Sigma 12-24 or Canon 17-40?
Discussion
The 12-24 is really an ultra wide on full frame, I managed to get one cheapa couple of months ago, so use it on a crop camera with a view to longer term upgrade to FF. The sigma works best stopped down F7 +, on a FF it will be soft in the corners but it is an ultra wide and the distortions are well managed. Colours are very good too. Only gripe is that fitting a filter or ND filter holder is impossible on FF at 12mm. You can just about get away with it on a crop.
I've not used the 17-40 but I'd expect the IQ to be better, just you lose the Ultra wide capability.
I've not used the 17-40 but I'd expect the IQ to be better, just you lose the Ultra wide capability.
I've got the 12-24 sigma and use it on a FF body. To be honest it's a pretty specialised piece of kit and although capable of some great shots, I don't find myself using it that much. Think being able to stand next to the Gherkin or Tower 42 in London and still get the whole building in the frame...
For general landscape I'd probably go with the 17-40L.
For general landscape I'd probably go with the 17-40L.
Hedgeman said:
I've got the 12-24 sigma and use it on a FF body. To be honest it's a pretty specialised piece of kit and although capable of some great shots, I don't find myself using it that much. Think being able to stand next to the Gherkin or Tower 42 in London and still get the whole building in the frame...
For general landscape I'd probably go with the 17-40L.
I'd second this.For general landscape I'd probably go with the 17-40L.
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


