Cones on the Motorway
Author
Discussion

tonyrec

Original Poster:

3,984 posts

275 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
After just replying to another thread on another Forum it has just given me an idea!

Its amazing how short the general drivers vision actually is.
When we put, say a lane one closure in on a straight bit of the Motorway using cones correctly spaced, you would not (or perhaps you would) believe how many drivers pull up at the end of the cones and then indicate or see them at the last minute and swerve into lane 2.
Quite simply...its frightening

Its nice and reasuring when you see a car approaching and it indicates a couple of hundred metres away and safely pulls into lane 2, but sadly this doesnt happen very often.

When we put the cones out we (should) put them out as per our Fast Road Training indicates.
We use 4 cones per lane and they are set at such a distance that you could drive between the first 2 quite safely at speeds of 90mph.When they are not set out as per the guidelines, you cant drive between the first 2 even at 40mph without attaching them to the front of your car.

Does anyone know what distances we use between the 4 cones to get a nice, safe closure?

Dont get confused with the way that the Contractors close a lane..they use hundreds because their closures last a lot longer than ours and we dont carry that many.

tonyrec

Original Poster:

3,984 posts

275 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
Please dont be shy, hazard a guess...pretty please

streaky

19,311 posts

269 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
tonyrec - I don't know the answer, but back in the '80s I did see a patrol-car on the M6 near Stoke-on-Trent end up wearing a cone on the roof (literally) after hitting some in the o/s lane over a brow. They were contractor's cones protecting barrier repairs, but I saw no warning signs and I was right behind the patrol-car. He hit the cones, two of which flew up into the air both hitting the police car roof, and I followed him into the gap he'd made. He then switched on his roof-lights (which still worked, albeit they were at a drunken angle), slowed to around 40mph, pulled over as much as he could and waved me past (so he protected me - thanks). We then threaded our way through the cones and over to the hard-shoulder. It worked as though there was telepathy between us. It turned out that he had seen no signs either. He wrote a brief note of the incident in his pocket-book and I signed it as a witness. I heard nothing more about it, but I wouldn't have liked to have been the site foreman!

Streaky

>> Edited by streaky on Friday 14th November 14:50

superlightr

12,920 posts

283 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
hmmm nice safe closure of a lane, with 4 cones alowing a car at 90 mph, hmmmmmm

longer then I would imagin. 100m apart?

ashes

628 posts

274 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
Tony - how on earth do you (safely) manage to put out cones while drivers who can't usually see in front of their nose whiz past?

Not a job I'd like to do

Respect

V8 Archie

4,703 posts

268 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
Carefully .

I'm not 100% sure I'm picturing this properly, but I'd have though 30-40 yards would be plenty of room (but probably only if you're expecting to go between them).

BTW Tony, I'm blaming you for my eye hurting! I read a lot of your posts yesterday and the eye that hurts is the one that you wink at the end of most of them .

Edited: to change a stupid guess .

>> Edited by V8 Archie on Friday 14th November 11:36

anonymous-user

74 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
Well, might as well have a guess.

50m apart? Maybe as much as 100m?

tonyrec

Original Poster:

3,984 posts

275 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
ashes said:
Tony - how on earth do you (safely) manage to put out cones while drivers who can't usually see in front of their nose whiz past?

Not a job I'd like to do

Respect


Safest way is by using the Police car to put in a Rolling Road, next best is the prescence of the car as the operator places out the cones.

tonyrec

Original Poster:

3,984 posts

275 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
New Trafpols go on a Fast Road course and its a real eye opener when they are given 4 cones to put out on a simulated lane 1 (normally at an airfield).
They place all cones out over a total distance of around 30m.
They are then told to drive a car at speed towards their cones and drive in between the first two.

This normally ends in-:

1) The car turning over (only joking- never happened yet)
2) They collect all the cones on their front valance and make a scrapping noise until they stop.
3) They then proceed to place the cones out in furure at a distance of 25m per cone.So that is a total distance of 100m for a one lane closure.

When you see them set out at the distance, it does look very safe and professional. :nowinktoday:

borris-bear

818 posts

265 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
At 90mph you would be doing about 40 metres per second so to swereve between 2 cones safely at that speed i would have thought the cones would need to be 80m apart giving you 2 seconds reaction and manouvere time? am i close?

tonyrec

Original Poster:

3,984 posts

275 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
No.

If we say that at 70mph a numpty driver is able to safely go between 2 cones (the first 2 )only then that is pretty close.

For the benefit of our training, we 'know' that at around 90mph we can still get through the cones if all else fails.

Hope that this makes it a little bit clearer. All im trying to illustrate is the gap between the first 2 cones viewed by the driver.

V8 Archie

4,703 posts

268 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
tonyrec said:
a distance of 25m per cone
Do I win a prize?

hughesie2

12,676 posts

302 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
But if you were the one that put the cones there you'd know they were there and wouldnt need to go through them at 90mph

V8 Archie

4,703 posts

268 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
Tony just enjoys slalom days too much .

tonyrec

Original Poster:

3,984 posts

275 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
Its just toooo tempting when its not your cones or your car, lol

richard sails

813 posts

279 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
V8 Archie said:
Tony just enjoys slalom days too much .


sounds like Tony should join the autotest at the next Back Home

Pies

13,116 posts

276 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
totally

pbrettle

3,280 posts

303 months

Friday 14th November 2003
quotequote all
Approached an accident on the A303 once and had to stamp on the brakes to avoid the patrol car when I came over the brow of a hill - got pulled and seriously ticked off....

Funny thing was I wasnt speeding and there was no warning.... so went back and checked it out - low and behold the flimsy plastic think they call a "Slow Police" sign had blown off the road and was down an embankment - so went back and get the plod that gave me hard time - one serious hard time back......

But you are absolutely right - not enough cones and all it takes is that crappy sign to be blown away and you are stuffed.....

Love the idea of those fast response motorway repair trucks on the M25 - really work and they are usually there at the same time as the police - loads of cones, nice big flashing signs etc.... for safety its excellent.