Not car related but knobs nonetheless...
Not car related but knobs nonetheless...
Author
Discussion

ViperScot

Original Poster:

10,087 posts

259 months

Friday 14th August 2009
quotequote all

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/south_of_scotl...

But they do a wonderful job under difficult conditions... rolleyes

Great Pretender

26,140 posts

236 months

Friday 14th August 2009
quotequote all
...And these people are supposed to protect us?

FFS they need protecting from themselves!

Tonto

2,983 posts

270 months

Friday 14th August 2009
quotequote all
It reminds me of the Simpsons episode when Chief Wiggum walks up to someones house, batters the door in and then presses the door bell!

offshorematt2

867 posts

238 months

Saturday 15th August 2009
quotequote all
Knobs? Why? They made a mistake. Would you rather they didn't raid houses for drugs?

They've admitted liability, are paying for the damage and making an apology. You may not the biggest fan of the cops but this seems like a genuine mistake. Or am I missing something?

ViperScot

Original Poster:

10,087 posts

259 months

Saturday 15th August 2009
quotequote all
offshorematt2 said:
Knobs? Why? They made a mistake. Would you rather they didn't raid houses for drugs?

They've admitted liability, are paying for the damage and making an apology. You may not the biggest fan of the cops but this seems like a genuine mistake. Or am I missing something?
Yes, knobs! Fairly big mistake and how could they not apologise? How can you get that wrong, especially when someone had already told them they had the wrong address beforehand?! Typical polis arrogance.

Edited by ViperScot on Saturday 15th August 14:31

CO2000

3,177 posts

231 months

Saturday 15th August 2009
quotequote all
offshorematt2 said:
are paying for the damage
Hmmmm, who's paying them for them paying the old lady....

Great Pretender

26,140 posts

236 months

Saturday 15th August 2009
quotequote all
CO2000 said:
offshorematt2 said:
are paying for the damage
Hmmmm, who's paying them for them paying the old lady....
Precisely.

fluffnik

20,156 posts

249 months

Saturday 15th August 2009
quotequote all
offshorematt2 said:
Would you rather they didn't raid houses for drugs?
Yes.

Far better to collect VAT than pay for the Drug Squad...

offshorematt2

867 posts

238 months

Sunday 16th August 2009
quotequote all
ViperScot said:
offshorematt2 said:
Knobs? Why? They made a mistake. Would you rather they didn't raid houses for drugs?

They've admitted liability, are paying for the damage and making an apology. You may not the biggest fan of the cops but this seems like a genuine mistake. Or am I missing something?
Yes, knobs! Fairly big mistake and how could they not apologise? How can you get that wrong, especially when someone had already told them they had the wrong address beforehand?! Typical polis arrogance.

Edited by ViperScot on Saturday 15th August 14:31
Fine. So next time they're raiding some suspected crack house, they should call it off if someone on the stairs said it was just a little old lady living there? Get a grip. Where's the arrogance?

The arguement on whether the taxman covers the cost is pretty irrelevant - I don't see posts adding up the positives when the police do their job successfully? The police, whether right or wrong, are paid for out of our pocket. Hopefully you never need to call on them, I guess. Two terms of Labour really have turned everyone against the cops, hasn't it. If you want to blame someone for the police's target-driven behaviour of the last decade look at your elected government - not your unelected front line copper.


Edited by offshorematt2 on Sunday 16th August 01:22

ViperScot

Original Poster:

10,087 posts

259 months

Sunday 16th August 2009
quotequote all
offshorematt2 said:
ViperScot said:
offshorematt2 said:
Knobs? Why? They made a mistake. Would you rather they didn't raid houses for drugs?

They've admitted liability, are paying for the damage and making an apology. You may not the biggest fan of the cops but this seems like a genuine mistake. Or am I missing something?
Yes, knobs! Fairly big mistake and how could they not apologise? How can you get that wrong, especially when someone had already told them they had the wrong address beforehand?! Typical polis arrogance.

Edited by ViperScot on Saturday 15th August 14:31
Fine. So next time they're raiding some suspected crack house, they should call it off if someone on the stairs said it was just a little old lady living there? Get a grip. Where's the arrogance?

The arguement on whether the taxman covers the cost is pretty irrelevant - I don't see posts adding up the positives when the police do their job successfully? The police, whether right or wrong, are paid for out of our pocket. Hopefully you never need to call on them, I guess. Two terms of Labour really have turned everyone against the cops, hasn't it. If you want to blame someone for the police's target-driven behaviour of the last decade look at your elected government - not your unelected front line copper.


Edited by offshorematt2 on Sunday 16th August 01:22
The arrogance of being told they were wrong beforehand and not thinking they needed to check up their 'intelligence', especially given it was an old lady in the house.

But if you want to take the argument down Conjecture Avenue, I don't believe they should be doing drug raids at all as I think all drugs should be decriminalised, even legalised. It would save our country an awful lot of money and take so much crime off the streets. Given your apparent love of the polis, I think I can guess your views on that...

offshorematt2

867 posts

238 months

Sunday 16th August 2009
quotequote all
ViperScot said:
offshorematt2 said:
ViperScot said:
offshorematt2 said:
Knobs? Why? They made a mistake. Would you rather they didn't raid houses for drugs?

They've admitted liability, are paying for the damage and making an apology. You may not the biggest fan of the cops but this seems like a genuine mistake. Or am I missing something?
Yes, knobs! Fairly big mistake and how could they not apologise? How can you get that wrong, especially when someone had already told them they had the wrong address beforehand?! Typical polis arrogance.

Edited by ViperScot on Saturday 15th August 14:31
Fine. So next time they're raiding some suspected crack house, they should call it off if someone on the stairs said it was just a little old lady living there? Get a grip. Where's the arrogance?

The arguement on whether the taxman covers the cost is pretty irrelevant - I don't see posts adding up the positives when the police do their job successfully? The police, whether right or wrong, are paid for out of our pocket. Hopefully you never need to call on them, I guess. Two terms of Labour really have turned everyone against the cops, hasn't it. If you want to blame someone for the police's target-driven behaviour of the last decade look at your elected government - not your unelected front line copper.


Edited by offshorematt2 on Sunday 16th August 01:22
The arrogance of being told they were wrong beforehand and not thinking they needed to check up their 'intelligence', especially given it was an old lady in the house.

But if you want to take the argument down Conjecture Avenue, I don't believe they should be doing drug raids at all as I think all drugs should be decriminalised, even legalised. It would save our country an awful lot of money and take so much crime off the streets. Given your apparent love of the polis, I think I can guess your views on that...
If you read my posts, I don't think I have demonstrated any 'love of the polis'? I just don't agree that making a mistake then apologising makes the cops arrogant knobs.

You may be surprised by my views on decriminalisation but then that would be discussing government policy, not the police. There is no relevance here.

Anyway, lets agree to differ on this one. I don't think we're going to change each others minds.

ViperScot

Original Poster:

10,087 posts

259 months

Sunday 16th August 2009
quotequote all
offshorematt2 said:
ViperScot said:
offshorematt2 said:
ViperScot said:
offshorematt2 said:
Knobs? Why? They made a mistake. Would you rather they didn't raid houses for drugs?

They've admitted liability, are paying for the damage and making an apology. You may not the biggest fan of the cops but this seems like a genuine mistake. Or am I missing something?
Yes, knobs! Fairly big mistake and how could they not apologise? How can you get that wrong, especially when someone had already told them they had the wrong address beforehand?! Typical polis arrogance.

Edited by ViperScot on Saturday 15th August 14:31
Fine. So next time they're raiding some suspected crack house, they should call it off if someone on the stairs said it was just a little old lady living there? Get a grip. Where's the arrogance?

The arguement on whether the taxman covers the cost is pretty irrelevant - I don't see posts adding up the positives when the police do their job successfully? The police, whether right or wrong, are paid for out of our pocket. Hopefully you never need to call on them, I guess. Two terms of Labour really have turned everyone against the cops, hasn't it. If you want to blame someone for the police's target-driven behaviour of the last decade look at your elected government - not your unelected front line copper.


Edited by offshorematt2 on Sunday 16th August 01:22
The arrogance of being told they were wrong beforehand and not thinking they needed to check up their 'intelligence', especially given it was an old lady in the house.

But if you want to take the argument down Conjecture Avenue, I don't believe they should be doing drug raids at all as I think all drugs should be decriminalised, even legalised. It would save our country an awful lot of money and take so much crime off the streets. Given your apparent love of the polis, I think I can guess your views on that...
If you read my posts, I don't think I have demonstrated any 'love of the polis'? I just don't agree that making a mistake then apologising makes the cops arrogant knobs.

You may be surprised by my views on decriminalisation but then that would be discussing government policy, not the police. There is no relevance here.

Anyway, lets agree to differ on this one. I don't think we're going to change each others minds.
My point is that they had the option to avoid going to the wrong house based on advice they received but chose to ignore it. That makes them arrogant knobs in my book. That info should at least have given then sufficient doubt in their 'intelligence' to go and double check quickly...

Semi hemi

1,801 posts

220 months

Sunday 16th August 2009
quotequote all
The other thing to consider is that the police were acting on "intelligence" I presume, but surely a bit of surveillance prior to busting down the door would have helped

This actually happened to a girl I used to out with. Police broke down her door (acting on info received) while she was at work turned the place upside down lifted carpets & floorboards, Aye they put them back down again. trapping her cat under them. 4 days before cat was found.

They had the wrong address, should have been in the next block of flats.

Chief Cunstubble at the time Ian Oliver, the arrogant tossbag refused to give an apology saying "unfortunately it was the price decent people had pay in the fight against drugs2...


ViperScot

Original Poster:

10,087 posts

259 months

Monday 17th August 2009
quotequote all
The fight against drugs would be such a total joke if it didn't cost US so much money. The older I get, the more distrusting I get about those charged to 'protect and serve' us (they always seem to forget that motto). Maybe it's cynicism or maybe it's just that the experience of age has enlightened me as to reality...

Corpulent Tosser

5,468 posts

267 months

Monday 17th August 2009
quotequote all
ViperScot said:
offshorematt2 said:
ViperScot said:
offshorematt2 said:
ViperScot said:
offshorematt2 said:
Knobs? Why? They made a mistake. Would you rather they didn't raid houses for drugs?

They've admitted liability, are paying for the damage and making an apology. You may not the biggest fan of the cops but this seems like a genuine mistake. Or am I missing something?
Yes, knobs! Fairly big mistake and how could they not apologise? How can you get that wrong, especially when someone had already told them they had the wrong address beforehand?! Typical polis arrogance.

Edited by ViperScot on Saturday 15th August 14:31
Fine. So next time they're raiding some suspected crack house, they should call it off if someone on the stairs said it was just a little old lady living there? Get a grip. Where's the arrogance?

The arguement on whether the taxman covers the cost is pretty irrelevant - I don't see posts adding up the positives when the police do their job successfully? The police, whether right or wrong, are paid for out of our pocket. Hopefully you never need to call on them, I guess. Two terms of Labour really have turned everyone against the cops, hasn't it. If you want to blame someone for the police's target-driven behaviour of the last decade look at your elected government - not your unelected front line copper.


Edited by offshorematt2 on Sunday 16th August 01:22
The arrogance of being told they were wrong beforehand and not thinking they needed to check up their 'intelligence', especially given it was an old lady in the house.

But if you want to take the argument down Conjecture Avenue, I don't believe they should be doing drug raids at all as I think all drugs should be decriminalised, even legalised. It would save our country an awful lot of money and take so much crime off the streets. Given your apparent love of the polis, I think I can guess your views on that...
If you read my posts, I don't think I have demonstrated any 'love of the polis'? I just don't agree that making a mistake then apologising makes the cops arrogant knobs.

You may be surprised by my views on decriminalisation but then that would be discussing government policy, not the police. There is no relevance here.

Anyway, lets agree to differ on this one. I don't think we're going to change each others minds.
My point is that they had the option to avoid going to the wrong house based on advice they received but chose to ignore it. That makes them arrogant knobs in my book. That info should at least have given then sufficient doubt in their 'intelligence' to go and double check quickly...
By which time the drugs could have been flushed down the toilet, or spirited away from the house.

Sounds to me like they made a genuine mistake.

fluffnik

20,156 posts

249 months

Monday 17th August 2009
quotequote all
Corpulent Tosser said:
By which time the drugs could have been flushed down the toilet, or spirited away from the house.
So fcensoreding what?

The War On Drugs! is nothing but a waste of our money.

jerwatt

25,097 posts

223 months

Monday 17th August 2009
quotequote all
Complain to the government then, it's not the police's choice to make up our drugs policy as outlined before. They have to enforce what the government makes up.

In this case it's obviously a mistake, it's not like they want these headlines. And as for the person saying it's an old lady then they're not going to believe someone who's there - could be someone as part of the drugs ring trying to throw them off - headline "Police miss drug dealers after believing person on stairs" isn't going to be great either! Fair enough, maybe get someone to stake out the house just before to make sure - but then with police numbers being screwed up by the government is there any spare?!?

And as an aside, have none of us made cock ups in our jobs? Fair enough, with things like this they should be extra careful, but everyone makes mistakes.

Corpulent Tosser

5,468 posts

267 months

Monday 17th August 2009
quotequote all
fluffnik said:
Corpulent Tosser said:
By which time the drugs could have been flushed down the toilet, or spirited away from the house.
So fcensoreding what?

The War On Drugs! is nothing but a waste of our money.
That is your opinion and of course you are entitled to it, I too am entitled to my opinion and that is that dealers of illegal drugs should be hunted down, prosecuted and imprisoned.

If the law is changed and those drugs become legal and the people selling them are paying tax etc then of course their status changes but until then they are criminals and should be treated as such.

ViperScot

Original Poster:

10,087 posts

259 months

Monday 17th August 2009
quotequote all
jerwatt said:
Complain to the government then, it's not the police's choice to make up our drugs policy as outlined before. They have to enforce what the government makes up.

In this case it's obviously a mistake, it's not like they want these headlines. And as for the person saying it's an old lady then they're not going to believe someone who's there - could be someone as part of the drugs ring trying to throw them off - headline "Police miss drug dealers after believing person on stairs" isn't going to be great either! Fair enough, maybe get someone to stake out the house just before to make sure - but then with police numbers being screwed up by the government is there any spare?!?

And as an aside, have none of us made cock ups in our jobs? Fair enough, with things like this they should be extra careful, but everyone makes mistakes.
There would have been no need to take someone else's info about who was in the house on face value. Just a simple further check to make sure they had the right place. It would have taken a minute. But no, they go in gung-ho. Knowing some folk in Northern and Grampian drugs squads, I'd be worried to let them walk the street unaided. The police (and, indeed, our legal system) are, by and large, a joke.

OlberJ

14,101 posts

255 months

Monday 17th August 2009
quotequote all
Corpulent Tosser said:
That is your opinion and of course you are entitled to it, I too am entitled to my opinion and that is that dealers of illegal drugs should be hunted down, prosecuted and imprisoned.

If the law is changed and those drugs become legal and the people selling them are paying tax etc then of course their status changes but until then they are criminals and should be treated as such.
Eeeep. Does that mean you're fine with folk selling drugs as long as it's legal and we can tax them on it?