Military Robot Could Feed on Dead Bodies
Military Robot Could Feed on Dead Bodies
Author
Discussion

Jimbeaux

Original Poster:

33,791 posts

260 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all

Overhaulin

1,670 posts

234 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Yes I can see it now.

Suicide BigMac Throwers that'll stop them in their tracks.

taldo

1,357 posts

223 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
that is just wrong on every level.

sneijder

5,231 posts

263 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Did I miss the news ? Did Skynet go live ?

ahdguy

279 posts

236 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Interesting....if it get hungry you had better be quick.

sneijder

5,231 posts

263 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
"We are sorry to inform you that your 18 year old son Jimmy was killed in action serving his country. We will not be able to release his body for a family funeral as it was gobbled up by a Steam-Punk-O-Tron-3000. You'll be pleased to know the energy Jimmys still warm corpse provided meant the giant Deathbot could negotiate roughly 20 meters of flat terrain whilst blasting lasers in the air in random arcs whilst cackling mechanically. I bid you good day"

Hedders

24,460 posts

276 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
article said:
Upon the EATR platform, the Pentagon could build all sorts of things — a transport, an ambulance, a communications center, even a mobile gunship.
I like the way they suggest that the last thing on their minds is to turn it into another weapon, even though it is a military robot.

"Yea, we are developing this robot that will survive by eating dead bodies on the battlefield. It's job? Oh it will be a gardening bot, or somethning else the military might find handy"

Jasandjules

72,580 posts

258 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Hmm, is there anything in the Geneva convention about not eating dead combatents? Not to mention any civilian casualties....

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

227 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Don't worry chaps, by the time it's troughed it's way through Disney land's visitors we'll all be long dead.

TurboMills

281 posts

209 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
[quote=Steam-Punk-O-Tron-3000/quote]

Soldiers...

I've st 'em.

Jimbeaux

Original Poster:

33,791 posts

260 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
TurboMills said:
Steam-Punk-O-Tron-3000/quote said:
Soldiers...

I've st 'em.
hehe

Rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Why is it that I read stuff from Fox with the same attitude I do when I read the Sunday Sport hehe

That said an interesting concept and superficially a great idea, yet like communism it is totally flawed in reality in terms of it’s acceptability and practical implementation.

Putting morals aside for a minute I wonder what happens it is runs out of plants and dead bodies to use, being military based perhaps it can then create a fresh source of dead bodies…

Don1

16,771 posts

237 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
article said:
Upon the EATR platform, the Pentagon could build all sorts of things — a transport, an ambulance, a communications center, even a mobile gunship.
This may just me a cynic, but something tells me the 'ambulance' part of that equation might be problematic.

"What do you mean the still-living person conveniantly died in transit? That's the sixth one today!"

Romanymagic

3,298 posts

248 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
It's the beginning of the end I tell ye! before you know it cash machines will be nipping at our fingers as we take money out. Skynet is coming...arrggghhhh!

ShadownINja

79,999 posts

311 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
sneijder said:
Did I miss the news ? Did Skynet go live ?
This sprung to mind.

Rude-boy

22,227 posts

262 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Don1 said:
"What do you mean the still-living person conveniently died in transit? That's the sixth one today!"
“Hey look they only had a 16.8% chance of surviving the next 20 minutes where as I had a 98% chance of running out of go juice in that time, I had to make the call…”

crofty1984

17,064 posts

233 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Actually, before reading the article properly my first thought was "so what? you caould run a stem train on dead bodies if you wanted to."

Tony*T3

20,911 posts

276 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
crofty1984 said:
Actually, before reading the article properly my first thought was "so what? you caould run a stem train on dead bodies if you wanted to."
A "stem train"?

I thought they banned Stem cell research....???

smile


TUS 373

5,148 posts

310 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Hard to answer this question, but does this make this robot "environmentally friendly" or not???

crofty1984

17,064 posts

233 months

Thursday 16th July 2009
quotequote all
Tony*T3 said:
crofty1984 said:
Actually, before reading the article properly my first thought was "so what? you caould run a stem train on dead bodies if you wanted to."
A "stem train"?

I thought they banned Stem cell research....???

smile
I was describing "in my own words" a thought I had.
Wibble flimby floowoo stem stem augenite to you an' all mate!