amber check engine light XKR
amber check engine light XKR
Author
Discussion

NST

Original Poster:

1,523 posts

266 months

Wednesday 29th April 2009
quotequote all


MrsNST has phone to tell me the battery light is amber (check engine light) car drives normally though, no other problems..

any idea as to what it could be? weak battery? the car has been sitting around alot recently doing not alot..

just waiting for jag assist to come and have a look.

cheers

NST

NST

Original Poster:

1,523 posts

266 months

Wednesday 29th April 2009
quotequote all
the report from jag assist says a 02 sensor or worse case a cat converter..

i really hope its not the cat.. i would expect jag to charge a fortune to replace it.

The Leaper

5,487 posts

229 months

Wednesday 29th April 2009
quotequote all
NST,

I have an S-Type 4.2 V8, 5 years old, and I had the same warning light problem a couple of months ago. Performance seemed unaffected. Turned out to be the MAF sensor needed replacement. Done under warranty.

R.

NST

Original Poster:

1,523 posts

266 months

Wednesday 29th April 2009
quotequote all
Thanks Leaper,

I have the paper work with me and it states the code thrown up is P0430 Catalyst Efficiency Below Threshold. it could be one of three things, cat is indeed bust, o2 sensor or a exhaust leak?

anyone shed more light on this code?

cheers

Tame Technician

2,467 posts

227 months

Wednesday 29th April 2009
quotequote all
P0430 Catalyst Efficiency Below Threshold

Means the CAT had it. 99.9% of the time, only way it can mean anything else is if the down stream lambda's gone wrong, but then you get the lambda fault code also.

You have up and down stream lambda's on that, so it knows what the gasses are like before and after, it they dont get cleaned up enough after going though the cat, it logs that code.

Will only be one bank though (should say on the diag printout) I think 430 is bank 2 (the passenger side). The cat brick usually has a crank in it, but sometime they brake up and you can hear it when you hammer the casing.

NST

Original Poster:

1,523 posts

266 months

Wednesday 29th April 2009
quotequote all
Tame Technician said:
P0430 Catalyst Efficiency Below Threshold

Means the CAT had it. 99.9% of the time, only way it can mean anything else is if the down stream lambda's gone wrong, but then you get the lambda fault code also.

You have up and down stream lambda's on that, so it knows what the gasses are like before and after, it they dont get cleaned up enough after going though the cat, it logs that code.

Will only be one bank though (should say on the diag printout) I think 430 is bank 2 (the passenger side). The cat brick usually has a crank in it, but sometime they brake up and you can hear it when you hammer the casing.
Thanks Tame Technician,

would the car pass a MOT knowing the cat has had it? the car is due a MOT in the next couple of weeks.. so it would have to get done asap! how much is a cat?!

cheers

NST

Tame Technician

2,467 posts

227 months

Wednesday 29th April 2009
quotequote all
Ask the tester nicely to put the probe in the drivers side exhaust pipe and you might be ok. But its highly unlikely to pass on the side with the inefficient CAT.

Tame Technician

2,467 posts

227 months

Wednesday 29th April 2009
quotequote all
3 years ago they were £600 + fitting. NO idea what they are now.

NST

Original Poster:

1,523 posts

266 months

Thursday 30th April 2009
quotequote all
thanks,

i thought it might be around that figure. for that price i might be tempted by some 200 cell sports cats.

are they easy to to fit?

would it be worth me disconnecting the battery to clear the code and see if it disappears?

cheers
NST

NST

Original Poster:

1,523 posts

266 months

Thursday 30th April 2009
quotequote all
would it be a good idea to swap the lamda sensors over from the other bank to confirm it is the cat? it is easy to remove the lamda and re fit?
cheers

Tame Technician

2,467 posts

227 months

Thursday 30th April 2009
quotequote all
Dont bother disconnecting the battery. Even if you clear the code, you are only putting the light out, you wont join the cracked pieces of CAT back together and magically pass and MOT.

If you have a code reader and can clear the memory and then re check it after some time, then Yes swaping down stream lambdas is a very good idea and the best way to confirm its the CAT. NO one in the trade would do this cos its to time consuming.

The cats and sensor are quite difficult to change (no forget that, very). But just hard to get on stuff, not actually alot to it. Passenger side is easier as there's no EGR rubish in the way.

Look at the back of the manifold and there's 4 nuts at the top. Also two bolts at the bottom, they go into the bell houseand and have a support braket on them. Then its just the exhaust clamp and the CATS off (sounds dead easy doesnt it). But have a look at the car and you will see what I mean.

http://www.autobytel.com/images/carPics/TestDrv/Ly...
At the back move that coolant bottle and you should be able to see it.

Its the large rusty thing shown nicely here.
http://images.jaguar-enthusiasts.org.uk/assets/cla...




Edited by Tame Technician on Thursday 30th April 20:18

NST

Original Poster:

1,523 posts

266 months

Friday 1st May 2009
quotequote all
Tame Technician said:
Dont bother disconnecting the battery. Even if you clear the code, you are only putting the light out, you wont join the cracked pieces of CAT back together and magically pass and MOT.

If you have a code reader and can clear the memory and then re check it after some time, then Yes swaping down stream lambdas is a very good idea and the best way to confirm its the CAT. NO one in the trade would do this cos its to time consuming.

The cats and sensor are quite difficult to change (no forget that, very). But just hard to get on stuff, not actually alot to it. Passenger side is easier as there's no EGR rubish in the way.

Look at the back of the manifold and there's 4 nuts at the top. Also two bolts at the bottom, they go into the bell houseand and have a support braket on them. Then its just the exhaust clamp and the CATS off (sounds dead easy doesnt it). But have a look at the car and you will see what I mean.

http://www.autobytel.com/images/carPics/TestDrv/Ly...
At the back move that coolant bottle and you should be able to see it.

Its the large rusty thing shown nicely here.
http://images.jaguar-enthusiasts.org.uk/assets/cla...




Edited by Tame Technician on Thursday 30th April 20:18
thanks, just what i wanted to know, i have access to a garage with a lift etc so hopefully this weekend i shall get this checked out.

on a plus point i spoke to a couple of dealers and they all think its the sensor, but if i'm unlucky its the cat. which costs £450

Tame Technician

2,467 posts

227 months

Friday 1st May 2009
quotequote all
Best of luck, if you find you have too remove the CAT to swap the sensors (and I dont think you do), get a set of the four studs and nuts before you start, as they often shear, not a problem of course if it happens later when you fit a new CAT, but a major inconvenience, if you are putting it straight back on.

Dont panic if this happens, they are Quite easy to extract once the CATs removed, as long as you heat the CAT until is glowing with a gas torch.

I know the dealers said sensor, but I'm 99.9% sure, and I did used to do lots of these, that you will find its the CAT. £450 seems ALMOST reasonable though.

NST

Original Poster:

1,523 posts

266 months

Friday 1st May 2009
quotequote all
Tame Technician said:
Best of luck, if you find you have too remove the CAT to swap the sensors (and I dont think you do), get a set of the four studs and nuts before you start, as they often shear, not a problem of course if it happens later when you fit a new CAT, but a major inconvenience, if you are putting it straight back on.

Dont panic if this happens, they are Quite easy to extract once the CATs removed, as long as you heat the CAT until is glowing with a gas torch.

I know the dealers said sensor, but I'm 99.9% sure, and I did used to do lots of these, that you will find its the CAT. £450 seems ALMOST reasonable though.
thanks for the info!

i will keep you informed of how badly i mess it up!

NST

Original Poster:

1,523 posts

266 months

Wednesday 13th May 2009
quotequote all
The car the passed the MOT with flying colours, they reset the fault code and as it happens it hasn't come back in the last 220miles or so). i didn't get a chance to swap the lambda sensors. The warranty company is coming to check the car to pass/fail the claim for the cat today so hopefully i should get some good news..

update:

warranty guy came and went and asked the dealer what they wanted to claim for as everything on the car seemed ok.. they checked the car over with system check etc and came back with nothing. all ok.

i'm starting to wonder if the battery needs replacing, i've started to get the trac not avail warning come up sometimes, but this only occurs when the car has been sitting around for a week or so. i'm wondering if the lambda sensor returned the error due to a battery being slightly week.

cheers

Edited by NST on Thursday 14th May 08:11

Cecil

337 posts

214 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
Hi,

I was having similar issues with "TRAC NOT AVAIL" coming up more and more frequently, at first it was when the car was left for a couple of weeks, eventually it was showing after just three days, coupled with a DSC error, then I got the amber check engine light, after the battery was replaced and I cleared the fault code the "TRAC NOT AVAIL" only came back once, on a very very wet evening, with several inches of standing water on the road. I will be firing her up for the first time in a couple of weeks on Sunday, will let you know if either the lambda fault code or the "TRAC NOT AVAIL" comes back. I am pretty sure it was the battery.

Cecil

NST

Original Poster:

1,523 posts

266 months

Saturday 16th May 2009
quotequote all
Thanks Cecil,

Keep us in formed.
cheers
NST


Cecil

337 posts

214 months

Monday 18th May 2009
quotequote all
Fired up after 17 days standing, sprang to life on first crank, no errors or warnings, I got a Varta heavy duty 95 amp/hour, seems to have done the trick. Good luck

NST

Original Poster:

1,523 posts

266 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
Cecil said:
Fired up after 17 days standing, sprang to life on first crank, no errors or warnings, I got a Varta heavy duty 95 amp/hour, seems to have done the trick. Good luck
i'm also looking at a heavy duty battery as well, did you order online?

Cecil

337 posts

214 months

Tuesday 19th May 2009
quotequote all
No, I fortunatly live very close to a battery specialist, paid around £120 from memory.