PH Grammar police - can you check this for me?
PH Grammar police - can you check this for me?
Author
Discussion

Goochie

Original Poster:

5,757 posts

241 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
In the phrase "Dave's got it covered" should the apostrophe be there or or after the S ??

Has anyone got a simple way to remember where it should go and when?


captainzep

13,306 posts

214 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
How many 'Daves'?

Puggit

49,430 posts

270 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
You are removing the ha from has - therefore the apostrophe is in the correct place.

Only goes after an s if it's a plural possessive apostrophe.


Edited cos I got is/has mixed up rolleyes

Edited by Puggit on Tuesday 30th June 14:57

james_gt3rs

4,816 posts

213 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
The sentence means "Dave has got it covered", so you are correct.

maxrider

2,481 posts

258 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
Dave has got it covered = Dave's got it covered.
The apostrophe replaces the missing 'ha'

Goochie

Original Poster:

5,757 posts

241 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
So when would you put an apostrophe after the S ?

james_tigerwoods

16,344 posts

219 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
Goochie said:
So when would you put an apostrophe after the S ?
"James' got it covered"

Waits to be flamed/corrected

HRG.

72,863 posts

261 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
Goochie said:
So when would you put an apostrophe after the S ?
The Daves' have got it covered.

captainzep

13,306 posts

214 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
Correct.

Or the cyrillic pluperfectionate "The Geeses' honk"

I think we all deserve a round of applause's!

lunarscope

2,901 posts

264 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
Not apostrophe required as the sentence should read: "Dave has it covered". There is no need for the chav word: "got". wink

carmadgaz

3,204 posts

205 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
captainzep said:
Correct.

Or the cyrillic pluperfectionate "The Geeses' honk"

I think we all deserve a round of applause's!
clap

james_tigerwoods

16,344 posts

219 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
Surely, in that case, the correct phrase should be "What would Dave do?" - Dave knows what he's doing so all's well in the world smile

monthefish

20,467 posts

253 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
james_tigerwoods said:
Goochie said:
So when would you put an apostrophe after the S ?
"James' got it covered"

Waits to be flamed/corrected
I think if it was "the house belonging to James" it would be

"James' house"

Eric Mc

124,715 posts

287 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
Why not just say "Dave is dealing with it".

I have it on authority that the last ever lesson given in an English school on the proper use of the apostrophe was on 13 March 1978.

What a mess we've allowed to occur in this country regarding the teaching of English to our own children.
We should be ashamed of ourselves.

Nightmare

5,277 posts

306 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
Whose house?
Runs' house!

Alex

9,978 posts

306 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
monthefish said:
james_tigerwoods said:
Goochie said:
So when would you put an apostrophe after the S ?
"James' got it covered"

Waits to be flamed/corrected
I think if it was "the house belonging to James" it would be

"James' house"
Incorrect. That would be "James's house."

Should the full-stop in the above sentence be inside or outside the quotes? wobble

V8mate

45,899 posts

211 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
Alex said:
monthefish said:
james_tigerwoods said:
Goochie said:
So when would you put an apostrophe after the S ?
"James' got it covered"

Waits to be flamed/corrected
I think if it was "the house belonging to James" it would be

"James' house"
Incorrect. That would be "James's house."

Should the full-stop in the above sentence be inside or outside the quotes? wobble
The extra 's' following a noun ending in an 's' showing possession isn't obligatory.

So 'James' house' is perfectly acceptable.

Goochie

Original Poster:

5,757 posts

241 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Why not just say "Dave is dealing with it".

I have it on authority that the last ever lesson given in an English school on the proper use of the apostrophe was on 13 March 1978.

What a mess we've allowed to occur in this country regarding the teaching of English to our own children.
We should be ashamed of ourselves.
Indeed we should. However, I was only born in 1980 so that explains my need to ask.

It is not a sentence that I'm going to use, it is a phrase on some marketing bumph that we have in the office and there was some debate on the correct grammar. "Dave" is actually a substitute for the word that has been used but both of them are names that do not end in S so it should make no difference.

james_tigerwoods

16,344 posts

219 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
Let's not get started on the correct usage of its and it's

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

247 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
james_tigerwoods said:
Goochie said:
So when would you put an apostrophe after the S ?
"James' got it covered"

Waits to be flamed/corrected
You wouldn't say that at all - you wouldn't contract the "has" if the noun ends in an S. Try saying it out loud and you'll see what I mean.