Who'd of thunk it?

[Smiler.]

I had the need to google a word for its definition (as you do).

I got the answer on the second hit, but being a bloke, I simply had to check out hit 5.

I didn't read it all, but WTF?


http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&client=fi...fficial&hs=yj8&ei=yTr5SvOMIaOd4gb83cG4BA&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&ved=0CA8QBSgA&q=what+does+palava+mean&spell=1


No pictures, but might be considered NSFW.

Carry on

[Spokey]

Who'd HAVE thunk it.

FFS.

[bigTee]

linky no worky

[WorAl]

Smiler. said:

I had the need to google a word for its definition (as you do).

I got the answer on the second hit, but being a bloke, I simply had to check out hit 5.

I didn't read it all, but WTF?


this


No pictures, but might be considered NSFW.

Carry on

I'll sort that for you

[Spokey]

AND "palaver".

Grrrr....

[AB]

Hmm, can you search the web for grammar tips?

http://languagerules.wordpress.com/2006/12/06/coul...

Ah...

[bikemonster]

Spokey said:

Who'd HAVE thunk it.

FFS.

Although "Who'da thunk it", being the phonetic is, I believe, more acceptable. After all, if we are going to accept "thunk", we can't be too picky about the contraction of "who would have".

Still, I agree, "Who'd of..." is just plain wrong.

As you were.