Have I got lucky?
Author
Discussion

selmahoos

Original Poster:

694 posts

238 months

Wednesday 11th February 2009
quotequote all
I direct a taxi company and own a number of taxis (private hire). Today the financial dept of a dumb fkwit firm who sold me 5 cars in June 2007 rang to say they hadn't received any payments for one of them. After 2.5 hours of checking through bank statements I found they're right, and despite them supposedly setting up the financing and arranging the direct debit for this car, no d/d has ever been effected, and not a penny has been paid.

Bearing in mind that like most motor dealers they are lower than a snake's belly and that therefore there is no moral issue involved, does anyone know what the legal position is? Best advice please?

Plotloss

67,280 posts

299 months

Wednesday 11th February 2009
quotequote all
You've recieved benefit from the vehicles therefore you are liable to pay what is owed.

In simple terms.

Not that I expect you'll get a massive amount of help from the PH legal types mind laugh

jimbo65

752 posts

227 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
You owe them money, you shold check your bank statements more closely.

Nolar Dog

8,786 posts

224 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
Have you been using the cars?

Of course you have.
So pay for them then.

playerone

872 posts

239 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
You are digging yourself a huge hole in these forums. If you were trying to be anonymous then you could possibly get away with it.

Putting your domain name and business interests on a forum that ranks highly in Google is stunning naive.

bigandclever

14,334 posts

267 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
Come on, you're seemingly a bright chap. You work it out.

selmahoos

Original Poster:

694 posts

238 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
We-ell, today's briefest of conversations seemed to indicate they accepted negligence on their part and that giving the keys back would be considered an acceptable solution by them......

port and polish

290 posts

212 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
selmahoos said:
We-ell, today's briefest of conversations seemed to indicate they accepted negligence on their part and that giving the keys back would be considered an acceptable solution by them......
Can you pay what is owed afterall it has made you cash in the last few months?

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

284 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
selmahoos said:
Bearing in mind that like most motor dealers they are lower than a snake's belly and that therefore there is no moral issue involved
Yes there is..your company has a contract.

selmahoos said:
does anyone know what the legal position is? Best advice please?
As a director, it is your responsibility to keep financial records, which includes the recording of assets and liabilities. You have not done this. You have broken the law.

HTH...

AJS-

15,366 posts

265 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
If you can give them the keys back I reckon you're onto a winner. How many miles have you put on them since 2007? 50K plus I'd think, and 18 months free car hire.

-Lummox-

1,983 posts

242 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
AJS- said:
If you can give them the keys back I reckon you're onto a winner. How many miles have you put on them since 2007? 50K plus I'd think, and 18 months free car hire.
I'd want something in writing confirming that they aren't going to try to recover any money from you in addition to the return of the vehicles, personally. Otherwise it could all get very messy another year or two down the line when they change their minds. Statutory time bar on the debt is a long way off yet...

Even if you return the cars and they "say" that's that now, legally you have gained an incontrovertible benefit that you haven't paid for and if they claimed against you at a later date, how would you PROVE that they said they'd let you off the debt? They are not required by law to let you off and if it comes to your word against theirs, you'd stand a good chance of losing when you've had a couple of years use of the cars for free.

Nolar Dog

8,786 posts

224 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
selmahoos said:
We-ell, today's briefest of conversations seemed to indicate they accepted negligence on their part and that giving the keys back would be considered an acceptable solution by them......
Do that then. See if you can "get lucky" again with the replacement. rolleyes

Nolar Dog

8,786 posts

224 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
selmahoos said:
We-ell, today's briefest of conversations seemed to indicate they accepted negligence on their part and that giving the keys back would be considered an acceptable solution by them......
Do that then. See if you can "get lucky" again with the replacement. rolleyes

selmahoos

Original Poster:

694 posts

238 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
It could be a bit more complicated than it seems. From memory, £500 deposit was paid with the balance to be paid via financing arranged by this dealer. They don't supply the finance but outsource it, like they all do. If I hadn't been paying it, the FINANCE company would be chasing the debt, wouldn't they? So what I THINK has probably happened here is that they've never passed the paperwork to the finance company. If they had, then wouldn't the finance company have paid THEM in full? Trouble is, I don't think that with the passage of time the finance company will now accept the business. And I have a deal to pay over a set period by set instalments. So I just wonder how far a quite different deal can be enforced by the dealer (whose negligence, and not mine, has really caused the problem in the first place). I've got a funny feeling that their position isn't very strong.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

284 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
It would be a strange dealer that left a sold car in his system as unpaid for two years. And a strange auditor to miss it.

port and polish

290 posts

212 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
selmahoos said:
It could be a bit more complicated than it seems. From memory, £500 deposit was paid with the balance to be paid via financing arranged by this dealer. They don't supply the finance but outsource it, like they all do. If I hadn't been paying it, the FINANCE company would be chasing the debt, wouldn't they? So what I THINK has probably happened here is that they've never passed the paperwork to the finance company. If they had, then wouldn't the finance company have paid THEM in full? Trouble is, I don't think that with the passage of time the finance company will now accept the business. And I have a deal to pay over a set period by set instalments. So I just wonder how far a quite different deal can be enforced by the dealer (whose negligence, and not mine, has really caused the problem in the first place). I've got a funny feeling that their position isn't very strong.
Mate I would if I were you stop posting about this on here. I for one know of a few guys who work for various companies such as Clydsdale, Black Horse, GE Money etc who browse on here.

Sounds like the dealer has handed the vehicle to you without sending the finance docs off just as you said. I would remind you though you still may have to pay for the vehicle as you could be in breach of your sales contract. I wouldn't know without seeing your docs but I would go and have a chat with your solicitor/Accountant in the morning and see what the score is.

GreenV8S

31,010 posts

313 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
selmahoos said:
therefore there is no moral issue involved
You see nothing wrong about taking goods without paying for them and you're calling them lower than a snake's belly? There's something seriously wrong with your personal ethics if you think there's no moral issue.

selmahoos

Original Poster:

694 posts

238 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
GreenV8S said:
selmahoos said:
therefore there is no moral issue involved
You see nothing wrong about taking goods without paying for them and you're calling them lower than a snake's belly? There's something seriously wrong with your personal ethics if you think there's no moral issue.
Erm, I bought 5 cars from these shysters. I paid a £500 deposit on each of them. I then signed their financing paperwork for a deal to stage payment the balances over 4 years. Apparently their negligence has resulted in one of these agreements never being put in place. What part of this scenario involves "taking goods without paying for them"?


mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

284 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
selmahoos said:
GreenV8S said:
selmahoos said:
therefore there is no moral issue involved
You see nothing wrong about taking goods without paying for them and you're calling them lower than a snake's belly? There's something seriously wrong with your personal ethics if you think there's no moral issue.
Erm, I bought 5 cars from these shysters. I paid a £500 deposit on each of them. I then signed their financing paperwork for a deal to stage payment the balances over 4 years. Apparently their negligence has resulted in one of these agreements never being put in place. What part of this scenario involves "taking goods without paying for them"?
The part where you took goods without paying for them...

selmahoos

Original Poster:

694 posts

238 months

Thursday 12th February 2009
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
selmahoos said:
GreenV8S said:
selmahoos said:
therefore there is no moral issue involved
You see nothing wrong about taking goods without paying for them and you're calling them lower than a snake's belly? There's something seriously wrong with your personal ethics if you think there's no moral issue.
Erm, I bought 5 cars from these shysters. I paid a £500 deposit on each of them. I then signed their financing paperwork for a deal to stage payment the balances over 4 years. Apparently their negligence has resulted in one of these agreements never being put in place. What part of this scenario involves "taking goods without paying for them"?
The part where you took goods without paying for them...
.....apart from the deposit and the finance agreement for the balance that they appear to have handled negligently....