205 GTi 1.9 8v compared to mi16/GTi-6 etc?
205 GTi 1.9 8v compared to mi16/GTi-6 etc?
Author
Discussion

Emubiker

Original Poster:

954 posts

201 months

Friday 8th May 2009
quotequote all
Ok, i have a 1991 miami blue 205 GTi 1.9 8v. Now i know it isnt built for the quarter mile runs but i love it too much to take to the track (have a corsa for that) but was just at crail this weekend and got a 15.622. this is with an engine i had dyno'd at 152.5 bhp and 132lb-ft (at ecosse). The car is original aprt from engine and suspension so still has all the interior etc. I previously ran a 16.1 with the engine at 128.5 bhp last year (all times include a passenger).

Was just wondering how these compare to others and mi16/GTi-6's etc.

I am currently interested in a 2.0 turbo converted 205 too so any times of thses would be helpfull too

BennettRacing

729 posts

232 months

Friday 8th May 2009
quotequote all
Emubiker said:
Ok, i have a 1991 miami blue 205 GTi 1.9 8v. Now i know it isnt built for the quarter mile runs but i love it too much to take to the track (have a corsa for that) but was just at crail this weekend and got a 15.622. this is with an engine i had dyno'd at 152.5 bhp and 132lb-ft (at ecosse). The car is original aprt from engine and suspension so still has all the interior etc. I previously ran a 16.1 with the engine at 128.5 bhp last year (all times include a passenger).

Was just wondering how these compare to others and mi16/GTi-6's etc.

I am currently interested in a 2.0 turbo converted 205 too so any times of thses would be helpfull too
Put an mi16 lump in. I did one, wont regret it, they fly. I got rid of it in the end as I am quite sure I would of got killed in it, I HAD to drive it flat out and its not a good thing. Get to 4000 in one of them and they take off, lovely engine.


veryoldfart

1,739 posts

226 months

Saturday 9th May 2009
quotequote all
Id leave the passenger out next time....

SVTRick

3,633 posts

216 months

Sunday 10th May 2009
quotequote all
Get a Red one.
Bound to be worth a few 10/th on the quarter

Scottish_ninja

370 posts

207 months

Friday 22nd May 2009
quotequote all
Need to work on the driving a little i think mate.

You should be running at least flat 15's at crail with that power.

About 4years ago my completely standard 133bhp starlet was running those times. With a few tweaks it was running 155bhp and 14.7's. And with a complete overhaul it was running 211bhp and 13.99s.

Stephen.

Howitzer

2,863 posts

237 months

Tuesday 26th May 2009
quotequote all
Keep the 1.9 8V, it's a cracking engine and suits the car perfectly.

One more butchered 405 and slightly quicker 205 is not worth the extra work imo.

Pop some throttle bodies on, they sound incredible on that gem of an engine.

Dave!

Emubiker

Original Poster:

954 posts

201 months

Tuesday 14th July 2009
quotequote all
its seems reasonably comparitive to the redtop corsa etc though, plus the starlet should have a bit more torque, and its not a high revving engine so gear changes come quickly even with the 1.9 box. On one of the other forums its also quicker than a 170bhp clio 16v phase 1.

You also need to realise that when new the 0-60 was 7.9 and when balance motorsport did their 205 track car:

http://www.balancemotorsport.co.uk/main.asp?catego...

with a dyno proven 121 bhp and stripped down to 810 kg it managed a 15.9 second time. Which put its power to weight in at 149per tonne, considering mine still has full interior and power steering, electric windows etc it will be a fair bit heavier.

Also if you compare a 205 to a 106 the 106 will easily beat them in a quick drag race. 0-60 in 7.6 standard with 120 bhp compared to the 7.9 of the 205 with 128 bhp.

Emubiker

Original Poster:

954 posts

201 months

Friday 17th July 2009
quotequote all
Scottish_ninja said:
Need to work on the driving a little i think mate.

You should be running at least flat 15's at crail with that power.

About 4years ago my completely standard 133bhp starlet was running those times. With a few tweaks it was running 155bhp and 14.7's. And with a complete overhaul it was running 211bhp and 13.99s.

Stephen.
Also been searching around and the Starlet has standard times of 7.3 to 60 and passes the quarter at 15.6, compared to as i said the 7.9 of the 205 and 16.2 quarter