What does 'Sexual assault' mean?
Discussion
Following on from the cab driver drugging case
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7943339....
I wonder what the term sexual assault actually means. Wikipedia not much help
I would presume that it means some kind of sexual activity that stops short of rape, otherwise they would call it rape?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7943339....
I wonder what the term sexual assault actually means. Wikipedia not much help
I would presume that it means some kind of sexual activity that stops short of rape, otherwise they would call it rape?
In law, "assault" has plenty of meaning.
It implies force, unwillingness of the victim, coercion, taking advantage of etc etc etc.
Obviously, in any court case, the prosecution has to show that these elements existed in the case being tried.
If an individual doesn't understand what the word "assault" actually menas, they could find themselves in big trouble.
It implies force, unwillingness of the victim, coercion, taking advantage of etc etc etc.
Obviously, in any court case, the prosecution has to show that these elements existed in the case being tried.
If an individual doesn't understand what the word "assault" actually menas, they could find themselves in big trouble.
singlecoil said:
Following on from the cab driver drugging case
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7943339....
I wonder what the term sexual assault actually means. Wikipedia not much help
I would presume that it means some kind of sexual activity that stops short of rape, otherwise they would call it rape?
You could always try and hit whichever strumpet you have http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7943339....
I wonder what the term sexual assault actually means. Wikipedia not much help
I would presume that it means some kind of sexual activity that stops short of rape, otherwise they would call it rape?
Then wait and see what you get charged with. Should give you some indication?
HTH
If you want the legal definition- the Crown must prove to the requisite standard (so the jury are sure)-
1. That the defendant touched the victim
2. That the touching was sexual in nature
3. That the victim did not consent to the touching
4. That the defendant did not reasonably believe that the victim consented to the touching.
You can't commit a sexual assault without touching. Common law rules of assault do not apply to the Sexual Offences Act.
1. That the defendant touched the victim
2. That the touching was sexual in nature
3. That the victim did not consent to the touching
4. That the defendant did not reasonably believe that the victim consented to the touching.
You can't commit a sexual assault without touching. Common law rules of assault do not apply to the Sexual Offences Act.
Edited by hunt_the_fox on Saturday 14th March 12:28
Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff