Auto vs manual off road

Auto vs manual off road

Poll: Auto vs manual off road

Total Members Polled: 69

Auto: 55%
Manual: 45%
Author
Discussion

Bill

Original Poster:

52,860 posts

256 months

Tuesday 20th October 2009
quotequote all
I've only ever used manuals off road but now I'm considering a Disco3 an auto is tempting. Anyone got any views either way?

PhillipM

6,524 posts

190 months

Tuesday 20th October 2009
quotequote all
Always prefered a manual myself, far more control.

Angry Sheep

1,120 posts

211 months

Tuesday 20th October 2009
quotequote all
PhillipM said:
Always prefered a manual myself, far more control.
+1

However, the auto box on the D3 is meant to be excellent.

Gafferjim

1,335 posts

266 months

Tuesday 20th October 2009
quotequote all
I have a manual Defender, which I use for off road and green lanes etc, It's a great tool, but recently I've hade problems with my left knee, and the clutch on the defender will put me out of action if I drive it, so I've bought an auto 300TDi Disco, with all the toys on for off roading.
Whilst on downhill slopes, you have more control in the defender, due to first/low in the defender is a much lower speed than first/low with the auto, but for everything else, the auto is great, you're never in the wrong gear, and it pulls up the slopes just as good as the manual. It's so much easier to drive, that my daughter will drive it on the bumpy muddy bits, were she won't drive the Defender.

normalbloke

7,464 posts

220 months

Tuesday 20th October 2009
quotequote all
I have a 5.9 CJ7 with a TH400 box.
I personally love it.If I want to arse about with gears,I'll get my fix with the Unimog,which has 16 forward and 16 back.
Only downside with an auto IMHO is their dislike of water, but when plumbed properly and vaccum tested,they are good to go.Autos tend to be less brutal on drivetrain components too(useful for any vehicle with plasticene driveshafts......)

Lefty Guns

16,173 posts

203 months

Wednesday 21st October 2009
quotequote all
More and more people seem to be using autos for RTV's presumably to utilise the benfits of the torque convertor.

I always prefered manuals but I suppose if the auto box can be locked into specific gears then it's a good idea.

Normalbloke, my mog only had 8 gears (6 forward, 2 reverse) irked

What do you use yours for?

bigblock

773 posts

199 months

Wednesday 21st October 2009
quotequote all
Bill said:
I've only ever used manuals off road but now I'm considering a Disco3 an auto is tempting. Anyone got any views either way?
Once you have used an autobox for offroading it is unlikely you would want to go back to a manual. The auto makes for smoother progress and eliminates stalling the engine at a particularly inconvenient moment(like at the top of a steep ascent).
There is more skill involved when using a manual and if you only off road occasionaly then perhaps the manual is more fun. However if you are offroad regularly an auto takes a lot of the hassle out of the rough stuff and I also prefer them for a big 4x4 on the road.

100SRV

2,135 posts

243 months

Wednesday 21st October 2009
quotequote all
Automatic for me - the transmission knows what is best under most circumstances with the benefit of reduced driver workload and stress on the drivetrain. There is always drive to the wheels whether in gear or shifting between them which is excellent should you find yourself in the wrong gear in water, soft sand or hill climbing. If petrol were cheaper I would put a ZF 4-speed in my Bowler but I'll stick with the LT77 as it works.

normalbloke

7,464 posts

220 months

Wednesday 21st October 2009
quotequote all
Lefty Guns said:
More and more people seem to be using autos for RTV's presumably to utilise the benfits of the torque convertor.

I always prefered manuals but I suppose if the auto box can be locked into specific gears then it's a good idea.

Normalbloke, my mog only had 8 gears (6 forward, 2 reverse) irked

What do you use yours for?
It's a toy!

Bill

Original Poster:

52,860 posts

256 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
thumbupCheer for the input guys. I'm still tempted by a manual as they're cheaper and I enjoy changing gear (odd I know) although the auto suits the D3 luxobarge feelscratchchin

Liszt

4,329 posts

271 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
Had an auto on my old Rangie and it was point and go off roading. Now have a manual defender and you need to think a bit about the gears.

On a D3 consider that it will be easier to sell on with an auto than a manual

Bill

Original Poster:

52,860 posts

256 months

Thursday 22nd October 2009
quotequote all
Liszt said:
On a D3 consider that it will be easier to sell on with an auto than a manual
Good point, but manuals are cheaper now and I plan to keep it 10 years.

Stubby Pete

2,488 posts

247 months

Sunday 25th October 2009
quotequote all
Bill said:
Do you fancy a Ben and Kev Special?
rofl

FamilyGuy

850 posts

191 months

Sunday 25th October 2009
quotequote all
Bother. A bad bit of clicking meant I voted manual instead of auto. Auto for me. I've seen it suggested that auto's are better at extreme uphilling (something I've not done) and they are definitely better for low speed manoeuvring, esp with trailers (something I have). I recently saw some official Landcruiser figures that claimed the auto had better MPG than the manual - which was more than a little unexpected.

Bill

Original Poster:

52,860 posts

256 months

Sunday 25th October 2009
quotequote all
Stubby Pete said:
Bill said:
Do you fancy a Ben and Kev Special?
rofl
Well, yeshehe

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Monday 26th October 2009
quotequote all
Bill said:
I've only ever used manuals off road but now I'm considering a Disco3 an auto is tempting. Anyone got any views either way?
This depends on some other factors. Part
of it is preference and I often wonder if the haters of autos have ever actually used one.

In short both are capable and both have pros and cons. Most of these pros and cons are very related to the terrain and type of off roading you are doing.

Rock crawling is huge in the US because of much of the terrain allows for little else. Autos are pretty much required for this as manuals make it very difficult and are far more likely to result in a worn clutch and broken diffs/axles.

In general autos are more sympathetic to the mechanicals than a manual.

Sand and slippery mud are also good places for an auto as they can do something no manual can. Change gear
with power on. No matter how good you changing gear in manual will lose momentum, which is often critical.

Downsides of autos are they are arguably less fun. Give slightly less low
speed control, although unless you are competing in trial events this is not really all that important.

Downhill control, this is partly due to most autos having taller gearing, but most of it is due to the torque converter. This means going down a steep slippery hill in an auto can be a lot more scary than in a manual due to the comparitive lack of engine braking. That said Hill Descent Controls make this less of an issue these days and you can always drive the vehicle different, a common technique is to use reverse when going down a steep hill as it will increase "engine braking" using the torque cnverter. It sounds backards but is a proven method.

On really rough, rutted hard ground autos can be a pain. With a manual you can leave them at tickover or light throtle. An auto will often semi stall (come to a halt) on tickover in such cases (again due to how a torque converter works). This
means you often have to go over this rough ground faster in order to not keep stopping.

Other things to consider are on the road. Auto more relaxed and easier. But slower, worse fuel economy and again arguably less fun.

If you only plan on light off roading the either will be fine. If it's more serious then a little more research on whether an auto will be pro or a con at it. Apart frorm that it just has to be personal preference IMO.

offroading.net

2,632 posts

191 months

Monday 26th October 2009
quotequote all
Auto wins, have a manual torque converter lockup on my jeep, good for the downhill stuff

Alicatt1

805 posts

196 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
Had a manual 4.2TD 80 series Landcruiser, great vehicle and with the right tyres on fantastic off road, that was 12 years ago, now I have a Range Rover Sport TDV8 and it is an auto with terrain response. It makes offroading so much easier and it can go lots of places which the LC couldn't go.
Up until I drove the RRS I would have said manual and solid axels every time, but, technology moves on now the newer vehicles are just as or more than competent as the old er ones.

Get youself a Landrover Experience free halfday trial and take out a D3 or RRS and find out how good an autobox 4x4 can be.

Bill

Original Poster:

52,860 posts

256 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
Alicatt1 said:
Up until I drove the RRS I would have said manual and solid axels every time, but, technology moves on now the newer vehicles are just as or more than competent as the old er ones.
But also heavier and more complicated, which is an issue if you're planning to take your family to Morocco. I'm pretty confident I can bodge a manual or solid axles if needs be, but I wouldn't know where to start with a D3.

Lefty Guns

16,173 posts

203 months

Wednesday 28th October 2009
quotequote all
Alicatt1 said:
Had a manual 4.2TD 80 series Landcruiser, great vehicle and with the right tyres on fantastic off road, that was 12 years ago, now I have a Range Rover Sport TDV8 and it is an auto with terrain response. It makes offroading so much easier and it can go lots of places which the LC couldn't go.
.
I have no experience of the new RR but I'm frankly astonished at this statement!