Winky finally admits immigration has cost some parts of UK
Discussion
Well it looks like either hell has frozen or winky's finaly realised that the jig is up
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politic...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politic...
6655321 said:
Isn't that like, a bit ... Racist? How come when Winky says it, it is all perfectly fine, and OK, and hey when the Hitler-Winky, (Griffin), says it, he is denounced as a racist?
It's also a little bit illegal under the EU laws agreed to by The Supreme Leader Comrade winky, as long as somebody comes from an EU country we cannot discriminate against them, either legislatively or as an employer on a case by case basis.That winky doesn’t even seem to have an understand of the basic points of the EU agreement he's signed us up to is truly terrifying.
To avoid further confusion when discussing winkies
Heir winky = nick griffin (holocaust denying loon)
Comrade winky = winky Mcf

Edited by AndrewW-G on Thursday 12th November 16:05
Bing o said:
6655321 said:
Isn't that like, a bit ... Racist? How come when Winky says it, it is all perfectly fine, and OK, and hey when the Hitler-Winky, (Griffin), says it, he is denounced as a racist?
Is Winky (the kilted s
6655321 said:
Bing o said:
6655321 said:
Isn't that like, a bit ... Racist? How come when Winky says it, it is all perfectly fine, and OK, and hey when the Hitler-Winky, (Griffin), says it, he is denounced as a racist?
Is Winky (the kilted s
Stupid question

Griffin isnt a racist because of his views on immigration, if people fail to see that they are either being obtuse or are just plain thick.
6655321 said:
Bing o said:
6655321 said:
Isn't that like, a bit ... Racist? How come when Winky says it, it is all perfectly fine, and OK, and hey when the Hitler-Winky, (Griffin), says it, he is denounced as a racist?
Is Winky (the kilted s
Marf said:
6655321 said:
Bing o said:
6655321 said:
Isn't that like, a bit ... Racist? How come when Winky says it, it is all perfectly fine, and OK, and hey when the Hitler-Winky, (Griffin), says it, he is denounced as a racist?
Is Winky (the kilted s
Stupid question

Griffin isnt a racist because of his views on immigration, if people fail to see that they are either being obtuse or are just plain thick.
Edited by 6655321 on Thursday 12th November 16:09
Marf said:
6655321 said:
Marf said:
6655321 said:
Bing o said:
6655321 said:
Isn't that like, a bit ... Racist? How come when Winky says it, it is all perfectly fine, and OK, and hey when the Hitler-Winky, (Griffin), says it, he is denounced as a racist?
Is Winky (the kilted s
Stupid question

Griffin isnt a racist because of his views on immigration, if people fail to see that they are either being obtuse or are just plain thick.
HTH

You are saying that the ONLY reason Griffin is deemed racist is because of his Holocaust denier s

6655321 said:
You are saying that the ONLY reason Griffin is deemed racist is because of his Holocaust denier s
t? His immigration policies are therefore not racist?
No, its no just his holocaust denial, Its pretty clear given his history and the company he keeps what his views are on non whites. Again, are you being obtuse? 
Its not racist to discuss immigration, any fool can see that.
Marf said:
No, its no just his holocaust denial, Its pretty clear given his history and the company he keeps what his views are on non whites. Again, are you being obtuse?
Its not racist to discuss immigration, any fool can see that.
The point is that when Winky comes out and says "immigration has made parts of the UK worse", nobody bats an eyelid, but when hilter-winky does, it is the work of the devil? The same argument, except one is acceptable, and one isn't. I know his view on non-whites, but I'm talking about POLICY. The same idea, different people, different reaction. Its not racist to discuss immigration, any fool can see that.
6655321 said:
Marf said:
No, its no just his holocaust denial, Its pretty clear given his history and the company he keeps what his views are on non whites. Again, are you being obtuse?
Its not racist to discuss immigration, any fool can see that.
The point is that when Winky comes out and says "immigration has made parts of the UK worse", nobody bats an eyelid, but when hilter-winky does, it is the work of the devil? The same argument, except one is acceptable, and one isn't. I know his view on non-whites, but I'm talking about POLICY. The same idea, different people, different reaction. Its not racist to discuss immigration, any fool can see that.
As you were.

I understand why he is vilified, that is not what I am talking about. I am talking about the same idea, but perception of the speaker means a different reaction. It would appear that as vilified as Griffin is, he may have been right regarding immigration, and the issues therein, but, because it is griffin saying it, nobody actually bothers to listen to the policy. Winky says it, and now it is perfectly OK to say it? It seems utterly weak, and ignorant to ignore WHAT is being said, because of the person saying it.
6655321 said:
I understand why he is vilified, that is not what I am talking about. I am talking about the same idea, but perception of the speaker means a different reaction. It would appear that as vilified as Griffin is, he may have been right regarding immigration, and the issues therein, but, because it is griffin saying it, nobody actually bothers to listen to the policy. Winky says it, and now it is perfectly OK to say it? It seems utterly weak, and ignorant to ignore WHAT is being said, because of the person saying it.
If Griffin is saying "immigration is bad for the UK economically and for reasons of social cohesion", what I hear is "I want a white UK".If Winky says "immigration is bad for the UK economically and for reasons of social cohesion", as much as I dislike the t

The two men may be saying the same thing, but they are coming at it from two completely different angles.
Edited by Marf on Thursday 12th November 16:30
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff