Thick as f*** debt Collecting Agencies!!
Thick as f*** debt Collecting Agencies!!
Author
Discussion

Iain H

Original Poster:

390 posts

222 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
In the last week I have had delivered to my house 2 letters for a bloke who has never lived there. The first one looked a bit dodgy as I could see through the window in the envelope that it mentioned legal proceedings, so I opened it.

It was from a debt collection agency on behalf of United Utilities chasing a degt of £17.30. I rang them and told them the bloke doesn't, and never has lived at our address. They agreed to remove the address from their records. Then yesterday I get another letter for the mystery bloke, stating that if the bill isn't paid in 7 days we will be receiving a visit from a "field Representative" (read thick as fk gorilla type). So I rang them again and bked them for being so thick s to not get the right address. And have bked them by fax so hopefully they will now have the message.

How can they send letter threatening people with visits to chase up debt when they are too fking stupid to even get the right address. Even United Utilities have no record of the debt! My wife is 6 months pregnant and would have been rather worried and upset if the mentioned representative turned up at our door!! They make my piss boil, utter fking retarded s the lot of them.

And breath, I think I need to go for a lunch time pint to calm down! drink

Puggit

49,788 posts

277 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
They'll still turn up...

Rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
First letter will not have necessarily have been their fault, the second was probably in the mailing pile before you even called them about the first.

If they get in touch again about the same issue in the next week or so, then you may go postal at will.

2/10 good sentiment, but flawed argument.


Edited by Rude-boy on Tuesday 10th February 13:06

Zod

35,295 posts

287 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
I wrote this letter in similar circumstances last year. It worked.


my letter said:
fkwit Receivable Services plc

FAO: [CEO]

By fax: -





[supposed creditor] – Your letter of [date], Reference [fkwit 1]


Dear Sir,

You have written twice to x, at my address. He does not live at my address.

I have no time to waste in providing you with evidence, so I suggest you get up to date instructions from your client.

Do not write to me or to x at the above address again, unless to confirm there is no debt or apologise. Any further demand letters may be considered to be harassment and may be reported to the police with a view to your criminal prosecution under s1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1998, s85 of the Postal Services Act 2000, s127 of the Communications Act 2003, and/or s2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 - this last with a view to the court issuing a Restraining Order against you. Additionally, civil action may be taken against you personally and your employer to cease and desist and for the recovery of all costs, together with a substantial payment in compensation for the mental pain and suffering caused.

Any action commenced by you will be defended and, given there is no debt, you will lose. You may also be pursued for defamation.

I expect that you will understand the seriousness of this matter and will instruct your employees accordingly without delay.

Yours faithfully,


[Me]

mrmaggit

10,146 posts

277 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
Iain H said:
In the last week I have had delivered to my house 2 letters for a bloke who has never lived there. The first one looked a bit dodgy as I could see through the window in the envelope that it mentioned legal proceedings, so I opened it.

It was from a debt collection agency on behalf of United Utilities chasing a degt of £17.30. I rang them and told them the bloke doesn't, and never has lived at our address. They agreed to remove the address from their records. Then yesterday I get another letter for the mystery bloke, stating that if the bill isn't paid in 7 days we will be receiving a visit from a "field Representative" (read thick as fk gorilla type). So I rang them again and bked them for being so thick s to not get the right address. And have bked them by fax so hopefully they will now have the message.

How can they send letter threatening people with visits to chase up debt when they are too fking stupid to even get the right address. Even United Utilities have no record of the debt! My wife is 6 months pregnant and would have been rather worried and upset if the mentioned representative turned up at our door!! They make my piss boil, utter fking retarded s the lot of them.

And breath, I think I need to go for a lunch time pint to calm down! drink
This is exactly why Bailiffs should never, ever be allowed to have access to your home without a warrant and the Police present. Yet the Gummint want to allow them. F*ckwits the lot of them.

Iain H

Original Poster:

390 posts

222 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
Zod said:
I wrote this letter in similar circumstances last year. It worked.


my letter said:
fkwit Receivable Services plc

FAO: [CEO]

By fax: -





[supposed creditor] – Your letter of [date], Reference [fkwit 1]


Dear Sir,

You have written twice to x, at my address. He does not live at my address.

I have no time to waste in providing you with evidence, so I suggest you get up to date instructions from your client.

Do not write to me or to x at the above address again, unless to confirm there is no debt or apologise. Any further demand letters may be considered to be harassment and may be reported to the police with a view to your criminal prosecution under s1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1998, s85 of the Postal Services Act 2000, s127 of the Communications Act 2003, and/or s2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 - this last with a view to the court issuing a Restraining Order against you. Additionally, civil action may be taken against you personally and your employer to cease and desist and for the recovery of all costs, together with a substantial payment in compensation for the mental pain and suffering caused.

Any action commenced by you will be defended and, given there is no debt, you will lose. You may also be pursued for defamation.

I expect that you will understand the seriousness of this matter and will instruct your employees accordingly without delay.

Yours faithfully,


[Me]
I will use that if they are daft enough to contact me again!

Rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
Zod said:
I wrote this letter in similar circumstances last year. It worked.


my letter said:
fkwit Receivable Services plc

FAO: [CEO]

By fax: -





[supposed creditor] – Your letter of [date], Reference [fkwit 1]


Dear Sir,

You have written twice to x, at my address. He does not live at my address.

I have no time to waste in providing you with evidence, so I suggest you get up to date instructions from your client.

Do not write to me or to x at the above address again, unless to confirm there is no debt or apologise. Any further demand letters may be considered to be harassment and may be reported to the police with a view to your criminal prosecution under s1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1998, s85 of the Postal Services Act 2000, s127 of the Communications Act 2003, and/or s2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 - this last with a view to the court issuing a Restraining Order against you. Additionally, civil action may be taken against you personally and your employer to cease and desist and for the recovery of all costs, together with a substantial payment in compensation for the mental pain and suffering caused.

Any action commenced by you will be defended and, given there is no debt, you will lose. You may also be pursued for defamation.

I expect that you will understand the seriousness of this matter and will instruct your employees accordingly without delay.

Yours faithfully,


[Me]
Aww play fair.

It's no fun to trot out the legal bits until they have ignored the common sense approach.

Then it's time to explain that you are not exactly green when it comes to the law.

How long did it take your trainee to research and draft that hehe

Edited by Rude-boy on Tuesday 10th February 13:11

ShadownINja

79,988 posts

311 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
Zod said:
I wrote this letter in similar circumstances last year. It worked.


my letter said:
fkwit Receivable Services plc

FAO: [CEO]

By fax: -





[supposed creditor] – Your letter of [date], Reference [fkwit 1]


Dear Sir,

You have written twice to x, at my address. He does not live at my address.

I have no time to waste in providing you with evidence, so I suggest you get up to date instructions from your client.

Do not write to me or to x at the above address again, unless to confirm there is no debt or apologise. Any further demand letters may be considered to be harassment and may be reported to the police with a view to your criminal prosecution under s1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1998, s85 of the Postal Services Act 2000, s127 of the Communications Act 2003, and/or s2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 - this last with a view to the court issuing a Restraining Order against you. Additionally, civil action may be taken against you personally and your employer to cease and desist and for the recovery of all costs, together with a substantial payment in compensation for the mental pain and suffering caused.

Any action commenced by you will be defended and, given there is no debt, you will lose. You may also be pursued for defamation.

I expect that you will understand the seriousness of this matter and will instruct your employees accordingly without delay.

Yours faithfully,


[Me]
Can I take out a loan for £25k under the name of Fred Bloggs and then send this letter? Just wondering. biggrin

trooperiziz

9,457 posts

281 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
ShadownINja said:
Can I take out a loan for £25k under the name of Fred Bloggs and then send this letter? Just wondering. biggrin
Better idea would be to take it out in the name Iain H and tell them you live at his house, surely wink

ShadownINja

79,988 posts

311 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
trooperiziz said:
ShadownINja said:
Can I take out a loan for £25k under the name of Fred Bloggs and then send this letter? Just wondering. biggrin
Better idea would be to take it out in the name Iain H and tell them you live at his house, surely wink
hehe I like your thinking.

Iain H

Original Poster:

390 posts

222 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
trooperiziz said:
ShadownINja said:
Can I take out a loan for £25k under the name of Fred Bloggs and then send this letter? Just wondering. biggrin
Better idea would be to take it out in the name Iain H and tell them you live at his house, surely wink
Easy tiger!!, unless you share some of it with me, and I can deny all knowledge of it!! I feel a plan formulating!!

davido140

9,614 posts

255 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
ShadownINja said:
Zod said:
I wrote this letter in similar circumstances last year. It worked.


my letter said:
fkwit Receivable Services plc

FAO: [CEO]

By fax: -





[supposed creditor] – Your letter of [date], Reference [fkwit 1]


Dear Sir,

You have written twice to x, at my address. He does not live at my address.

I have no time to waste in providing you with evidence, so I suggest you get up to date instructions from your client.

Do not write to me or to x at the above address again, unless to confirm there is no debt or apologise. Any further demand letters may be considered to be harassment and may be reported to the police with a view to your criminal prosecution under s1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1998, s85 of the Postal Services Act 2000, s127 of the Communications Act 2003, and/or s2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 - this last with a view to the court issuing a Restraining Order against you. Additionally, civil action may be taken against you personally and your employer to cease and desist and for the recovery of all costs, together with a substantial payment in compensation for the mental pain and suffering caused.

Any action commenced by you will be defended and, given there is no debt, you will lose. You may also be pursued for defamation.

I expect that you will understand the seriousness of this matter and will instruct your employees accordingly without delay.

Yours faithfully,


[Me]
Can I take out a loan for £25k under the name of Fred Bloggs and then send this letter? Just wondering. biggrin
short answer is, yes you can.

Its a bit more complicated but its very possible, there was a thread kicking around the P&P today of someones mother having it done in here name.

MaxAndRuby

6,792 posts

261 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
Iain H said:
bloke who has never lived there. The first one looked a bit dodgy as I could see through the window in the envelope that it mentioned legal proceedings, so I opened it.
Highly illegal. You're in trouble.

Iain H

Original Poster:

390 posts

222 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
MaxAndRuby said:
Iain H said:
bloke who has never lived there. The first one looked a bit dodgy as I could see through the window in the envelope that it mentioned legal proceedings, so I opened it.
Highly illegal. You're in trouble.
I get on average 5 letters a week for people who have never lived there, most get put back in the post, I am glad I opened this one as I was able to sort it out, had it just gone back in the post God knows who would have turned up on my door step. If they want the correct person to open their letter SEND IT TO THE CORRECT fkING ADDRESS!!!

Now about that £25k loan!!

-JUT-

1,991 posts

242 months

Tuesday 10th February 2009
quotequote all
Zod said:
I wrote this letter in similar circumstances last year. It worked.


my letter said:
fkwit Receivable Services plc

FAO: [CEO]

By fax: -





[supposed creditor] – Your letter of [date], Reference [fkwit 1]


Dear Sir,

You have written twice to x, at my address. He does not live at my address.

I have no time to waste in providing you with evidence, so I suggest you get up to date instructions from your client.

Do not write to me or to x at the above address again, unless to confirm there is no debt or apologise. Any further demand letters may be considered to be harassment and may be reported to the police with a view to your criminal prosecution under s1 of the Malicious Communications Act 1998, s85 of the Postal Services Act 2000, s127 of the Communications Act 2003, and/or s2 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 - this last with a view to the court issuing a Restraining Order against you. Additionally, civil action may be taken against you personally and your employer to cease and desist and for the recovery of all costs, together with a substantial payment in compensation for the mental pain and suffering caused.

Any action commenced by you will be defended and, given there is no debt, you will lose. You may also be pursued for defamation.

I expect that you will understand the seriousness of this matter and will instruct your employees accordingly without delay.

Yours faithfully,


[Me]
Me likey... but you know that unless it's a small-time company, your letter will probably never reach the head honcho...

If you want to push it a step further... is the debt recovery agency a limited company? If so, you can go on the companies house website and order documents on the company, namely the Current Appointments report for a whopping £1, which will list who the Director(s) of the company is/are, and where they live... you can then send said snotty letter to the Director(s) home address(es) threatening them with legal action, and see how they like it... evil

Edited by -JUT- on Tuesday 10th February 13:34