Apollo landing site photos...
Apollo landing site photos...
Author
Discussion

mattikake

Original Poster:

5,116 posts

228 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
Can someone explain to me why the shadow is the wrong side of the lander?

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/l...

B17NNS

18,506 posts

276 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
Because the pictures were shot in a hangar in the Arizona desert.

Dibble

13,276 posts

269 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
It's the right side - the shadows coming the "other way" from the craters are right if you look at them - the light is from the left, the shadows are inside the lips of the craters, not the shadows caused by the craters themselves (if that makes sense).

Los Palmas 7

29,908 posts

259 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
Here we go again.

Steamer

14,180 posts

242 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
are you sure thats not a hole that its parked next to? not a boulder. A boulder would cast a shadow - a hole would have a shadow running into it.

ETA: What Dibble just said! biggrin

Edited by Steamer on Thursday 1st October 14:57

ewenm

28,506 posts

274 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
Dibble said:
It's the right side - the shadows coming the "other way" from the craters are right if you look at them - the light is from the left, the shadows are inside the lips of the craters, not the shadows caused by the craters themselves (if that makes sense).
yes End of thread.

mattikake

Original Poster:

5,116 posts

228 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
Oh yes of course, those aren't mounds, they're craters! And the less pronouced shadows are also dips in the surface, not rises. Hard to tell without my binocular vision! lol

Durr!

Dibble

13,276 posts

269 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
Woohoo. I've won an internet argument!

Mrs Dibble

4 posts

215 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
Dibble said:
Woohoo. I've won an internet argument!
No you haven't. Idiot. Shut up.

mattikake

Original Poster:

5,116 posts

228 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
Argument? I was only asking for an explanation that I was clearly lacking.

Like looking up at one of those perforated ceilings in old cars - loads of little dots. Sometimes you just can't focus on it for a few moments and see it as it really is, yet the guy sat next to you has no problems at all.

It were a supposed fake, you'd think they'd make sure the shadows were correct. It would be pretty hard not to notice whilst you were doctoring the pics! lol

Edited by mattikake on Thursday 1st October 15:24

Liszt

4,337 posts

299 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
Mrs Dibble said:
Dibble said:
Woohoo. I've won an internet argument!
No you haven't. Idiot. Shut up.
Brilliant! 4 posts and one of those is to tell Dibble he's an idiot.

mackie1

8,169 posts

262 months

Thursday 1st October 2009
quotequote all
What's your stance on aeroplanes on conveyor belts?