SCAMERA PARTNERSHIP BOMBSHELL
Discussion
Bombshell from another forum, by a long time contributor :
Ministers challenge - midlifecrisis Thu 11 Dec 03 18:45
With reference to the article on this site, challenging the ABD tp prove that speed cameras have only been installed in accident blackspots. As a Traffic Officer, I recently challenged those responsible in my Force about the positioning of newly installed cameras. They have been put in positions where I know for a fact that no accidents have happened. The response was that the 'insert road number here' has had a number of serious accidents in the last three years. I then pointed out that the road is around 40 miles long, but no specific point is a 'blackspot'. Certainly the places where the cameras have been installed are definitely not blackspots. I have also witnessed civilian admin workers altering accident reports, changing the conclusion from actual cause to 'excess speed'. When challenged they replied, "it looks better on the stats". I raised this with a senior officer, but never heard anything again.It is true that there are lies, damned lies and statistics.P.S. If anybody from the ABD wants to contatct me through this site, I'll tell them where the cameras are.
Ministers challenge - midlifecrisis Thu 11 Dec 03 18:45
With reference to the article on this site, challenging the ABD tp prove that speed cameras have only been installed in accident blackspots. As a Traffic Officer, I recently challenged those responsible in my Force about the positioning of newly installed cameras. They have been put in positions where I know for a fact that no accidents have happened. The response was that the 'insert road number here' has had a number of serious accidents in the last three years. I then pointed out that the road is around 40 miles long, but no specific point is a 'blackspot'. Certainly the places where the cameras have been installed are definitely not blackspots. I have also witnessed civilian admin workers altering accident reports, changing the conclusion from actual cause to 'excess speed'. When challenged they replied, "it looks better on the stats". I raised this with a senior officer, but never heard anything again.It is true that there are lies, damned lies and statistics.P.S. If anybody from the ABD wants to contatct me through this site, I'll tell them where the cameras are.
dick dastardly said:
Where did you get this from? Would be VERY interesting if the source could be verified!
Here (don't get involved, it's a motoring forum but there's a fair bit of anti-motoring matter and the moderators are tiresome)
www.honestjohn.co.uk/forum/post/index.htm?f=2&t=18320
Now why am I not surprised at that!!! When a socialist controlfreak government sets "targets" willynilly, then there are bound to be soem lazy barstewards who will "play" the system........ only here these are OUR EMPLOYEES!!!! They should be fired with no redress and certainly NO unemployment benefit as they are criminals!!!!
Apache said:
I thought this week seemed a bit intense, our hero P Garvin seems to have triggered something
You may be interested in this from Idris Francis. Durham are not the only ones not joining the scam.
Quote begins:
Yorkshire Police have no plans to join the netting off scheme.
>Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 19:02:58 -0000
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
>
>Confirmed again with the Press Office; North Yorkshire are not in the scheme
>and have no fixed cameras. No immediate plans to join.
>
>Roger
Tafia said:
Apache said:
I thought this week seemed a bit intense, our hero P Garvin seems to have triggered something
You may be interested in this from Idris Francis. Durham are not the only ones not joining the scam.
Quote begins:
Yorkshire Police have no plans to join the netting off scheme.
>Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 19:02:58 -0000
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
>
>Confirmed again with the Press Office; North Yorkshire are not in the scheme
>and have no fixed cameras. No immediate plans to join.
>
>Roger
Yes, I saw that, but the plot thickens. Here's my reply to Idris:
=======================
The DfT say North Yorkshire "joined 2003". Interesting!
www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/dft_rdsafety/documents/page/dft_rdsafety_507640.pdf
I've been maintaining a list of counties at
www.safespeed.org.uk/hypothecation.html
The following are NOT in the scheme:
Durham
Merseyside
Surrey
Central Scotland Police
Northern Constabulary
=================================
I have heard this morning that Surrey are supposed to be in the scam from April 2004
Best Regards,
Paul Smith
Safe Speed
www.safespeed.org.uk
Gassing Station | Speed, Plod & the Law | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



