Its not easy being green.
Its not easy being green.
Author
Discussion

Plotloss

Original Poster:

67,280 posts

293 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
Noticed yesterday in SatanCo.

Kenco coffee.

200g jar - £4.92
200g eco refill bag - £4.95

Now obviously the process is different but surely the cost of the jar is enough to offset the savings.

Anyway.

This led me to a line of odd thought, that I am now going to inflict on you.

If being environmentally friendly was neutral/cheaper to the consumer then I'd guess we'd see wholesale uptake in all sorts of things, green electricity, kenco refill bags etc etc.

But oddly I cant think of a single thing that is badged as environmentally friendly and cheaper/cost neutral.

Its like the modern version of self flagellation in the name of a big green eco god.

Perhaps obvious but there we are.

M3CHA-MONK3Y

6,095 posts

218 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all


Slightly disappointed wink

bigandclever

14,215 posts

261 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
Tap water.

mechsympathy

57,287 posts

278 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Its like the modern version of self flagellation in the name of a big green eco god.
Bingo. Would sir like this hair* shirt to match the guilt trip?


*Although these days it'll be hemp.

HRG.

72,863 posts

262 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
Ah yes, when they sit comparable products next to each other and price one in pence per 100g and the other in £/kg to fool the mental-arithmetically challenged punter.

HectorOldbranch

1,029 posts

289 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
mechsympathy said:
Plotloss said:
Its like the modern version of self flagellation in the name of a big green eco god.
Bingo. Would sir like this hair* shirt to match the guilt trip?


*Although these days it'll be hemp.
Prezactly !

My old man used to refer to such people people having a 'hair shirt complex' .. I think it sums up the green movement quite well

off_again

13,917 posts

257 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
Green products and services are merely there to allow for an increase in the margins of the operating companies in the first place. They have played around with the size of food packets, portions and overall quality to such a degree we are somewhat reluctant to accept yet another change.

But if they can get away with making their product 'green' they can make it smaller, use less artificial components and ingredients and then still charge more. Its a stunningly brilliant business model and one that cannot be questioned - to do means you are the anti-Christ. Fantastic, I just wonder why I didn't invent it!

Its just one big con.

If you really want to go 'green' try consuming less, though there is no profit in that so its never going to happen.

drivin_me_nuts

17,949 posts

234 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
.. it could be argued that the overall intention is positive yet it seems to be endorsed and supported by so many who seem to want nothing better than point their 'green credentials' at you as if in some way they are superior.

Perhaps we can point them all in the direction of the American car thread. It's like a time loop in there...Few men enter.. no man leaves.

sleep envy

62,260 posts

272 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
But oddly I cant think of a single thing that is badged as environmentally friendly and cheaper/cost neutral.
CVM tells me that concentrated fabric conditioner works out cheaper and is enironmentally mre responsible than the normal stuff - less embodied energy due to packaging, delivery, etc

Cara Van Man

29,977 posts

274 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
Plotloss said:
But oddly I cant think of a single thing that is badged as environmentally friendly and cheaper/cost neutral.
CVM tells me that concentrated fabric conditioner works out cheaper and is enironmentally mre responsible than the normal stuff - less embodied energy due to packaging, delivery, etc
grumpy

Plotloss

Original Poster:

67,280 posts

293 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
off_again said:
If you really want to go 'green' try consuming less, though there is no profit in that so its never going to happen.
I dont particular want to hug a bunny, well certainly not if it costs more, especially when its bloody obvious its a margin maker rather than truly green.

Much like public transport really, if the train to London was £5 rather than £11 I suspect more people might use it.

Cara Van Man

29,977 posts

274 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
Plotloss said:
Much like public transport really, if the train to London was £5 rather than £11 I suspect more people might use it.
Indeed.

Why would I want to go on a train/bus/rickshaw if it is cheaper and more convenient to do the journey by car (including petrol and parking)?

sleep envy

62,260 posts

272 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
there's varying shades of green though

true eco-warrior hemp toilet tissue type consumables down to the sustainable products which cost the same as the non-sustainable type

TBH I pick and mix down to what suits me better as I prefer to eat the bunnies rather than hug them

Plotloss

Original Poster:

67,280 posts

293 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
Cara Van Man said:
Plotloss said:
Much like public transport really, if the train to London was £5 rather than £11 I suspect more people might use it.
Indeed.

Why would I want to go on a train/bus/rickshaw if it is cheaper and more convenient to do the journey by car (including petrol and parking)?
£3.30 from Slough to Windsor on the bus.

Cheaper by Phantom.

Cara Van Man

29,977 posts

274 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
I crap into the brown recycling bin once a week, does that count?

sleep envy

62,260 posts

272 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
Cara Van Man said:
I crap into the brown recycling bin once a week, does that count?
depends what you're recycling your turds for

Cara Van Man

29,977 posts

274 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
sleep envy said:
Cara Van Man said:
I crap into the brown recycling bin once a week, does that count?
depends what you're recycling your turds for
Breeze blocks. to build an environmentally friendly garage.

Should be done in about a week.

off_again

13,917 posts

257 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
Cara Van Man said:
Why would I want to go on a train/bus/rickshaw if it is cheaper and more convenient to do the journey by car (including petrol and parking)?
Unfortunately that's the rallying cry of the tax-fans. They indicate that its still too cheap to use a car and therefore we need to add further costs, tax and complications before we can truly do something.

I don't subscribe to this way of thinking - I am more of a carrot rather than stick kinda man.

Make public transport fair, reasonable, fast and efficient - oh and cheap - and people might actually use it. Have eco products that are cheaper than the competitors (due to tax, production costs or even financial rebates, I dont care) and low and behold we start to move towards a more sustainable future. Of course, given the high cost of public transport there is only one future.....

Oh, and didn't mean to come across as being a bit aggressive - more of a rhetorical 'you' rather than actually you if you see what I mean.

sleep envy

62,260 posts

272 months

Tuesday 28th July 2009
quotequote all
off_again said:
Make public transport fair, reasonable, fast and efficient - oh and cheap - and people might actually use it.
that's the thing - they can't

therefore to make it competitive in comparison to driving they wallop the motorist

nick - sounds like a load of st to me (although I have read about dwellings constructed from manure in developing countries)