Quartz vs. Automatic
Quartz vs. Automatic
Author
Discussion

bikemonster

Original Poster:

1,188 posts

264 months

Friday 8th May 2009
quotequote all
Hi All

Mrs Bikemonster and I are contemplating treating ourselves to nice (subjective, I know) watches. We have both been looking at Longines - a HydroConquest for me and Dolce Vita or Evidenza for SWMBO.

Is there a difference in automatic vs. quartz in terms of a watch's ability to hold value? We are not buying to resell, but at the same time I'd like to think that the money spent on a decent watch is not psssst against the wall.

FWIW, I do have a preference for an automatic watch for no other reason than that, rightly or wrongly, I feel that there is something a bit special about a mechanical device that can measure the time with a degree of accuracy.

Opinions please....

James

andy tims

5,598 posts

269 months

Friday 8th May 2009
quotequote all
If your priority is the ability to hold value:-

1) Buy pre-owned
2) Buy mechanical






Edited by andy tims on Friday 8th May 22:13

Ikemi

8,610 posts

228 months

Friday 8th May 2009
quotequote all
A quartz watch will always be more accurate than an automatic watch and depending on the watch, will offer more features for less money. However an automatic watch will appeal more to buyers if you do choose to sell and therefore be worth more second hand smile

I'd personally opt for an automatic, as I feel it is far more special and gives the watch more character. Think of the engineering behind the movement; the unwinding of the mainspring, the balance wheel moving tens of thousands of times per hour and the hairspring controlling the oscillations ... Also, I quite like the fact that it relies on my motion to power the watch smile It does mean you have to wear the watch often (or buy a watch winder!) if you don't want to keep setting the time and date constantly.

Here is some automatic porn:


Gingerbread Man

9,173 posts

236 months

Friday 8th May 2009
quotequote all
A quartz watch will always be a battery powered watch.

bikemonster

Original Poster:

1,188 posts

264 months

Friday 8th May 2009
quotequote all
Thanks guys - nice to see that I'm thinking sort of straight.

I'm not worried about depreciation, just checking whether my own prejudices are weird or in line with everybody else's.

As I posted in a watch winder thread, I have an old Omega Constelation automatic, so I am familiar with the hassles of adjusting an automatic watch after it has been sitting for a while. And with that watch the only way to adjust the date is by winding through the days. So changing the date from e.g., the 20th to the 19th means advancing the watch through a month!

Agreed with the comments re: the wonderful intricacy of a mechanical (non quartz) movement.

James

Papoo

3,907 posts

221 months

Friday 8th May 2009
quotequote all
As stated, there is more character and desirability to an automatic, and the engineering is a big step up from a quartz.

That said, I've a few watches, mostly automatics, but my everyday tool watch is Breitling quartz which I've had for 10 years. I got it for just that - everyday functionality. It's tough as old boots, keeps perfect time, and withstands the day to day knocks brilliantly, while still being distictly Breitling. So, I'm deslighted with it.

I personally think that I would prefer automatics for 'occasion' watches, or non-everyday ones. When I want to tell the time, and not worry about the complexities of the automatic. It's just engineering snobbery, to be honest. I love good automatic movements, as I said, but you'll have to get the movement serviced at similar intervals as battery changing on a decent quartz, so you won't save that way.

deejuic

396 posts

206 months

Saturday 9th May 2009
quotequote all
Also, don't forget that you will likely need to get the automatic serviced every 3-5-7 years which isn't cheap. Depending on whether you do send back to the factory vs. a local shop for a cleaning, you may end up spending a lot of money on maintenance, which makes the point of holding value somewhat moot.

The cost on replacing a battery is significantly cheaper.

Stitch

933 posts

240 months

Monday 11th May 2009
quotequote all
My wife has a Dolce Vita -

They do the watch in a couple of sizes and with/without diamond hour markers.

She has the smaller size (tiny wrists) and wears it on a strap rather than the supplied bracelet.

I have to say that it is a lovely watch and when you read up on Longines, they have a fantastic history (Weems watch, Lindbergh watch etc).

I have taken to the brand to such an extent my next purchase is likely to be the dive watch from their historic range
- a really nice, understated piece. a guy has posted pics in the wrist watch thread if you are interested

cramorra

1,687 posts

258 months

Monday 11th May 2009
quotequote all
Automatic is the obvious choice for a watch if you want it to be more than just a time indicator (that you don#t need if you carry your mobile phone...)
However this side of a rolex daytona 8and even here the hype has - thankfully stopped) you won't make money with a watch - you'll just loose less if you buy smart, look after it and need to sell

bikemonster

Original Poster:

1,188 posts

264 months

Monday 11th May 2009
quotequote all
Thanks for the responses guys. It's nice to see that my evaluation of Longines as a brand is about right.

There's no thought of getting rich by buying a watch, just wondering what type of watch is likely to prove a better store of value.

Keep 'em coming!

James

lowdrag

13,144 posts

236 months

Monday 11th May 2009
quotequote all
(stage left, in robotic voice)

"quartz is not human. exterminate, exterminate"

Enter stage left:-

"Automatic for the people. Rapid eye movement"

With apologies to whoever.

The choice is youra, but make the right choice.

bikemonster

Original Poster:

1,188 posts

264 months

Monday 11th May 2009
quotequote all
It looks very much like SWMBO will get a quartz Evidenza. The automatic is a special import here in Brightest Africa, which makes the automatic nearly twice the price of a quartz. That might be a wise move though, because Mrs Bikemonster doesn't get starry eyed about watches, so having to set the date and time after not wearing the watch for a few days/weeks will not impress her.

As for me, you guys would have had to have sais some really ugly stuff about automatic watches to sway me from them.

(Yes, I do know about watch winders, but no, I don't want one.)

James

leginigel

428 posts

207 months

Monday 11th May 2009
quotequote all
Get a watch winder as it's all part of the fun.

lowdrag

13,144 posts

236 months

Monday 11th May 2009
quotequote all
Hey, a watch is a watch, but an automatic is for ever. Don't let us try and influence yousoapbox

bikemonster

Original Poster:

1,188 posts

264 months

Monday 11th May 2009
quotequote all
I know from automatic watches!

A long time ago, in a galaxy far away, for my 21st birthday I received a late 60's Omega Constellation which had belonged to my grandfather. On that particular watch the only way to move the date back by one is to move it forward by 30, which means 30x24 hours of winding forward. It's all part of what makes a special watch special.

AB

19,547 posts

218 months

Monday 11th May 2009
quotequote all
Gingerbread Man said:
A quartz watch will always be a battery powered watch.
http://www.watches1st.co.uk/acatalog/Mens-Seiko-Kinetic-Chronograph-SNL041P2.html
http://www.overstock.com/Jewelry-Watches/Citizen-E...

andy_s

19,785 posts

282 months

Monday 11th May 2009
quotequote all
AB said:
Gingerbread Man said:
A quartz watch will always be a battery powered watch.
http://www.watches1st.co.uk/acatalog/Mens-Seiko-Kinetic-Chronograph-SNL041P2.html
http://www.overstock.com/Jewelry-Watches/Citizen-E...
Edited for being dim. Carry on.

Edited by andy_s on Monday 11th May 22:48

AB

19,547 posts

218 months

Monday 11th May 2009
quotequote all
andy_s said:
AB said:
Gingerbread Man said:
A quartz watch will always be a battery powered watch.
http://www.watches1st.co.uk/acatalog/Mens-Seiko-Kinetic-Chronograph-SNL041P2.html
http://www.overstock.com/Jewelry-Watches/Citizen-E...
Edited for being dim. Carry on.

Edited by andy_s on Monday 11th May 22:48
tongue out

deejuic

396 posts

206 months

Tuesday 12th May 2009
quotequote all
"Citizen Eco-Drive technology never needs a battery; it harnesses the power from any natural or artificial light source and converts it into energy which is stored in an Eco-Drive energy cell. It recharges continuously in any kind of light to run forever."

hmm... wouldn't an Eco-Drive energy cell constitute a battery? I thought that was the definition of a battery. Battery = energy cell?

smile

AB

19,547 posts

218 months

Wednesday 13th May 2009
quotequote all
deejuic said:
"Citizen Eco-Drive technology never needs a battery;
Are we being pedantic now? Hehe.

You said the above yourself.