BBC F1 Commentary......Opinions
BBC F1 Commentary......Opinions
Author
Discussion

JLJ

Original Poster:

402 posts

259 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
I have to say I was disappointed overall. DC was superb, Brundle as brilliant as ever. Humphreys was a let down. As for Eddied Jordan, I thought he was shocking. He was the one I was most looking forward to, he had some useful input, but his presenting style is awful. Early days I know, but I have to say that ITV's commentary was a lot better.

Ian Davidson

4,506 posts

225 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
I've always thought EJ was a cock. He stil is.

Craig@CMR

18,073 posts

235 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
legard was awful, i think they should give the commentary jobs to croft and davidson, there R5 Live commentary is brilliant

Spawn

597 posts

225 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
Other than Brundle I thought the program was quite poor. I got the feeling they were trying to keep everything quite simplistic where as ITV seemed to go into more detail, was that just me? I want to hear good technical info put across in a way we can all understand... But I did think they could have gone into details of the rule changes a little more.

The new commentator is annoying me already.

s3fella

10,524 posts

216 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
edddie jordon needs nuking from orbit, back doors etc etc.

And what plank decided to get that tt Branston on? Asking him about "his" team.

I thought the commentary and whole production was a bit amateurish tbh. No excuse, they have time to practice and seemed as though they were pretty green overall.

stew-S160

8,020 posts

267 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
on the whole, the first BBC coverage for years was miles better than ITV managed the whole time they had it.
No ad breaks
No james allen
more info and explained better
DC is a great pundit and i reckon him and EJ might have a few altercations through the season which will be fun to watch

oobster

7,683 posts

240 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
stew-S160 said:
on the whole, the first BBC coverage for years was miles better than ITV managed the whole time they had it.
No ad breaks
No james allen
more info and explained better
DC is a great pundit and i reckon him and EJ might have a few altercations through the season which will be fun to watch
Spot on. MILES better than ITV.

The only improvement the BBC could make would be to get rid of that annoying git Kravitz. I'd rather have Louise 50-bangles than that tube.

Jamesf288

438 posts

243 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
s3fella said:
they have time to practice.
How do you practice live television?

Teppic

8,079 posts

286 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
Craig@CMR said:
legard was awful, i think they should give the commentary jobs to croft and davidson, there R5 Live commentary is brilliant
Well, Legard hasn't commentated on F1 since 2003, so it may just be that he's a bit out of practice. I thought he was OK, but nothing special. Let's see what he's like after a few races before passing judgement.

baz1985

3,685 posts

274 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
Jamesf288 said:
s3fella said:
they have time to practice.
How do you practice live television?
priceless

gwood

203 posts

242 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
come on lets be honest, we watch all the practices on the interactive tv, its all live with no ads so we dont miss anything, martin brundle is still the best there is. who cares about anything else. and after this morning quail it looks like its gonna be a close season with more overtaking!! could be the best season yet??

fatspud

122 posts

259 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
did humphreys actualy introduce richard branson as branston or was i still waking up i thought EJ and DC were hilarious when EJ said "shumacher was the best driver f1 had ever seen" DC said "no he made sure he had the best cars" quality

wookie

107 posts

311 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
Replace Legard with David Croft. Job done.

AJS-

15,366 posts

265 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
Seem to be in a minority here, but I find DC really irritating and think EJ is quite good.

Agree that Legard seems a bit of a pillock, but I'll reserve my hatred until after the race.

What the hell is all the Bernie worship about though?! Ok, we get it, you're glad to have won the coverage back from ITV but you don't have to kiss his arse at every opportunity.

No ads and a good sound track is a welcome change though!

Rocky Balboa

1,308 posts

229 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
I thought that every aspect of the BBC was better than ITV. It seems that there are some sad bds on here that just have to pick holes and moan about something! Just enjoy the racing FFS! rolleyes

Northern Munkee

5,354 posts

229 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
It's not bad. Legard needs to calm down and seemed to be doing a radio commentary i.e. Too much (we can see!), which meant brundle couldn't get in with some insight, they also talked over each a few times. But as lead commentator it must difficult for legard, as he is actually the junior man, and it might be brumdle showing him the ropes, anyway i remember brundle saying once how different it was working with walker then the cock allen, so some comms, to iron out getting to know each other, and learning when one pauses, you can speak. Leg was obvioisly nervous, first sentence, "formula long..."

Humphreys alright, but lacks gravitas for anchor, although did alright, he's also a normal height, which makes everyone in f1 look like a midget.

DC looks like a good addition, far better than mark 'most definitely steve' blundell, as tv pundit.

Jordan is a cock, and looked like he was about to break into my coocachoo, everytime he raised his microphone towards his mouth.

Thought the opening titles dull, but you can see they've thrown money at the cgi, but it lacked atmos, moodiness or anticipation, rather defeating the purpose of the chain... Could have had any tune.

Other things of note cars still fugly, Branson came over like such a bandwagon jumper, even though he must have been onboard before oz gp, even though he was after max splash, not sure it did virgin a huge favour. Well done Ross brawn.
What's gone wrong at mclaren?

AJS-

15,366 posts

265 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
I think the cars look better than they have done for a while. They're still too skinny, and the front wings look a bit daft, especially the big plain white ones on the BGPs. But proper tyres (YES!) and some nice clean lines have tidied things up a bit.

Also, are the Ferraris a bit darker red this year? They seemed to be less orange than they have been in the last few years.

andygo

7,393 posts

284 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
Yes, what on earth is smiler Branson on about?

'We wanted to step in and save the team', my arse. He saw a good marketing opportunity and prised his cheque book out. Came across as a bit of a plonker really. I'm sure he's not, but why on earth he was interviewed is unusual. Never seen any other sponsors interviewed.

Anyway, as long as he is happy and doesn't get too involved I am pleased for Brawn. Did look funny seeing 2 derivers with no advertising to speak of on their overalls. Looked like a couple of club racers.

JLJ

Original Poster:

402 posts

259 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
Intro is better
The Chain: need I say anything?
Brundle: The man
DC: Better than expected.
EJ: A tit with no instincts for presenting.
Humphreys: I'm sure he knew NOTHING about F1 before getting the job
Legard: Will someone please tell this knob head that he isn't commentating for radio

On the plus side we have The Chain and no breaks, but the presenting was far better on ITV.

Breaks don't bother me so much having Sky+, what's the point of having an extra 30 minutes of coverage with less insight?

All considered, I prefer ITV's coverage. This is very disappointing as I was certain BBC would do a much better job.

I would love to toe Branson in, right in.

andyps

7,819 posts

311 months

Saturday 28th March 2009
quotequote all
andygo said:
Yes, what on earth is smiler Branson on about?

'We wanted to step in and save the team', my arse. He saw a good marketing opportunity and prised his cheque book out. Came across as a bit of a plonker really. I'm sure he's not, but why on earth he was interviewed is unusual. Never seen any other sponsors interviewed.
Not sure about the saving the team comment, but he does say that he would like to do things like that (Concorde?) so there could be some truth in it. As for why was he interviewed when other sponsors aren't - how many of the CEO of other sponsors are household names? Would it make good TV to have António Horta-Osório on the BBC?

I haven't watched it all yet, but once the commentary started I was just realised pleased it wasn't James Allen. I enjoyed the opening sequence, the soundtrack particularly giving me a feel good factor.

EJ has been massively indebted to the little man in the past and has respect for him, he may be alone in that, but it is his view and that is what he is being paid to provide. Plus the little man has agreed to an interview at each race so EJ won't want them to be too difficult.