Speed of Light
Author
Discussion

dibbers006

Original Poster:

14,640 posts

247 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
The initial message was deleted from this topic on 02 March 2025 at 12:32

BrabusMog

21,774 posts

215 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
I think you'd be arrested first.

james_tigerwoods

16,347 posts

226 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
No.

HTH.

Neil_H

15,418 posts

280 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
dibbers006 said:
If the World is destroyed this second. Presumably by angry Badgers in some sort of Space feud.

... and I go back in 'Time' to last year, ya know... so I can touch some kids and wk in the biscuit isle at Tesco one last time.

Time being relative, it is the fact that light from the 'future' hasn't reached my -one year eyes yet meaning I am in 'the past' correct? But if the destruction of the future throws the Mass of Earth out into Eternity at Speeds faster than light... could the Future destruction start raining down on me in the Past?
You can't go back in time, only forward.

"But if the destruction of the future throws the Mass of Earth out into Eternity at Speeds faster than light... "

It can't be thrown faster than light.

BoRED S2upid

21,047 posts

269 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
Has the OP been eating mushrooms?.

Odie

4,187 posts

211 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
The speed of light at the speed of light is the speed of light. So No

Teppic

8,075 posts

286 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
http://i406.photobucket.com/albums/pp148/Teppic24/...

Edited by Big Al. on Friday 11th September 20:30

Puggit

49,794 posts

277 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
c?

crofty1984

17,064 posts

233 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
Teppic said:
Love that pic.

Edited by Big Al. on Friday 11th September 20:31

him_over_there

970 posts

235 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
dibbers006 said:
If the World is destroyed this second. Presumably by angry Badgers in some sort of Space feud.

... and I go back in 'Time' to last year, ya know... so I can touch some kids and wk in the biscuit isle at Tesco one last time.

Time being relative, it is the fact that light from the 'future' hasn't reached my -one year eyes yet meaning I am in 'the past' correct? But if the destruction of the future throws the Mass of Earth out into Eternity at Speeds faster than light... could the Future destruction start raining down on me in the Past?
In a word, No.

Are you high ?

FreeLitres

6,128 posts

206 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
Just to clarify, the speed of light is the fastest that anything would ever be able to travel. This refers to light photons (packets of energy). Electrons (or any 'object') an only ever get -close- to the speed of light under extreme circumstances. An example would be electrons being forced around a synchrotron particle accelerator.

In a vacuum, the speed of light is approximately 3 x 10^8 m/s. Or 299,792,458 m/s to be exact. If the light travels through air or glass, the speed would reduce.

To the OP - the answer is 335d (mapped).


Ayahuasca

27,580 posts

308 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
Yes. Space/time is a fractal-ellipsoid blanket woven from strings of wormholes, any one of which can be curved, multiplied by an infinity of parallel universes.

So in theory you could be acting all innocent in the biscuit aisle while at the same time doing the nasty with Jenny Agutter dressed in a flimsy nothing in the past/future.

Pic of Ms Agutter, to illustrate my point:


dibbly_dobbler

11,489 posts

226 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
hehe Needed a laugh - job done, thanks gents smile

Justayellowbadge

37,057 posts

271 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey... stuff

GKP

15,099 posts

270 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
You'd need a torch though, surely? Otherwise if the light isn't there yet it'd be dark.

KaraK

13,787 posts

238 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
EP2Nick said:
bloody good q

Force of light is infinite so impossible. Shame though

Edited by EP2Nick on Friday 11th September 12:11
FYI... the speed of light is 299,792,458 metres per second, please note this is NOT the same as infinity

Ozone

3,103 posts

216 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
KaraK said:
EP2Nick said:
bloody good q

Force of light is infinite so impossible. Shame though

Edited by EP2Nick on Friday 11th September 12:11
FYI... the speed of light is 299,792,458 metres per second, please note this is NOT the same as infinity
What is the speed of infinity?

sonic_2k_uk

4,008 posts

236 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
Ozone said:
KaraK said:
EP2Nick said:
bloody good q

Force of light is infinite so impossible. Shame though

Edited by EP2Nick on Friday 11th September 12:11
FYI... the speed of light is 299,792,458 metres per second, please note this is NOT the same as infinity
What is the speed of infinity?

Ozone

3,103 posts

216 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
I've seen a 335d (mapped) go faster than that!! wink

Evangelion

8,637 posts

207 months

Friday 11th September 2009
quotequote all
Justayellowbadge said:
People assume that time is a strict progression of cause to effect, but actually from a non-linear, non-subjective viewpoint, it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, timey-wimey... stuff
That sentence got away from you, didn't it?