Diffusers Legal
Discussion
Well done to the scrutineers, but don't get happy just yet...

said:
It is expected that the teams will appeal against the stewards' decision, which will force the matter to go to a hearing of the FIA's International Court of Appeal.
Such a meeting cannot take place until after the Malaysian Grand Prix, meaning that Brawn GP, Williams and Toyota will unofficially be racing under appeal at this weekend's race in Australia and would likely be subject to another appeal in Sepang.
Such a meeting cannot take place until after the Malaysian Grand Prix, meaning that Brawn GP, Williams and Toyota will unofficially be racing under appeal at this weekend's race in Australia and would likely be subject to another appeal in Sepang.

Now the protesting teams have... (checks the clock)... 40 minutes to inform the FIA of their intention to appeal.
I can't see any particular reason why the ICA will rule against The Three. The FIA tech group have said OK, Charlie Whiting said OK, scrutineers have said OK - twice. So that's four times that the designs have been OK'ed.
I can't see any particular reason why the ICA will rule against The Three. The FIA tech group have said OK, Charlie Whiting said OK, scrutineers have said OK - twice. So that's four times that the designs have been OK'ed.
Asterix said:
burnt said:
stephen300o said:
Brilliant news, Brawn, Williams and Toyota now have a chance to get in the championship.
Well for one race anyway. All teams will have this design come SepangNot sure everyone will catch up till europe with all the back to back flyaways.
burnt said:
stephen300o said:
Brilliant news, Brawn, Williams and Toyota now have a chance to get in the championship.
Well for one race anyway. All teams will have this design come SepangI can't believe that the other teams haven't already started work on the newly (re)approved design just in case it passed scrutineering, but they are a long way behind.
On the one hand they have had a good look at how the Brawn car works.
On the other, their cars aren't optimised for similar design strategies and they have limited testing.
I don't think just throwing on a new rear crash structure will find 0.5s and give a nicely balanced car, but they should be closer.
stephen300o said:
Asterix said:
burnt said:
stephen300o said:
Brilliant news, Brawn, Williams and Toyota now have a chance to get in the championship.
Well for one race anyway. All teams will have this design come SepangNot sure everyone will catch up till europe with all the back to back flyaways.
Asterix said:
stephen300o said:
Asterix said:
burnt said:
stephen300o said:
Brilliant news, Brawn, Williams and Toyota now have a chance to get in the championship.
Well for one race anyway. All teams will have this design come SepangNot sure everyone will catch up till europe with all the back to back flyaways.
It's not really the angles. It's the location of the gearbox. In the RB5, the gearbox is some 15cm lower than the other teams' thanks to the pull-rod system.
But no, that doesn't really make the double-decker diffuser impossible. It just makes for a heck of a lot of work, because RB5's rear crash structure was designed for a diffuser of uniform height. They can remake it to accommodate a double-decker diffuser with its high centre section, but it means a lot of work and the need to pass another crash test due to redesign.
But no, that doesn't really make the double-decker diffuser impossible. It just makes for a heck of a lot of work, because RB5's rear crash structure was designed for a diffuser of uniform height. They can remake it to accommodate a double-decker diffuser with its high centre section, but it means a lot of work and the need to pass another crash test due to redesign.
Asterix said:
stephen300o said:
Asterix said:
burnt said:
stephen300o said:
Brilliant news, Brawn, Williams and Toyota now have a chance to get in the championship.
Well for one race anyway. All teams will have this design come SepangNot sure everyone will catch up till europe with all the back to back flyaways.
The gearbox casing will be designed specifically for the suspension mounts and clearances for coilovers and roll bars, plus rear bodywork is now too tight, so they have a big job ahead to redevelop compared to everyone else who are doubtless cranking up the second windtunnel as I type, if they haven't already.
Pullrods are unfashionable but the only major disadvantage I can think of is lack of access for adjustment or replacement. Which is less and less important these days as aero is king, and mechanical grip somewhat more incidental.
Newey likely thought the lack of access to adjust was worth the very neat rear end aero and lower centre of gravity, and now he's well and truly on the back foot.
I bet he's also very very annoyed at missing the same interpretation as Brawn, Williams and Toyota cos if he had thought of it and perceived it as a viable and legal solution, there's no way he could have justified pullrods.
Gassing Station | General Motorsport | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



