The Thin Red Line - WTF?
Author
Discussion

youngsyr

Original Poster:

14,742 posts

209 months

Monday 28th September 2009
quotequote all
Went to see this in the cinema when it first came out, it's the only film I saw people get up and leave (way) before the end.

I think we managed about 2 hours out of the 3 that it ran for and then gave up ourselves, but it was recently on Sky HD so I recorded it and gave it another try.

Whilst I can appreciate the "Artsy" shots and the I guess what is juxtaposition between some of the soldiers former lives and their experiences in the war, as well as the very distinct characters in it, it still seems like self-indulgent nonsense.

'***Plot Spoiler Below***

I'm currenly around 2h 15 min in and all that's happened so far is a company has taken a well defended ridge and pushed on into the forest, taking a camp in the process.

We've briefly seen how two or three of the characters have vastly different views on war, and that's it. Two and a quarter hours for that! I know it's not supposed to be an action film, but it is a war film and yet it took 50 minutes for the first shot to be fired!!

So, can anyone explain why it takes so much time to not really make a point?

Did anyone actually enjoy the film?

TJD2003

447 posts

198 months

Monday 28th September 2009
quotequote all
No

Regards
TJ

Rob_R

2,449 posts

262 months

Monday 28th September 2009
quotequote all
I can usually appreciate a film on its own merits but The Thin Red Line was too little like entertainment and too much like hard work for me.

Toss.

youngsyr

Original Poster:

14,742 posts

209 months

Monday 28th September 2009
quotequote all
Did some digging around and the intentions of the novel the film is based on may shed some light on the film:

Wiki said:
The Thin Red Line is author James Jones's fictional account of the World War II Galloping Horse portion of the Battle of Mount Austen, specifically Hill 53, during the Guadalcanal campaign, which he experienced firsthand in the United States Army's 25th Infantry Division. The novel has been adapted for motion pictures twice, first in 1964 and then in Terrence Malick's 1998 adaptation.

The inscription page catches one element of the book and of Jones' approach:

This book is cheerfully dedicated to those greatest and most heroic of all human endeavors, WAR and WARFARE; may they never cease to give us the pleasure, excitement and adrenal stimulation that we need, or provide us with the heroes, the presidents and the leaders, the monuments and museums which we erect to them in the name of PEACE.

Like Jones's two other World War II novels, the story focuses on a number of characters and their differing reactions to combat; the central characters are actually the same in all three books but their names have necessarily been changed, since Pvt. Witt's counterpart in From Here to Eternity (Prewitt) died at its conclusion. While none of the characters are particularly attractive or warm, Jones effectively conveys the alienation and horror that characterized the Pacific theatre of war for the American rifleman.

Instead of a conventional military adventure story, the author presents a more realistic depiction of battle where ordinary people experience a mix of murder, fear, homosexuality, dread, helplessness, frustration, meanness, terror, and emptiness. The novel depicts, but is careful not to judge, acts most readers would consider repellent, such as disinterring a Japanese corpse for fun, summarily executing Japanese prisoners or extracting gold teeth from corpses. These acts are shown as natural reactions to the soldiers' environment.

The novel explores the idea that, despite the mass use of humanity, modern war is a very personal and ultimately lonely experience in which each soldier suffers the emotional horrors of war by himself.
I still don't really understand why it takes 3 hours to get that message across though? confused

T89 Callan

8,422 posts

210 months

Monday 28th September 2009
quotequote all
I tried to watch it shaortly after it came out on DVD, bored me and my mate senseless, turned off after 1:45.

Haven't bothered to try and watch it again.