Age + Sexual discrimination
Age + Sexual discrimination
Author
Discussion

forever_driving

Original Poster:

1,869 posts

273 months

Friday 26th December 2003
quotequote all
I finally picked up a copy of the Road Craft (The police driver's handbook) earlier today after reading the topic in the general gassing forum.

I was reading the first chapter and some comments were made regarding the fact that young drivers and male drivers were at higher risk of causing an accident.

Now this suddenly reminded me of all the problems when I'm trying to get insurance... I'm male and I'm young (in relation to the type of cars I drive).

Anyway, surely with all the leftism that's going on at the moment, I have a case for sexual discrimination and sexism by my insurance company.

Have their been any court rulings on this type of subject in recent history?

theLemming

4,319 posts

288 months

Friday 26th December 2003
quotequote all
Ageism IIRC isnt illegal. There was however a ruling (which i believe is mired in the legal process) that it will be illegal to charge more for car insurance on the basis of sex.

Will try and find a link later.

Derek Smith

48,812 posts

271 months

Friday 26th December 2003
quotequote all
It is young, male drivers who make the most claims. I see no reason why I, and those my age and sex, should pay for young males inability to control their hormones. The fact is that you are much, much more likely to have an accident, and one where there is considerable damage, if you are male and young. The least likely to have an accident per mile driven is the middle aged male - that's me. I don't want my premiums to reflect youngsters' inability to see a hazard until it's in the middle of their bonnet.

forever_driving

Original Poster:

1,869 posts

273 months

Friday 26th December 2003
quotequote all
You see here's the problem.

I'm a perfectly safe driver, I've been on the road for 10 years (+ in various forms of racing for 19 years ) and I've never been in an accident. I just don't like being put in pigeonhole with other young male drivers, why should I suffer?

It's basically the prejudice, sweeping generalisation that insurance companies make that I disagree with. Obvioulsy, the whole system would grind to a halt if insurance companies had to make individual assesments for each of their clients, so I'm really just banging my head against a brickwall.

Anyway, as has been discussed many times on this board before, they're all crooks, just after our money.... oh hold on, I've just made a sweeping generalisation of insurance companies!

haggishead

8,483 posts

275 months

Friday 26th December 2003
quotequote all
Unfortunately, they make an assessment based on their experience of similar candidates. If they know that the probability is higher that a claim will be made, then they have to charge more. These people aren't in business to lose money by paying out more than they take in, so it's inevitable...

There's an incentive to accummulate no-claims discount!

(Note - I am in no way happy either, having just coughed over £1,000 to insure a Metro for a provisional licence... but I do see the reason, looking back on what I was like at 20...)

voyds9

8,490 posts

306 months

Saturday 27th December 2003
quotequote all
haggishead said:
Unfortunately, they make an assessment based on their experience of similar candidates. If they know that the probability is higher that a claim will be made, then they have to charge more. These people aren't in business to lose money by paying out more than they take in, so it's inevitable...

There's an incentive to accummulate no-claims discount!

(Note - I am in no way happy either, having just coughed over £1,000 to insure a Metro for a provisional licence... but I do see the reason, looking back on what I was like at 20...)

I remember the reverse problem on some consumer program, OAP were complaining that travel insurance was higher for them. Of course it was, they are more likely to be ill/die than the average younger person, there was complaint after complaint, but they also thought cheaper car insurance was fair as they were less likely to have an accident.

tim_s

299 posts

277 months

Saturday 27th December 2003
quotequote all
i read that 29-35 year old male company car drivers are actually the highest risk group - has anyone else seen this?

gh0st

4,693 posts

281 months

Saturday 27th December 2003
quotequote all
Well being a 24 year old company car driver I must be fairly safe then

zoomzoomzoom

27 posts

268 months

Sunday 28th December 2003
quotequote all
women only insurance companies are strange - my ex girlfriend was insured with Diamond (women only policy) and yet they were only too happy to add me as a named driver to the policy. Admittedly she was the main driver (it was a Vectra and I like to DRIVE a car) but it's still odd I think.

tvradict

3,829 posts

297 months

Sunday 28th December 2003
quotequote all
But if someone came along and set up a Men only insurance company all hell would break loose.

They would be taken to court and forced to shut down or start insuring women drivers!!