Tell me about this, would you say it was real?
Tell me about this, would you say it was real?
Author
Discussion

AB

Original Poster:

19,386 posts

216 months

Sunday 8th February 2009
quotequote all



If replica, then I think a good one? What do you guys think?

Seb d

615 posts

218 months

Sunday 8th February 2009
quotequote all
On cheap fakes, the chrono hand acts as the second hand and seeing as this one is moving but the chronograph pushers are screwed in, I'm going to say fake. Thing is, while even a cheap fake can look ok in a photo, it's the details in the metal that make all the difference.

andy tims

5,598 posts

267 months

Sunday 8th February 2009
quotequote all
Looks fake to me.

TheEnd

15,370 posts

209 months

Sunday 8th February 2009
quotequote all
It's a copy, the 6 and 9 dials are in the wrong place.




toohuge

3,469 posts

237 months

Sunday 8th February 2009
quotequote all
Well spotted that man!^^

Don1

16,341 posts

229 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
Immediate reaction is 'fake'....

cyberface

12,214 posts

278 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
Rolex made loads of different variations of the Daytona, making it easy for the fakers to pass off 'special editions' etc.

However the spot above is correct. Zenith-movement Daytonas had seconds at 9 but had narrower spacing of the subdials than the Valjoux 7750 (which is what all the replicas use). The Rolex-movement Daytonas moved the subsidiary seconds to 6, which meant the fakers had to add another bridge to shift the 7750 seconds round to 6-o-clock, which makes the watch noticeably thicker.

More notably, the VJ7750 has the chrono subdials in the same diametric plane as the centre hands. The Rolex-movement Daytona does not - the axes of the minute and hour totalisers are placed a millimetre or so above the diametric centre line of the watch. The fake shown above has the subdials in the same centre line, so it's a well-finished VJ7750 fake.

Of course both photos above could be fakes but I've just checked photos of my old watch (which I know to be genuine) and it also has the subdials slightly above the centre line. And the VJ7750-based Sinn I have has the subdials in a straight line, so I call 'fake' too.

It'd fool all but the watch geeks, mind you. wink

Civpilot

6,246 posts

261 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
cyberface said:
Rolex made loads of different variations of the Daytona, making it easy for the fakers to pass off 'special editions' etc.

However the spot above is correct. Zenith-movement Daytonas had seconds at 9 but had narrower spacing of the subdials than the Valjoux 7750 (which is what all the replicas use). The Rolex-movement Daytonas moved the subsidiary seconds to 6, which meant the fakers had to add another bridge to shift the 7750 seconds round to 6-o-clock, which makes the watch noticeably thicker.

More notably, the VJ7750 has the chrono subdials in the same diametric plane as the centre hands. The Rolex-movement Daytona does not - the axes of the minute and hour totalisers are placed a millimetre or so above the diametric centre line of the watch. The fake shown above has the subdials in the same centre line, so it's a well-finished VJ7750 fake.

Of course both photos above could be fakes but I've just checked photos of my old watch (which I know to be genuine) and it also has the subdials slightly above the centre line. And the VJ7750-based Sinn I have has the subdials in a straight line, so I call 'fake' too.

It'd fool all but the watch geeks, mind you. wink
I suddenly have the urge to claim I thought it was real wink


... but I don't think I would be beleived.

Eggle

3,609 posts

257 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
cyberface said:
Rolex made loads of different variations of the Daytona, making it easy for the fakers to pass off 'special editions' etc.

However the spot above is correct. Zenith-movement Daytonas had seconds at 9 but had narrower spacing of the subdials than the Valjoux 7750 (which is what all the replicas use). The Rolex-movement Daytonas moved the subsidiary seconds to 6, which meant the fakers had to add another bridge to shift the 7750 seconds round to 6-o-clock, which makes the watch noticeably thicker.

More notably, the VJ7750 has the chrono subdials in the same diametric plane as the centre hands. The Rolex-movement Daytona does not - the axes of the minute and hour totalisers are placed a millimetre or so above the diametric centre line of the watch. The fake shown above has the subdials in the same centre line, so it's a well-finished VJ7750 fake.

Of course both photos above could be fakes but I've just checked photos of my old watch (which I know to be genuine) and it also has the subdials slightly above the centre line. And the VJ7750-based Sinn I have has the subdials in a straight line, so I call 'fake' too.

It'd fool all but the watch geeks, mind you. wink
How on earth do you know so much

Strangely Brown

13,304 posts

252 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
Quinny said:
I have a theory on thisyes

The brain is like a vessel. It has a certain capacity to hold stuff, and when its full, somthing has to be removed so that something else can fit in.
That's true. I went to a wine tasting once and had a great time "learning" about the different wines. I learned so much that I forgot how to drive.

Unapologetically stolen from Homer Simpson

toohuge

3,469 posts

237 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
Strangely Brown said:
Quinny said:
I have a theory on thisyes

The brain is like a vessel. It has a certain capacity to hold stuff, and when its full, somthing has to be removed so that something else can fit in.
That's true. I went to a wine tasting once and had a great time "learning" about the different wines. I learned so much that I forgot how to drive.

Unapologetically stolen from Homer Simpson
No way, that happened to me, i went to a wine tasting and i 'learnt' so much i forgot how to talk or even walk! hehe

DjSki

1,326 posts

216 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
Look at the awful lettering...you don't need to look further....poor fake.

cyberface

12,214 posts

278 months

Monday 9th February 2009
quotequote all
Quinny said:
I have a theory on thisyes

The brain is like a vessel. It has a certain capacity to hold stuff, and when its full, somthing has to be removed so that something else can fit in.

Cyberface, knows loads of facts about watches. Bu he's forgotten how to tie his shoelaceshehehehe
/pats my nice comfy slippers

hehe