New airport scanners
Author
Discussion

BiggusLaddus

Original Poster:

821 posts

259 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8303983.stm

How much longer before people just stop using airports for non-essential travel? Being treated like a terrorist really doesn't set you up well for your holiday.

Odie

4,187 posts

210 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
Metal detectors and other scanning equipment just offer a false sense of security to the general public and give them that feeling of "safety" when infact your never safe, its just that these incidents are so few and far between that most of our safety is shear blind luck.

tegwin

1,682 posts

234 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
Cant see a problem with that...


seems a waste of effort... if I was a terrorist I wouldnt be carrying my weapons in through that door anyway!

fido

18,774 posts

283 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
£80k .. darn .. that's far too pricey frown

shakotan

10,862 posts

224 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
fido said:
£80k .. darn .. that's far too pricey frown
Unfortunately, that's what the technology costs.

We only make the power supply for such x-ray systems, and they are £5k each selling to the manufacturer!

cottonfoo

6,049 posts

238 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
Since male security guards can't pat down female passengers, will only female security staff be able to view female passengers? Will heavily-covered religious types be exempt for modesty reasons? Are parents happy that their kids will also be walking through?

Dr.Doofenshmirtz

16,952 posts

228 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
...And before any of you lot get any ideas - I've already sent my CV to every airport for the job of security operative!
I really can't think of a better job?

AB

20,319 posts

223 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
Uh oh, now everyone is going to know I have a little penis.

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

256 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
Think of the uses of this guys, we are finally on the way to x-ray specs and the joy of perving that they will bring!! smile

Would be funny if someone went through security dressed as a woman and they had a big ol swinger in their panties eek !!

Shoot Blair

3,097 posts

204 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
As I've said before. It is totally possible to make a high explosive into a fabric. This crap will do nothing. It's only a matter of time before the chaps start using old chemistry books to make explosives, wiki the chemical name and go "wow" at the properties.

You want pH neutral, non-volatile, non-reactive, odour free, insoluble, etc, etc high explosive? It is totally doable and anyone pedalling this "security" is merely acting in a selfish and highly (ignorant) profitable way.

I've given this a lot of thought and I'm virtually certain I could get a couple of Kg of this stuff onto an aeroplane with no problem. I could also make it in my shed. It would not be that much of a step to get it made into a viable fabric.

All my opinion.

Blue Cat

976 posts

214 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
cottonfoo said:
Since male security guards can't pat down female passengers, will only female security staff be able to view female passengers? Will heavily-covered religious types be exempt for modesty reasons? Are parents happy that their kids will also be walking through?
Well considering searches I have had by some female security guards at airports, I would much prefer this option. If some security guard gets all hot and bother over what appears to be a very fuzzy image - then good luck to them, I won't know about it and don't really care

grumbledoak

32,519 posts

261 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
A serious removal of your final privacy. The terrorists have won.

And I bet all the positive 'Feedback' on there is from pervy male security guards, salivating at the prospect.

TonyHetherington

32,091 posts

278 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
I was scanned by one of these at Heathrow when they were testing - where's the problem?!

davido140

9,614 posts

254 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
TonyHetherington said:
I was scanned by one of these at Heathrow when they were testing - where's the problem?!
here's the problem, they kept the picture and put it on the internet...


grumbledoak

32,519 posts

261 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
TonyHetherington said:
I was scanned by one of these at Heathrow when they were testing - where's the problem?!
Well, you know how we get the occassional thread about people 'knocking one off in the bogs'? These posts are normally from otherwise intelligent office workers without access to pictures of naked people.

Now imagine the actions of knuckleheads with access to pictures of every woman on a flight, naked. Sweaty and lopsided, they'd be in the bogs every half an hour! Mercifully you don't normally have to shake their hand.

F i F

48,472 posts

279 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
Abdullah Hassan al-Asiri detonated an explosive device concealed in his rectum in an attack in Jeddah. The trigger device was activated by a mobile phone.

Internal bombs are not that effective as the body itself is a very good shock insulator, but it would have the desired effect in an aeroplane in flight. Such devices will not be detected by this scanner.

J500ANT

3,103 posts

267 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
I'd love to see the operators face when the xray shows up my bodypiercing!

Ganglandboss

8,526 posts

231 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
Shoot Blair said:
As I've said before. It is totally possible to make a high explosive into a fabric. This crap will do nothing. It's only a matter of time before the chaps start using old chemistry books to make explosives, wiki the chemical name and go "wow" at the properties.

You want pH neutral, non-volatile, non-reactive, odour free, insoluble, etc, etc high explosive? It is totally doable and anyone pedalling this "security" is merely acting in a selfish and highly (ignorant) profitable way.

I've given this a lot of thought and I'm virtually certain I could get a couple of Kg of this stuff onto an aeroplane with no problem. I could also make it in my shed. It would not be that much of a step to get it made into a viable fabric.

All my opinion.
hehe

Your user name is 'Shoot Blair' and you've posted on a public forum about your knowledge of explosives? I'd be expecting a knock on the door from the anti-terrorist squad if I were you!




I hope not though - I really hope you really are going to shoot the c**t! wink

Zod

35,295 posts

286 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
Predictably enough, one of the comment posters on the bbc story has dropped the P bomb. Paedophiles will get jobs as security officers at airports in order to be able to get off on black and white x-ray pictures of naked children. rolleyes

glazbagun

15,319 posts

225 months

Tuesday 13th October 2009
quotequote all
Ganglandboss said:
Shoot Blair said:
As I've said before. It is totally possible to make a high explosive into a fabric. This crap will do nothing. It's only a matter of time before the chaps start using old chemistry books to make explosives, wiki the chemical name and go "wow" at the properties.

You want pH neutral, non-volatile, non-reactive, odour free, insoluble, etc, etc high explosive? It is totally doable and anyone pedalling this "security" is merely acting in a selfish and highly (ignorant) profitable way.

I've given this a lot of thought and I'm virtually certain I could get a couple of Kg of this stuff onto an aeroplane with no problem. I could also make it in my shed. It would not be that much of a step to get it made into a viable fabric.

All my opinion.
hehe

Your user name is 'Shoot Blair' and you've posted on a public forum about your knowledge of explosives? I'd be expecting a knock on the door from the anti-terrorist squad if I were you!



I hope not though - I really hope you really are going to shoot the c**t! wink
rofl