Serious question about infinity

Serious question about infinity

Author
Discussion

Bushmaster

Original Poster:

27,451 posts

293 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
Right, the coastline - any given coastline. It's all inlets and jaggedy outcrops and beaches, right?

So I measure it to see how long it is. Point A to point B. Right, that's about a mile in a straight line. But the coastline is not straight. So I measure it again, taking account of all the ins and outs. Three miles. OK, but now I look closely at the coast and see that each in and each out is made up of smallers ins and outs. I measure them. 12 miles. I get a magnifying glass and examine each mini in and each mini out. Guess what, they've got their own ins and outs. 68 miles. And so on, right down to microscopic level. Thousands of miles. And even smaller. Millions of miles and so on to a fractal-shaped infinity. So, the coastline from A to B is infinity long.

Yet I can jog it - an infinite distance - in 9 minutes. WTF is that all about?


camgear

6,941 posts

208 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
I wouldn't be infinity though would it, it'd just be a really really big number...

Somewhatfoolish

4,830 posts

200 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
1) Don't read Mandelbrot when stoned.
2) It's a model anyway. After all the coastline is discrete due to atoms and such
3) When you jog it you are jogging a smoothed coastline which has finite length

KANEIT

2,836 posts

233 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
But you've not followed that precise path, you've skipped bits.
Either that or it's worm holes.

Rob.

17,911 posts

232 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
Re: Cam gear

But if this calculation was expanded around, say, the whole of the British Isles, then would we not reach infinity instead of just a big number?

Edited by Rob. on Friday 20th March 18:04

V8mate

45,899 posts

203 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
A mile-long beach is a mile long.

HTH

Bushmaster

Original Poster:

27,451 posts

293 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
KANEIT said:
But you've not followed that precise path, you've skipped bits.
Either that or it's worm holes.
So I have jumped over an infinite distance? That's pretty cool.

mechsympathy

55,657 posts

269 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
Bushmaster said:
Yet I can jog it - an infinite distance - in 9 minutes. WTF is that all about?

YOu're slightly bigger than the average sub-atomic particleyes

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

212 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
Bushmaster said:


Yet I can jog it - an infinite distance - in 9 minutes. WTF is that all about?

i know! 9mins.. pull your finger out man, i can walk it faster!

Merc fan

963 posts

197 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
It's not an infinitessimal distance but it could take you an infinitessimal time to measure it as you can always go slower without stopping.

KANEIT

2,836 posts

233 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
Bushmaster said:
KANEIT said:
But you've not followed that precise path, you've skipped bits.
Either that or it's worm holes.
So I have jumped over an infinite distance? That's pretty cool.
You've skipped over an amount of matter that if broken up and aligned particle by particle end on end would be of an infinite length - but it's not arranged as such!

Heroes is fiction BTW OR you better keep moving they're after you!

DrTre

12,955 posts

246 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
it's not infinite, you're just measuring the same distance with ever increasing precision.

sstein

6,249 posts

268 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
If you have a mile long road to walk. On the first step you move 0.5 miles. The second step you move forward 0.25 miles, then 0.125 miles, 0.0625m etc etc and keep moving half the distance you moved before. You will never reach the end.

That's wierd!

-

Stuart


Martial Arts Man

6,662 posts

200 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
Rob. said:
Re: Cam gear

But if this calculation was expanded around, say, the whole of the British Isles, then would we not reach infinity instead of just a big number?

Edited by Rob. on Friday 20th March 18:04
Just a bigger number I'm afraid.

fido

17,729 posts

269 months

Bushmaster

Original Poster:

27,451 posts

293 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
DrTre said:
it's not infinite, you're just measuring the same distance with ever increasing precision.
No the distance gets much longer as you measure more of the detail.

DrTre

12,955 posts

246 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
Bushmaster said:
DrTre said:
it's not infinite, you're just measuring the same distance with ever increasing precision.
No the distance gets much longer as you measure more of the detail.
Yeah, sorry that was crap wording.
Ever increasing spatial precision/resolution is more what I meant and even that's wrong.
Am off out now, I'm sure I'll be much better placed to explain myself after a few drinks...ha!

Snoggledog

8,615 posts

231 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
You'll get to a point when you won't be able to measure anymore because you can't measure each quark. (Actually, you'd die of old age before you've managed 50m metres worth.)If you manage to add it all up it'll be a huge number but won't be infinity.

Balmoral Green

42,313 posts

262 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
Just jog along the top of the junction, instead of going all the way down the cul-de-sac and then coming back up on the other side.

Silent1

19,761 posts

249 months

Friday 20th March 2009
quotequote all
If you coil a million miles of rope into a mile long oval and then run from one end to the other you've not run a million miles have you.