Regarding Gordon Brown; Who's conspiriacy theory was this?
Regarding Gordon Brown; Who's conspiriacy theory was this?
Author
Discussion

glazbagun

Original Poster:

14,927 posts

213 months

Saturday 10th October 2009
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8300686.stm

Wasn't it a PHer who mused that he'd bail due to health problems if things were still going bad prior to the election?

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

271 months

Saturday 10th October 2009
quotequote all
Sp...whose


It's been all over the media. Have you been hibernating...? hehe

turbobloke

112,739 posts

276 months

Saturday 10th October 2009
quotequote all
Article said:
Another check-up on Friday found no further change to his sight.
Are they sure? He's staring defeat in the face and still can't see it.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

271 months

Saturday 10th October 2009
quotequote all
hehe

He's just jealous of Blunkett....

AndrewW-G

11,968 posts

233 months

Saturday 10th October 2009
quotequote all
It's been suggested by several people including myself (it originaly surfaced when he vanished"went on holiday" in 2008 and people assumed he'd had a breakdown)
Senior figures within labour will be looking at the strategy surrounding the replacement of winky and working out how to get somebody better in without much fuss. By getting him to go on medical grounds they may even improve in the poles as people will tend to cut them some slack if he admits to ill health.

I've still got money on a pandemic or "civil issue" that will prevent or delay the next election, something that may even surface to prevent further protests or even a refferendum on the EU treaty

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

271 months

Saturday 10th October 2009
quotequote all
How do he suffer this damage anyway....?

Lot of furious winking, I'll be bound....

BruceV8

3,325 posts

263 months

Saturday 10th October 2009
quotequote all
AndrewW-G said:
I've still got money on a pandemic or "civil issue" that will prevent or delay the next election, something that may even surface to prevent further protests or even a refferendum on the EU treaty
I'm no fan of conspiracy theories, but this doesn't seem too far fetched at all. In the long run it would be political suicide for the Labour party though.

AndrewW-G

11,968 posts

233 months

Saturday 10th October 2009
quotequote all
BruceV8 said:
AndrewW-G said:
I've still got money on a pandemic or "civil issue" that will prevent or delay the next election, something that may even surface to prevent further protests or even a refferendum on the EU treaty
I'm no fan of conspiracy theories, but this doesn't seem too far fetched at all. In the long run it would be political suicide for the Labour party though.
Unless the ultimate aim is to transform UK labour into the United European Socialist Labour party, where the UK is essentialy just one small region of a far larger ellectoral base i.e.they'd be happy to sacrifice for example the mp for Essex if it allowed them to win the rest of the country

NismoGT

1,634 posts

206 months

Saturday 10th October 2009
quotequote all

Asterix

24,438 posts

244 months

Saturday 10th October 2009
quotequote all
NismoGT said:
I read that as 'Rectal Tears' and thought that as Blair is back in town...

BruceV8

3,325 posts

263 months

Saturday 10th October 2009
quotequote all
AndrewW-G said:
BruceV8 said:
AndrewW-G said:
I've still got money on a pandemic or "civil issue" that will prevent or delay the next election, something that may even surface to prevent further protests or even a refferendum on the EU treaty
I'm no fan of conspiracy theories, but this doesn't seem too far fetched at all. In the long run it would be political suicide for the Labour party though.
Unless the ultimate aim is to transform UK labour into the United European Socialist Labour party, where the UK is essentialy just one small region of a far larger ellectoral base i.e.they'd be happy to sacrifice for example the mp for Essex if it allowed them to win the rest of the country
Refusing to hold or honour an election and following this with a massive constitutional change (Submission to EU, republic, de facto one party state or whatever) would in effect be a coup d'etat (a self-coup) which, I believe, would be met with a counter coup - not necessarily a military one. When democracy is restored I doubt very much Labour in its present form would figure in it. Thats what I mean by political suicide!

glazbagun

Original Poster:

14,927 posts

213 months

Saturday 10th October 2009
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Sp...whose


It's been all over the media. Have you been hibernating...? hehe
Grrr. I wrote whose... you ever get that thing where you write a word, look at it and arent sure that what you've written is even a word in the first place? laugh

To answer the latter- I havent had a TV for two years and havent stooped to buying a paper in nearly five. I rely on PH for my news updates. biggrin

Edited by glazbagun on Saturday 10th October 15:28

FM

5,816 posts

236 months

Saturday 10th October 2009
quotequote all
BruceV8 said:
AndrewW-G said:
I've still got money on a pandemic or "civil issue" that will prevent or delay the next election, something that may even surface to prevent further protests or even a refferendum on the EU treaty
I'm no fan of conspiracy theories, but this doesn't seem too far fetched at all. In the long run it would be political suicide for the Labour party though.
yes

Silly level 6 pandemic + WHO emergency legislation

Tycho

11,991 posts

289 months

Saturday 10th October 2009
quotequote all
Asterix said:
NismoGT said:
I read that as 'Rectal Tears' and thought that as Blair is back in town...
I thought the same and wondered if Mandleson was up to his usual tricks.... hurl

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

271 months

Sunday 11th October 2009
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
To answer the latter- I havent had a TV for two years and havent stooped to buying a paper in nearly five. I rely on PH for my news updates. biggrin
You won't have heard about the thing that's so horribly bad that PH won't talk about it, then...?


tinman0

18,231 posts

256 months

Sunday 11th October 2009
quotequote all
glazbagun said:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8300686.stm

Wasn't it a PHer who mused that he'd bail due to health problems if things were still going bad prior to the election?
It was surmised in one of the daily newspapers somewhere by a commentator. I think it was the Daily Mail.

IIRC they reckoned he would bail in January or so.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

271 months

Sunday 11th October 2009
quotequote all


I've got you, David..

You've got me, Gordon...? Who's got you...?

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

220 months

Sunday 11th October 2009
quotequote all
BruceV8 said:
AndrewW-G said:
BruceV8 said:
AndrewW-G said:
I've still got money on a pandemic or "civil issue" that will prevent or delay the next election, something that may even surface to prevent further protests or even a refferendum on the EU treaty
I'm no fan of conspiracy theories, but this doesn't seem too far fetched at all. In the long run it would be political suicide for the Labour party though.
Unless the ultimate aim is to transform UK labour into the United European Socialist Labour party, where the UK is essentialy just one small region of a far larger ellectoral base i.e.they'd be happy to sacrifice for example the mp for Essex if it allowed them to win the rest of the country
Refusing to hold or honour an election and following this with a massive constitutional change (Submission to EU, republic, de facto one party state or whatever) would in effect be a coup d'etat (a self-coup) which, I believe, would be met with a counter coup - not necessarily a military one. When democracy is restored I doubt very much Labour in its present form would figure in it. Thats what I mean by political suicide!
I would love to see that

Labour banning all elections followed by an army marching into parliament and slaughtering the lot of them

And when i say an army it can either be the british army or even better an army of very very pissed off normal folk

king arthur

7,328 posts

277 months

Sunday 11th October 2009
quotequote all
If Brown continues until the election, the Tories will be able to put the case that he may not see through a whole term if he wins, so once again the British electorate will end up being led by someone they didn't vote for.

If he doesn't, then of course Labour are forced into a leadership election right before a general one.

It's a lose lose situation for them (hopefully).