Which Alfa?
Author
Discussion

rob999

Original Poster:

610 posts

203 months

Monday 12th October 2009
quotequote all
Hello,
I've been tasked (once again) to find a car for my folks....my Dad's always had Alfas...from a 1.5 Cloverleaf Sud through 33's, 75's, 146's, 147's, 156 etc etc.
Anyway he will drive it most the time but as is always the case Mum has a say in it too.
She likes the look of the 3.2 Spider, Dad likes the Brera S 2.2.
Very different animals I know, space isn't an issue hence the spider being in the Mix.

Which would you choose and why?

Thanks!

jamieboy

5,921 posts

251 months

Monday 12th October 2009
quotequote all
I've never been a fan of the 2.2 engine - in fact, the 2.2 is why I've got a diesel 159 at the moment. smile It's recently been replaced in the 159 with a 1750 turbo, and I think this is meant to be in the Brera and Spider later this year too.

So if it comes down to those two, I'd go for the Spider. If the choice was 3.2 Spider or 3.2 Brera S, it'd be a harder decision and it would come down more to what you/they want out of the car.

RicksAlfas

14,269 posts

266 months

Monday 12th October 2009
quotequote all
I'm with Jamie on this one. I'd avoid the 2.2 - it's a run out engine and no longer being made, they are just using stocks up. If mpg is not an issue a 3.2 Spider has got to be a lovely wafter. If it is an issue, I'd wait for a 1750.

rob999

Original Poster:

610 posts

203 months

Monday 12th October 2009
quotequote all
tahnks guys, i have to say the 2.2 isn't the most gutsy of engines. I think the old man thinks the prodrive revisions has somehow transformed the car!!

Sadly due to cost, they won't be able to stretch to the 3.2 S...as it'll be a used purchase...

OperationAlfa

2,014 posts

219 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
I would avoid the JTS generally.

pixelpimp

674 posts

219 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
Even the Prodrive 2.2 is a disappointment.
The only thing they did was make it lower and go round corners.
I'd take a trip down to James Wheeler at Black and White garage (Ind Alfa specialist Newbury)
He's usually got a good selection of nearly used Alfas on the forecourt.
Also why Brera, Why not the GT? It's still better than the modern Alfas and the V6 is an Alfa engine not an poor American excuse for one.

rob999

Original Poster:

610 posts

203 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
well i've suggested a 3.2 brera now as well..lol
hey i am well aware of the failings of the 2.2 brera s. Having read up on it they haven't really improved that much on the standard car.
Tbh I've never really liked the rear end of the brera but hey its not for me! whatever they get I'll be insured on it and drive it every now and again so...!

segg250

12,254 posts

238 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
Spider 3.2 or diesel no doubt about the spider bit.

funwithrevs

594 posts

217 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
pixelpimp said:
and the V6 is an Alfa engine not an poor American excuse for one.
I believe the 'GM' engine is a Holden block (Australian) with Alfa heads stuck on it.

rob999

Original Poster:

610 posts

203 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
last question then -

3.2 spider or 3.2 brera s? smile

PhilipAlfa

359 posts

196 months

Friday 16th October 2009
quotequote all
I would go for the Brera 3.2 S as you get that lovely leather dash...

rob999

Original Poster:

610 posts

203 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
well they've traded in their gt blackline for the v6 spider.
low down burbling exhaust note here we come...lol smile

RicksAlfas

14,269 posts

266 months

Monday 19th October 2009
quotequote all
rob999 said:
last question then -

3.2 spider or 3.2 brera s? smile
3.2 Spider.
HTH.

biggrin