944 S2 article
Author
Discussion

dogsharks

Original Poster:

427 posts

270 months

Monday 12th January 2004
quotequote all
Here’s some interesting information on the 944 S2.

Dogsharks










Thhom

1,742 posts

271 months

Monday 12th January 2004
quotequote all
Thanks a lot.

Mine is in the same color

AJLintern

4,350 posts

287 months

Monday 12th January 2004
quotequote all
Good article DS - I bought the right car then
Thom: Didn't you put 15mm spacers on your rear wheels?

dogsharks

Original Poster:

427 posts

270 months

Tuesday 13th January 2004
quotequote all
I'm very high on mine. Most people put too much weight on the 0-60 run, when in reality, few ever push their cars that hard on startup, nor do they need to.

Once underway, however, the breathing ability of that 4-valve head and those 3-liters really comes into play. Mine is so smooth it is deceptive. If it made more noise, had more vibration, sounded like a hair dryer about to explode, perhaps I'd think I was moving at a faster clip, ha ha. Actually, the over the road performance is very quick. There are few cars out there that would be able to put much distance between a S2 and their car, unless they were on an open stretch of interstate and they were willing to get up into speeds way over 100-mph to prove a point. Normally if we get caught on radar going that fast in the US, we go to jail. A S2 can get to 100 very quick, from say, 60, 70, 80-mph. I can't imagine anything getting there quick enough to really embarass a well driven S2.

I've had owners of new Porsches see my 928 (another car) in their rear view mirror, and they got spooked and thought they needed to prove a point on the road. One guy beat his car unmercifully, leaving large clouds of unburned fuel in the air, phew it was stinky, but he and his passenger were unable to leave my 20-year old 928S far enough behind that I couldn't read their license plate. When I saw the attempt to flee, hey it was a wide open stretch of interstate, and I was at the wheel of the fastest car sold in North America in 1983, so I gave chase. Yes the other car was fast, and it had an obvious edge in power, but in real world "street" driving, once you get up into the fast and very fast category, there's not really all that much room to really prove who has the better car on the public highways. In his mind, he should have been able to get away. In my mind I was pleased my old car kept a reasonable pace with the new one. Yes, I pushed mine to keep up, ha ha. It was a frustrating experience for the "new" Porsche, seeing my old battlewagon still there in the rear view mirror, albeit a little smaller than before. I think the S2 could have paced that car too. The S2 is not as solid on the road as a 928 because it isn't as heavy, and it doesn't have the highly engineered rear axle. This is good and bad. It makes the S2 an absolute superb car for the lower ranges of speed where it can show off it's lighter weight, say in anything up to the 120-mph range, etc. The 928 by comparison, is just as solid as a rock at any speed, as they should be for what they cost to build (the 1995 models were pushing $100,000 with options here in the US). They would run 170-mph out of the box with catalytic converters, as Al Holbert proved on the Bonneville salt flats with a stock 928.

My point in mentioning this, is to lavish all due praise on the S2. I think they are superb cars, under-rated by many, but deceptively fast in true over the road performance. Forget the 0-60 numbers, they are generally meaningless. I honestly think I could have paced that new Carrera with a S2, up to a point.

The S2 is a beautiful machine, anyone having one better hang on to it, and take good care of it, because you really do have something special. Many people think they are better cars than the 968, due to a preference on style, and the fact that the 968 is more technologically complex with it's vario cam, etc.

Dogsharks

Thhom

1,742 posts

271 months

Tuesday 13th January 2004
quotequote all
Andy : yes, now car looks better IMO.

DS : you have mail.

dogsharks

Original Poster:

427 posts

270 months

Tuesday 13th January 2004
quotequote all
Got it, response sent.

I'm enamored with the S2, in case you haven't noticed. I looked at a 968 a while back, and would have loved to get it, but it was selling for over twice what I paid for my S2, which was $9,900 US, with 84,000 miles. I consider that a good deal, but I'm sure the guy could have sold it for much more, as I snagged it on a Sunday eve before he had a chance to get all the telephone calls during the following week. You have to move fast when the time comes!

regards, Dogsharks

funbobby

1,695 posts

282 months

Tuesday 13th January 2004
quotequote all
interesting read,good to see articles raving about this model,not had mine long but love it!

AJLintern

4,350 posts

287 months

Tuesday 13th January 2004
quotequote all
Thhom said:
Andy : yes, now car looks better IMO.
So do you use longer wheel studs or do they have their own separate bolts and offset holes?

rodsmith

261 posts

285 months

Tuesday 13th January 2004
quotequote all
Thanks Dogsharks, its nice to be reminded what a truly great car it is!

Cheers

Rod

Thhom

1,742 posts

271 months

Tuesday 13th January 2004
quotequote all
AJLintern said:
So do you use longer wheel studs or do they have their own separate bolts and offset holes?




The spacers have their own separate bolts and offset holes indeed :



Plug and play equipment

(DS : I have not received it)

>> Edited by Thhom on Tuesday 13th January 16:50

dogsharks

Original Poster:

427 posts

270 months

Tuesday 13th January 2004
quotequote all
I resent the info, lemme know if you don't receive it, I'll send it through other means or post it here, at your option.

DS

>> Edited by dogsharks on Tuesday 13th January 20:50

AJLintern

4,350 posts

287 months

Tuesday 13th January 2004
quotequote all
So do you notice and improvement/deterioration in the handling with the wider rear track, or is it mainly cosmetic? Where can I get spacers and how much are they likely to cost? Sorry for all the questions

Thhom

1,742 posts

271 months

Wednesday 14th January 2004
quotequote all
I haven't noticed any difference in the handling, apart maybe from the car being less likely to oversteer when coming out of tight turns. The idea was anyway to improve the looks, as IMO the rear arches do not look as filled as they should.

DS : I eventually received it, thank you.

Melv

4,708 posts

289 months

Wednesday 14th January 2004
quotequote all
Discs look a bit scored Thom.............

Melv

Thhom

1,742 posts

271 months

Wednesday 14th January 2004
quotequote all
That's not my car, Melv.

edited to add that no one is ever going to care about those discs anymore since that S2 ended in a tree last year

>> Edited by Thhom on Wednesday 14th January 18:45

diver944

1,853 posts

300 months

Thursday 15th January 2004
quotequote all
Did it have the rear spacers on when it drove into a tree

Thhom

1,742 posts

271 months

Friday 16th January 2004
quotequote all
Yes, it had 15 mm spacers at the rear, 21 mm spacers at the front (thoses pictured above), a rare 21 mm Cup rear sway bar and M030 Konis all round.
The picture was taken before the new owner took possession and broke it.