TR-3B - Fact or Science Fiction

TR-3B - Fact or Science Fiction

Author
Discussion

RegMolehusband

Original Poster:

4,055 posts

272 months

Wednesday 5th August 2009
quotequote all
It is rumoured that the Americans have nuclear powered aircraft incorporating anti-gravity technology. They are 600ft across and can hover almost silently, travel at Mach 9 vertically or horizontally, and accelerate at 40G, but the occupants only feel 4.2G.

Is this rumour.....
a) True?
b) Started by a geek in his bedroom?
c) Started by the US government to account for the growing number of triangular UFO observations?

http://www.darkgovernment.com/tr3b.html

and Google TR-3B

I hope this isn't on the same level as the Ambiwlans/Ambulance thread and it's commonly known to be a hoax.

Edited by RegMolehusband on Wednesday 5th August 21:36

strudel

5,889 posts

242 months

Wednesday 5th August 2009
quotequote all
By the description I'd say it's absolute tosh!

RegMolehusband

Original Poster:

4,055 posts

272 months

Wednesday 5th August 2009
quotequote all
So would I

Eric Mc

123,930 posts

280 months

Wednesday 5th August 2009
quotequote all
Rubbish.

RegMolehusband

Original Poster:

4,055 posts

272 months

Wednesday 5th August 2009
quotequote all
Good, so the trianglular craft are not "ours" i.e. humankind smile

On the other hand I've just found an interesting YouTube video posted just last month.......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m86u0cf6Xb8

strudel

5,889 posts

242 months

Wednesday 5th August 2009
quotequote all
RegMolehusband said:
Good, so the trianglular craft are not "ours" i.e. humankind smile

On the other hand I've just found an interesting YouTube video posted just last month.......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m86u0cf6Xb8
This is funny. Who believes this bks?

RegMolehusband

Original Poster:

4,055 posts

272 months

Wednesday 5th August 2009
quotequote all
I do (for one) - not the US version but the ET version.

There's just too much smoke for there not to be a fire.

Edited by RegMolehusband on Wednesday 5th August 22:09

ridds

8,331 posts

259 months

Wednesday 5th August 2009
quotequote all
Am I being thick here.

silly article said:
At Groom Lake their have been whispered rumours of a new element that acts as a catalyst to the plasma. With the vehicle mass reduced by 89%, the craft can travel at Mach 9, vertically or horizontally. My sources say the performance is limited only the stresses that the human pilots can endure. Which is a lot, really, considering along with the 89% reduction in mass, the G forces are also reduced by 89%.
I thought "G" force was due to acceleration of a mass? Reducing mass of the "plane" by 89% will, if anything, increase the rate at which it can accelerate and therefore increase potential G-force felt by the pilot whose mass hasn't changed..... or am I missing something? laugh

Edited by ridds on Wednesday 5th August 22:29

strudel

5,889 posts

242 months

Wednesday 5th August 2009
quotequote all
How can you dispute that lovely science logic.

MiniMan64

18,260 posts

205 months

Wednesday 5th August 2009
quotequote all
That website is a treasure trove of hilarity.

RegMolehusband

Original Poster:

4,055 posts

272 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Out of interest, this is a recent sighting over Mexico, not of the triangles this time......... Stick with it all the way through.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8bptMpkkjc

Edited by RegMolehusband on Thursday 6th August 07:48

TheEnd

15,370 posts

203 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all


silly article said:
At Groom Lake their have been whispered rumours of a new element that acts as a catalyst to the plasma. With the vehicle mass reduced by 89%, the craft can travel at Mach 9, vertically or horizontally. My sources say the performance is limited only the stresses that the human pilots can endure. Which is a lot, really, considering along with the 89% reduction in mass, the G forces are also reduced by 89%.
New element? thats like saying a new colour, the periodic table describes and will even predict what elements that don't exist will be like.

catalyst to plasma? plasma is a state of matter, that's like saying a catalyst to solids.

and the 89% reduction in mass.. reduction from what? they built a real heavy one before and realised that lead wasn't a great material for the airframe?

the g-force stuff is also rubbish.

The fact of the matter is anything like antigravity will be discovered and used in nuclear physics labs many years before the military will get their hands on it.
It'll make the front page of New Scientist, and spend 20 years levitating single atoms before they figure out what to do with it.

Pigeon

18,535 posts

261 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
ridds said:
Am I being thick here.

silly article said:
At Groom Lake their have been whispered rumours of a new element that acts as a catalyst to the plasma. With the vehicle mass reduced by 89%, the craft can travel at Mach 9, vertically or horizontally. My sources say the performance is limited only the stresses that the human pilots can endure. Which is a lot, really, considering along with the 89% reduction in mass, the G forces are also reduced by 89%.
I thought "G" force was due to acceleration of a mass? Reducing mass of the "plane" by 89% will, if anything, increase the rate at which it can accelerate and therefore increase potential G-force felt by the pilot whose mass hasn't changed..... or am I missing something? laugh
That paragraph is written from the same science textbook that Fuel Cat uses, it's such a comedy of errors and plain straightforward utter bks that it's hard to know where to start taking it apart.

dudleybloke

20,553 posts

201 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
sounds like their using star treks inertial dampers! smile

Semi hemi

1,801 posts

213 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
RegMolehusband said:
Here sceptics tongue out - explain this!
Readily available high quality recreational pharmaceuticals, HTH

RegMolehusband

Original Poster:

4,055 posts

272 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Bum - I'd edited that bit out!

Eric Mc

123,930 posts

280 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
It would be hard to hide a 600ft wide aircraft - that is Hindenburg sized.

dr_gn

16,565 posts

199 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Considering just for a moment what technology is commonly available to the general public, what do you think went on at "Area 51" ? do you really think the American govermnent pured billions of dollars into r&d for nothing?

It's fashionable among the internet 'experts' to make fun of these wild claims, and admittedly the science probably gets lost in translation along the way, but I would think *very* carefully before dismissing these concepts as complete rubbish.

RegMolehusband

Original Poster:

4,055 posts

272 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Following a detailed description my best mate gave of his sighting of one of the smaller triangular craft a few years ago my interest has grown and 15 minutes research via YouTube and Google will show you that these triangular craft are commonplace and increasing.

They are either advanced Earth-based technology as suggested in my OP - or something else........

Edited by RegMolehusband on Thursday 6th August 09:07

Mr Will

13,719 posts

221 months

Thursday 6th August 2009
quotequote all
Although that website is pseudo-scientific bks, I am quite prepared to believe that the US military has a secret high altitude, high speed reconnaissance aircraft hidden away somewhere.

But not one using stolen alien anti-gravity technology.