably!). I'm not an economist but this could make Brown look like a real world saving hero just like he wants and me look historically more important than say Malthus or Adam Smith!



Edited by skip_1 on Thursday 5th February 23:05

johnfm

13,751 posts

279 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
they already give £20k a year to thousands and thousands of scroungers. it doesn't seem to be working.

Hedders

24,460 posts

276 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Another way to do it.

They could just get rid of the income tax office and make us produce receipts to prove we just spunked 1/3rd of our salary into the economy rather than saved or invested it.



skip_1

Original Poster:

3,514 posts

219 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Ordinary Bloke said:
Yeah, that makes lots of sense, £20 each...

Edited by Ordinary Bloke on Thursday 5th February 23:04
Maybe it should say £950billion or hundred billion instead? redface

skip_1

Original Poster:

3,514 posts

219 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
Hedders said:
Another way to do it.

They could just get rid of the income tax office and make us produce receipts to prove we just spunked 1/3rd of our salary into the economy rather than saved or invested it.
It'd be like getting £20k tax rebates biggrin

Ordinary Bloke

4,559 posts

227 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
skip_1 said:
Ordinary Bloke said:
Yeah, that makes lots of sense, £21.11 each...

Edited by Ordinary Bloke on Thursday 5th February 23:04
Maybe it should say £950billion or hundred billion instead? redface
Maybe I just deleted my post! biggrin

It's what the US government did last year, and it didn't seem to work, but if they want to give me 21 grand I promise to spend it (on a 911)...

jeff m

4,066 posts

287 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
An incentive to buy a British car is a sound idea.
An incentive to buy anything British is good too.

However handing out money to individuals is a one off event and no doubt a lot would be spent on Chinese and Korean goods. It would just be a short term blip.

Unpopular, I know, but incentives to business to employ people or even, just not dump them onto the State has a more lasting effect.

skip_1

Original Poster:

3,514 posts

219 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
jeff m said:
An incentive to buy a British car is a sound idea.
An incentive to buy anything British is good too.

However handing out money to individuals is a one off event and no doubt a lot would be spent on Chinese and Korean goods. It would just be a short term blip.

Unpopular, I know, but incentives to business to employ people or even, just not dump them onto the State has a more lasting effect.
But isn't the idea that we should buy our way out of the recession, no matter the origin of the goods as long as they're bought from a UK retailer?

Emsman

7,307 posts

219 months

Thursday 5th February 2009
quotequote all
I think this thread is very, very silly.

Everyone should take a leaf out of the older generations behaviour- save for things, dont run up huge credit card bills.

People moan about the state of the economy, they should be saving for a rainy day, like my parents have done. They have saved for 35 years, and are now in the fortunate position of having................................




















fk all.

Hang on, that cant be right, can it??

jeff m

4,066 posts

287 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
skip_1 said:
jeff m said:
An incentive to buy a British car is a sound idea.
An incentive to buy anything British is good too.

However handing out money to individuals is a one off event and no doubt a lot would be spent on Chinese and Korean goods. It would just be a short term blip.

Unpopular, I know, but incentives to business to employ people or even, just not dump them onto the State has a more lasting effect.
But isn't the idea that we should buy our way out of the recession, no matter the origin of the goods as long as they're bought from a UK retailer?
Balance of payments will suffer.
I'm a bit of a capitalist so my veiws are often off the wall to many biggrin
If you give Tarquin a few quid he will buy a Hoodie made in Korea. The fact that it is sold by an Indian in UK helps but it doesn't do much for the "man in the Street" who wants to keep his job.
Give a businessman a tax credit if he takes on new employees has a lasting effect.
The problem is that at present the Govenment is only concerned about its own bottom line, hence looking for new avenues of income , business, payroll taxes, motorists almost anyone it can wring a few more pennies from.
At the same time it continues to maintain a massive public sector along with the ever increasing pension liablity.

I take the veiw that only taxation from the private sector is actually real tax money.
Example..A policeman paid from UK taxes pays tax but if they just paid him a net equivalent it would be the same net cost. So in reality a State employees tax is a wash.

The govenment will have to at some stage have to loosen its grip on business either on regulatory basis or taxation. If it continues to only consider itself more business will shrink and more will lose their jobs.

I doubt we can actually reach the New Labia objective of all being employed by the state but that seems to be the direction at present.
We'ed need pretty good invisable earnings for thatbiggrin

I may try this again with less alcohol.beer

AJS-

15,366 posts

265 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
Giving everyone money is not really any stupider than just giving it to the banks. The trouble is it still wouldn't actually create anything new. Simplify it down to 10 people on a boat trading their rations using tokens. If you give everyone an extra 10 tokens it doesn't give them any more rations.

The problem with the economy at the moment in my view is not that no one is spending or lending money, it's that no one is actually creating wealth, and lots of people are consuming it.

Ordinary Bloke

4,559 posts

227 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
AJS- said:
...
So you avoided a ban? wink

AJS-

15,366 posts

265 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
A ban for what??

Ordinary Bloke

4,559 posts

227 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
Chickens, Foxes, Catz, Rabbits, all that stuff... Oh forget it wink

AJS-

15,366 posts

265 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
Oh that! Well not yet anyway. If there's one thing I do know it's how to take a joke too far, so give it time.

Number 5

2,761 posts

224 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
How about the people in debt registering with the governent for individual bail outs? For example those people that are up to their necks in debt can have their debts cleared by the governent but they will be restricted from this type of borrowing again for five years. That would surely kick start the economy if people had more cash to spend.

That would suit me fine even though I'm not in debt I would prefer to see the tax payers bailed out rather than the banks etc...

MitchT

17,114 posts

238 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
£20k. Yes please! Ferrari 328 coming my way!! biggrin

Hedders

24,460 posts

276 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
Number 5 said:
How about the people in debt registering with the governent for individual bail outs? For example those people that are up to their necks in debt can have their debts cleared by the governent but they will be restricted from this type of borrowing again for five years. That would surely kick start the economy if people had more cash to spend.

That would suit me fine even though I'm not in debt I would prefer to see the tax payers bailed out rather than the banks etc...
You could not restrict it to once every five years because people would abuse that (every five years)!


Skipppy

1,136 posts

239 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
If they want to give me 20 grand, fine. I'd bugger off to Thailand for a couple of years and wait for this to blow over!

Guybrush

4,364 posts

235 months

Friday 6th February 2009
quotequote all
Cut foreign aid and reduce the size of the public sector (currently an expensive way to pay unemployment benefit and hide true unemployment) and get Labour out. That would be a good start.