1976 911 2.7

Author
Discussion

tuscan_thunder

Original Poster:

1,763 posts

247 months

Tuesday 9th December 2003
quotequote all
hi, can anyone give me performance and engine stats for the above?

also any key areas i should look for if buying one? i know it has new stainless steel heat exchangers and has a wad of history.

cheers

rubystone

11,254 posts

260 months

Tuesday 9th December 2003
quotequote all
I wouldn't touch one with a bargepole unless it had the word "Carrera" on the engine lid which is unlikely given that this is a 1976 car.

All IMHO but based on weak engines, low power, undesirability and experience of having looked at about 10 of the damn things back in 1986 when looking to buy my first 911. Buy a good SC.

clubsport

7,260 posts

259 months

Tuesday 9th December 2003
quotequote all
if it has carrera on the engine lid of a 1976 car it will have a 3.0 litr in it anyhow.
the reg 2.7 model is not the 911's finest hour.Depending on state of engine tune i would look for about 140 mph & 6.5-7.0 Secs to the magic 60mph.
These cars are heavier and more federalised than previous models. For a 1976 car it should just creep under the galvanised deadline, but you will be buying on condition, as stated above a 3.0 SC is a much better car and a safer bet.

domster

8,431 posts

271 months

Tuesday 9th December 2003
quotequote all
Or a 3.2 Carrera from 1984 onwards (best after 1988 with the G50 box) are even better...

Would suggest a LHD 1989 3.2 for about 10k or just under.

williamp

19,265 posts

274 months

Tuesday 9th December 2003
quotequote all
Or even a 944 turbo. Easily quicker then all of those mentioned above. Beautifully engineered and safe to drive quickly.

Also you can but a decent one for about £5,000. I did!

>> Edited by williamp on Tuesday 9th December 13:10

tuscan_thunder

Original Poster:

1,763 posts

247 months

Tuesday 9th December 2003
quotequote all
yeh, i know an SC would be better but money is an issue. also, 911s are a wee bit thin on the ground in my neck of the woods.

been down the 944 turbo route. 911 just is so much of an icon really. thought a 2.7 might be a nice entry to the 911 scheme of things. maybe saving and going for an SC would be better.

btw, anyone like to recommend an approx. price for said 2.7. silver, nice condition etc?

clubsport

7,260 posts

259 months

Tuesday 9th December 2003
quotequote all
mad to put a price on it really,as if somthg goes wrong you may need to spend £1000 on some part or other to £3000 for a top end rebuild to god knows what if it needs any serious bodywork.
As you say nice & it's silver that makes it easier to price say £7500-8000.....Porsche this age should be bought on condition,there is no classic premium for this model. good call on the 944 lark,,fine cars but once you have experience of a 911 it's difficult to go back.

rubystone

11,254 posts

260 months

Tuesday 9th December 2003
quotequote all
Tuscan Thunder (are you a native North American by any chance?)

There are cheap SCs out there too at the £7k mark but there's a fair chance they are dogs too. Buying a car of this age is really about condition if you're not too bothered about outright performance.

So buy on condition first and do get an independent inspection from a Porche specialist and make sure they take a long hard look at the bodywork. Some OPCs only check out the mechanicals, which can often be cheaper to put right than a corroded tub.

henry-F

4,791 posts

246 months

Tuesday 9th December 2003
quotequote all
You would be very lucky if the 2.7 is indeed a very nice car. Regardless of the merits or demerits of the model in general it`s a very old car and an incredibly small number are ever in good condition. Most of them can be valued by weight !

How much have you got to spend on a car ?

domster

8,431 posts

271 months

Wednesday 10th December 2003
quotequote all
To be honest, if you can't afford 10k, you shouldn't be looking at a 911.

Get a nice 944 or something.

A doggy 911 can cost a lot to put right - I have known SC bodywork/paint bills coming in at 7-8k.

I doubt you will save money buying a lot cheaper than 10k. You will probably spend the difference in the frist year putting it right. Bargains will be LHD 3.2s which are a lot more sorted and cost less to run. You may find one for 8500-9000 which won't bite.

henry-F

4,791 posts

246 months

Wednesday 10th December 2003
quotequote all
Bloody hell Dom. That`s almost good advice!! Much more of that and I won`t be able to tell people how much bo**ocks and bu** sh*t there is on web forums. I`ll be able to unplug the computer and go off in search of sunshine.

Listen to the man, he may be ugly but talks a lot of sense.

Henry

domster

8,431 posts

271 months

Wednesday 10th December 2003
quotequote all


I aim to please.

(Rarely Henry, though, it must be admitted.)