BMW 3 Coupe V Mercedes CLK
BMW 3 Coupe V Mercedes CLK
Author
Discussion

Killwilly

Original Poster:

446 posts

217 months

Monday 27th April 2009
quotequote all
Not quite sure if this is the right place to ask this question. Without wanting to start world war 3 here goes. I currently drive a BMW 320i 4 door saloon, 51 plate, and would like to get back to driving a coupe. I like the BMW coupe, but I also like the Mercedes CLK, to date I have driven neither.

My question is. Is there anyone on the forum that at some time owned both? Any comments for the pros and cons would be very much appreciated.

Pete 55

74 posts

229 months

Tuesday 28th April 2009
quotequote all
Depends entirely on what type of BMW 3 and CLK you are talking about (i.e., engine basically). Merc V8s are fantastic cruisers, but definitely more unwieldy on a track compared to an M3 or 335 E92 if that is your thing.

Killwilly

Original Poster:

446 posts

217 months

Tuesday 28th April 2009
quotequote all
Thanks Peter. I was thinking of a 325ci auto coupe and a similar spec in a CLK, not fussed about speed these days, but I do like comfort and the versatility of a coupe.

///M3

303 posts

212 months

Tuesday 28th April 2009
quotequote all
For a comfortable coupe, it's hard to beat a CLK.

Killwilly

Original Poster:

446 posts

217 months

Wednesday 29th April 2009
quotequote all
///M3 said:
For a comfortable coupe, it's hard to beat a CLK.
Alex, I note from your profile that you have owned both cars, if you had to make a choice, which one would you choose, taking into consideration everything, including reliability and running costs?


///M3

303 posts

212 months

Wednesday 29th April 2009
quotequote all
Hi there

The ones I have owned were old models, the W208 CLK (this was a convertible) and the E36 BMW 3 Series Coupe.

I don't think you want an E36 because these are really old and hard to find a nice one (and you refer to a 325Ci).

I'm not sure if you're referring to an E46 coupe or E92 coupe but I have been in a friend's BMW 323Ci Coupe (E46, pre-facelift) and as it was a non-sport, I felt the suspension was too soft and it felt wallowy.

As for CLKs, the one I owned was a convertible W208 (previous model) which was well built, smooth and powerful (320 engine). It was avantgarde spec which meant slightly harder suspension but this was a really comfortable car and I enjoyed owning it. It was the perfect balance between sports and comfort. It was not expensive to maintain/run either and reliability wise, nothing went wrong.

If you're talking about the newer model CLK (the W209), I would choose this for the comfort (I test drove the convertible once and it's quick enough in 350 form, but maybe a tad heavy) and as a relaxed cruiser.

If you like sportiness, perhaps a BMW 325Ci with the M sport pack, or for comfort, a CLK is a good choice (much better than a BMW without the M sport pack in my opinion).

Ultimately, you need to get a few test drives done smile

Edited by ///M3 on Wednesday 29th April 17:43

Killwilly

Original Poster:

446 posts

217 months

Thursday 30th April 2009
quotequote all
Many thanks Alex, brilliant information exactly what I wanted to know. Whatever car I choose would be no more than 3 years old. The new 3 series and the CLK look very similar in shape. I think my next step will be to test drive both.

Once again many thanks to everyone.