Project Stumpjumper Single Speed
Project Stumpjumper Single Speed
Author
Discussion

spikeyplanet

Original Poster:

185 posts

283 months

Friday 5th June 2009
quotequote all
I'm building up a little project single speeder - I haven't been out on my bike[s] in years and thought it would be a good way to get back into it.

The donor bike is a '96 Specialized Stumpjumper A1 FS [matt black for those interested, owned from new]. Originally run on Rockshox Quadra 21r's [which I still have at my folks house somewhere, must dig them out...] which brings me to my first question.

I'm going to be running rigid forks on it. My choices have been narrowed down to 42.5cm or 44.5cm , carbon or aluminium. 42.5cm fork is suitable for bike with 0-80mm travel forks, the 44.5 for 100mm travel forks. I'm pretty sure that the 42.5's will be the 'correct' fork, but interested to hear your thoughts on running a longer fork. It was running on Judy 100s set with loads of sag.
Carbon Vs Aluminium - I'm thinking carbon might soften the buzz off the trail slightly? but on a budget - might plump for the alu ones [and they match the frame]

Other bits I'm cosidereing - Mavic crossride wheels and maybe a carbon seat post, xt v brake levers.

I'll post some pics when I get chance.

mikee boy

967 posts

274 months

Friday 5th June 2009
quotequote all
Sound like an interesting project. I'd go for the forks that look the best, regardless of cost.

What gearing are you planning? I've always struggled with the concept of a single-speed MTB because I never stay in the same gear for more than about a minute.

mk1fan

10,850 posts

248 months

Friday 5th June 2009
quotequote all
Go for the 425mm a-c height forks.

Carbon does have a real dampening effect and is - imo - worth it on a rigid. I run carbon bars and seatost on my Inbred commuter and it gave a significant improvement in comfort on the terrible London streets.

No substitute for suspension though so don't think it will be.

Edited by mk1fan on Friday 5th June 14:23

spikeyplanet

Original Poster:

185 posts

283 months

Friday 5th June 2009
quotequote all
mikee boy said:
What gearing are you planning? I've always struggled with the concept of a single-speed MTB because I never stay in the same gear for more than about a minute.
32/16 seems a pretty common ratio in the single speed world, so I'm going to start there and see.

smile

edited to add quote.

Edited by spikeyplanet on Friday 5th June 11:38

Matt H

542 posts

245 months

Friday 5th June 2009
quotequote all
Go carbon - anything that will help.

My hands are still sore after doing Llandegla blacks on a rigid single speed (forks are Kona project 2's).

pdV6

16,442 posts

284 months

Friday 5th June 2009
quotequote all
I run 100mm-corrected Project2's on my commuting bike, simply because nobody had stock of 80mm-corrected ones when I needed them.

Looks a bit weird, so for that reason if no other, I'd go for the 42.5 ones if you can get them.

spikeyplanet

Original Poster:

185 posts

283 months

Friday 5th June 2009
quotequote all
Nice one, thanks for the replies chaps!
Carbon forks looks like the way to go then - which means that the carbon seatpost is a must!! wink

JPJ

421 posts

272 months

Friday 5th June 2009
quotequote all
Don't worry about the carbon seatpost, you'll be stood up most of the time, particularly as you get to grips with the art of mono-cogging. :-)