Extreme macro project
Author
Discussion

rasputin

Original Poster:

1,449 posts

236 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
Today, I 'arv been mostly...

Hatching an insane idea hehe

Unfortunately I didn't listen to my better instincts, so I now have in the mail:

One very cheap compact camera (Vivitar V3188)
and
One set of M42 extension tubes

My plan:
Perform some surgery on the camera and remove the lens.
Glue M42 extension tubes in position.
Fit M42 lens

So as well as the extension tubes giving me the usual macro range, combined with the very small image sensor the crop factor would be pretty big!

So...

I should have asked before buying biggrin...

Can this work?

jon-

16,534 posts

246 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
I don't know if this will work, but it is an awesome project! I just wish you'd bought the equipment off amazon, just to see "Customers who bought this compact camera also bought: M42 Extension tubes" hehebiggrin

SamHH

5,078 posts

246 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
Looking at the photos of that camera on the Web, I can't see how you're going to mount the extension tubes to it. I'm interested to see what happens though; post some pictures up.

johnnywgk

2,579 posts

212 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
Done something simular years ago with pentax SLR, not quite as dramatic, but used old toilet rolls as extension tubes with, ehem! selotape to hold it all together.

Not sure about your camera, but can't see it not working.

Good luck, and post the results.

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

255 months

Tuesday 30th June 2009
quotequote all
I gaffa taped a reversed FD lens to my sigma macro biggrin

Can't find the pics right now, but I got serious magnification

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

278 months

Wednesday 1st July 2009
quotequote all
Reminds me of when I did this:



Which gets some fairly extreme magnification - these are grains of sugar!



To the OP - I'm not convinced this project will work. I'd guess even a very cheap camera will have some electrical contact with the lens, and will spit the dummy if you disconnect that contact.

rasputin

Original Poster:

1,449 posts

236 months

Wednesday 1st July 2009
quotequote all
_dobbo_ said:
To the OP - I'm not convinced this project will work. I'd guess even a very cheap camera will have some electrical contact with the lens, and will spit the dummy if you disconnect that contact.
I did wonder about that.

I could try removing the lens elements, rather than the lens itself.

scratchchin

rasputin

Original Poster:

1,449 posts

236 months

Saturday 4th July 2009
quotequote all
Got it.

Opened it up.

Success - lens element screwed in but no electrical connection smile.

Like my high quality M42 Sellotape Mount? It's the deluxe version with black tape covering any light leaks hehe:





And here it is with the original lens - bit of a difference??



So... to the results!

Here was my ultra-sophisticated setup:


Ball point pen with some salt grains. Full Frame:


And a 100% crop:


Some pixels:




So yes... Not great image quality biggrin.

But an interesting experiment.

I think it has potential in a compact camera with a higher quality sensor. But even before demolishing this camera, the IQ was diabolical yuck

SamHH

5,078 posts

246 months

Saturday 4th July 2009
quotequote all
Cool. I didn't think you'd manage to get them together; nice work.

rasputin

Original Poster:

1,449 posts

236 months

Wednesday 8th July 2009
quotequote all
Tried something less extreme but more effective today.

M42 Mount + 2X Teleconverter + 2 small extension tubes + Carl Zeiss 135mm lens + "10+ Macro Diopter"



Results were very, very difficult to set up properly. But also very big!
Apologies for the deceased fly - I promise that's how I found him (although the right way up hehe)
The coin is a 5p.

Full Frame:


100% Crop:


Haven't worked out what macro ratio that is yet. Theoretically I could have done more - I have a third (bigger) extension tube I could add, and another (4+) diopter... But this was all I could manage to be honest and image quality is pretty dodgy as it is. Getting the focus right was a big job - the tiniest touch of the camera/lens would move it enough to ruin my efforts.
I had to shoot at F/22 (with the teleconverter I suppose that's F/44?) and still couldn't get the focus quite right after an hour of trying.

Mega respect to 4hero & co. for the results they get - sometimes even handheld eek!





EDIT: Just worked it out roughly - Around 3.4:1 so still not quite MPE-65 level hehe

Edited by rasputin on Wednesday 8th July 23:44

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

255 months

Wednesday 8th July 2009
quotequote all
Nicely done smile Tis fun to try out isn't it smile

I reactivated my Flickr account, so here are the results of the Scottish Jur...errr..my fooling around biggrin



Note expert use of professional materials wink

Result :



And with the macro lens on its own in front of a powered off LCD monitor (bounce flash off a white wall to the right)


jon-

16,534 posts

246 months

Thursday 9th July 2009
quotequote all
rasputin said:
Full Frame:
I'm eating my breakfast frown

Whitefly Swatter

1,131 posts

229 months

Thursday 9th July 2009
quotequote all
here is on I did some time ago



it was shot with an Olympus E3 with a set of bellows and a standard zukio 50mm f1,8
20 shots were stacked using combineZ to give the depth of field

I knew my old 35mm stuff would come in handy !

johnnywgk

2,579 posts

212 months

Saturday 11th July 2009
quotequote all
Nice work Rasputin, i new you'd get it to work