Biomass Energy
Author
Discussion

BoRED S2upid

Original Poster:

21,047 posts

269 months

Wednesday 9th September 2009
quotequote all
Is it me or does this seem all a bit lame?. Billions being invested in making electricity from burining trees! come on people we were living in caves and burning trees to keep alive thousands of years ago and now all we can come up with as the next best thing is burning them again. Poor trees.


rocksteadyeddie

7,971 posts

256 months

Wednesday 9th September 2009
quotequote all
Burning domestic waste - that's what we need to be doing. Take a waste product and create something useful rather than put it in a hole in the ground where it, errr, sits. Mainly rotting. And making methane.

Works in Switzerland who heat whole towns from the resultant heat, and flue-scrubbers take care of all the nasty bi-products.

Is it just me who thinks we are missing a trick?

GTIR

24,741 posts

295 months

Wednesday 9th September 2009
quotequote all
I just got your username.

silly

Biomass. It is Eco friendly as it burns what it's taken out.

Tokar

165 posts

210 months

Wednesday 9th September 2009
quotequote all
Bio - energy, whether it be bioethanol or burning stuff for heating is a lost cause. If you want to remove fossil fuels and so completely eco, the crops needed to sustain it would be more than are currently grown to feed the planet!

phil1979

3,671 posts

244 months

Wednesday 9th September 2009
quotequote all
There are sawmills in Europe that make energy for the entire mill from biomass energy - the waste products from the sawing process. Some mills make more money from selling the excess energy back to the grid as opposed to selling finished timber!

It's not dark-age tech at all. And as for 'poor trees'... they are cutting from plantation stock..

Gedon

3,097 posts

205 months

Wednesday 9th September 2009
quotequote all
Of course, if you look at the sankey diagrams of biomass, there are usually a lot of factors left out.

Biomass is one thing.

Recycling the energy out of something is totally another.

Sadly, fossil fuel conservation is one thing, plant food gas hysteria is another. We should be concentrating on the former, instead, we are hopelessly wasting time with the latter.

RichardD

3,608 posts

274 months

Wednesday 9th September 2009
quotequote all
Could someone check out this persons thoughts please :-

http://www.jackherer.com/chapters.html

He is either a repressed genius or a spaced out hippy. I can't quite decide which hippy

His assertision is that basically hemp is the only plant in the world that can grow prolifically enough to actually be used as a biomass energy source.

V8mate

45,899 posts

218 months

Wednesday 9th September 2009
quotequote all
Tokar said:
Bio - energy, whether it be bioethanol or burning stuff for heating is a lost cause. If you want to remove fossil fuels and so completely eco, the crops needed to sustain it would be more than are currently grown to feed the planet!
But what about the billions of tonnes of food we throw away every year?
Plenty of capability for energy production there!

sleep envy

62,260 posts

278 months

Wednesday 9th September 2009
quotequote all
BoRED S2upid said:
Is it me or does this seem all a bit lame?. Billions being invested in making electricity from burining trees! come on people we were living in caves and burning trees to keep alive thousands of years ago and now all we can come up with as the next best thing is burning them again. Poor trees.
it's not just trees that they burn

many supermarkets are now converting to biomass boilers and are burning the waste they generate

less landfill requirement, less transport needed to move waste, less dependency from the national grid, etc, etc

it's no bad thing

Spiritual_Beggar

4,833 posts

223 months

Wednesday 9th September 2009
quotequote all
Biomass energy.....Finally, a use for all those unemployed, chav, scum, benefit cheats!

Or the MP's. Imagine the energy that could be generated from Prescott alone!!!